IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v56y2024i1s0890838923000914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybridity, institutional logics and value creation mechanisms in the corporatisation of social care

Author

Listed:
  • Ferry, Laurence
  • Wegorowski, Piotr
  • Andrews, Rhys

Abstract

Hybridisation of public services has increased under neoliberalism and New Public Management policies, over the past four decades since the 1980s. Hybrid arrangements for service provision blend public, private and nonprofit approaches to organising in ways imbued with a range of institutional logics impinging on their value creation mechanisms. Within this context, the corporatisation of public services represents a striking manifestation of hybridisation. However, comparatively little research has considered how hybrid organising through corporatisation shapes the mechanisms through which value is created in corporatized public services. To address this gap, through a field level study, this paper examines hybridity, institutional logics and value creation mechanisms in the corporatisation of adult social care in English local government. The study found that the use of different hybrid corporate forms – blended, segregated, segmented and blocked - to provide services to elderly and vulnerable citizens had important implications for the mechanisms through which financial and social values were created. Nevertheless, it was also apparent that different forms of hybrid organising could co-exist within the same organization along with multiple value creation mechanisms, underlining the unique dynamics of hybridisation pertaining to the corporatisation of public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferry, Laurence & Wegorowski, Piotr & Andrews, Rhys, 2024. "Hybridity, institutional logics and value creation mechanisms in the corporatisation of social care," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:56:y:2024:i:1:s0890838923000914
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2023.101244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgio Giacomelli, 2020. "The role of hybrid professionals in the public sector: a review and research synthesis," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1624-1651, November.
    2. Jarmo Vakkuri & Jan-Erik Johanson & Nancy Chun Feng & Filippo Giordano, 2021. "Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations – past, present and future," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 245-260, March.
    3. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2011. "Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 407-423, December.
    4. Cerbone, Dannielle & Maroun, Warren, 2020. "Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    5. Campanale, Cristina & Cinquini, Lino & Grossi, Giuseppe, 2021. "The role of multiple values in developing management accounting practices in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    6. Belinda Luke & Martie‐Louise Verreynne, 2006. "Exploring strategic entrepreneurship in the public sector," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 4-26, January.
    7. Tobias Krause & Sandra Van Thiel, 2019. "Perceived managerial autonomy in municipally owned corporations: disentangling the impact of output control, process control, and policy-profession conflict," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 187-211, February.
    8. Chris Skelcher, 2017. "An enterprising municipality? Municipalisation, corporatisation and the political economy of Birmingham City Council in the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 927-945, November.
    9. Stephen P. Osborne, 2018. "From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 225-231, February.
    10. Rana, Tarek & Hoque, Zahirul, 2020. "Institutionalising multiple accountability logics in public services: Insights from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    11. Golyagina, Alena & Valuckas, Danielius, 2020. "Boundary-work in management accounting: The case of hybrid professionalism," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    12. Bart Voorn & Marieke L. van Genugten & Sandra van Thiel, 2017. "The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: a systematic review," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 820-841, September.
    13. Laurence Ferry & Thomas Ahrens & Rihab Khalifa, 2019. "Public value, institutional logics and practice variation during austerity localism at Newcastle City Council," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 96-115, January.
    14. Laurence Ferry & Rhys Andrews & Chris Skelcher & Piotr Wegorowski, 2018. "New development: Corporatization of local authorities in England in the wake of austerity 2010–2016," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 477-480, September.
    15. Rhys Andrews, 2022. "Organizational Publicness and Mortality: Explaining the Dissolution of Local Authority Companies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 350-371, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bart Voorn & Marieke van Genugten & Sandra Van Thiel, 2020. "Performance of municipally owned corporations: Determinants and mechanisms," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 191-212, June.
    2. Rhys Andrews, 2022. "Organizational Publicness and Mortality: Explaining the Dissolution of Local Authority Companies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 350-371, March.
    3. Ligorio, Lorenzo & Caputo, Fabio & Venturelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainability disclosure and reporting by municipally owned water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Sheaff, Rod & Allen, Pauline & Exworthy, Mark & Mannion, Russell, 2024. "The policy and politics of healthcare corporatisation: The case of the English NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    5. Krause, Tobias Alexander & Ivanov, Igor & Sidki, Marcus, 2023. "Blame or gain? Is institutional trust impacted by the perception of political influence in state-owned enterprises?," Working Paper Series 30, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business and Law.
    6. Marc Pilon & Alisher Mansurov, 2024. "Hybrid organizations: a classification within economic sectors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Tomasz Jedynak & Krzysztof Wąsowicz, 2021. "The Relationship between Efficiency and Quality of Municipally Owned Corporations: Evidence from Local Public Transport and Waste Management in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.
    9. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    10. Giliberto Capano & Benedetto Lepori, 2024. "Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 53-82, March.
    11. Laura Carmouze & Alan Sandry, 2020. "Complex Thinking and Computing Organization Facing Contingent Problems," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 401-419, June.
    12. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    13. Diego Cagigas & Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Echevarría-Cuenca & Celia Gilsanz-Gómez, 2022. "Explaining public officials’ opinions on blockchain adoption: a vignette experiment [Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 343-357.
    14. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    15. Tuomas Korhonen & Virpi Sillanpää & Aki Jääskeläinen, 2023. "Anchor practices that guide horizontal performance measurement: an interventionist case study of the financial aspect of new technology implementation in healthcare," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 787-816, September.
    16. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    17. Tom Christensen & Anne Fimreite & Per Lægreid, 2014. "Joined-Up Government for Welfare Administration Reform in Norway," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 439-456, December.
    18. Mai Thanh Lan & Ta Huy Hung, 2018. "The Leadership Competency In Vietnam Public Administration," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).
    19. Antonia Sorge & Letizia De Luca & Giancarlo Tamanza & Emanuela Saita, 2021. "Ward Staff as a Tool to Promote Wellbeing among Prison Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Daniel Torchia & Jacopo Fresta & Laura Corazza & Chiara Certomà, 2023. "New European Bauhaus for a Circular Economy and Waste Management: The Lived Experience of a Community Container Garden at the University of Turin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:56:y:2024:i:1:s0890838923000914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.