IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v18y2010i3p165-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is marketing academia losing its way? It depends where you look

Author

Listed:
  • Uncles, Mark D.

Abstract

Heterogeneity lies at the heart of the issue of whether marketing academia is losing its way. On the one hand, critics point to research studies that address trivial themes and non-problems. Giving grounds for optimism, on the other hand, are the hundreds of research studies that investigate significant managerial problems in ways that are rigorous, relevant and accessible. Looking ahead, we should re-think the significance of marketing, encourage industry collaboration, streamline journal publication processes, give extra weight to management-relevant criteria when refereeing journal articles, and reflect these practices in the way future generations of marketers are trained.

Suggested Citation

  • Uncles, Mark D., 2010. "Is marketing academia losing its way? It depends where you look," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 165-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:18:y:2010:i:3:p:165-167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.06.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358210000406
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.06.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randolph E. Bucklin & Sunil Gupta, 1999. "Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 247-273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emek Basker, 2012. "Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector," NBER Chapters,in: Standards, Patents and Innovations National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Kurt A. Jetta & Erick W. Rengifo, 2009. "Improved Baseline Sales," Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series dp2009-02, Fordham University, Department of Economics.
    3. K. Sudhir, 2001. "Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 244-264, October.
    4. Stockton, Matthew C. & Capps, Oral Jr., 2005. "Nerlovian Hedonic Models For Three Different Container Sizes Of Fluid Milk," A.E. Research Series 305038, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Guyt, Jonne & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2018. "On consumer choice patterns and the net impact of feature promotions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 490-508.
    6. Fok, D. & Horváth, C. & Paap, R. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2004. "A hierarchical Bayes error correction model to explain dynamic effects," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2004-27, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    7. van Heerde, Harald J. & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2024. "Household and retail panel data in retailing research: Time for a renaissance?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 104-113.
    8. Robert P. Rooderkerk & Harald J. van Heerde & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2013. "Optimizing Retail Assortments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 699-715, September.
    9. Radek Froulík & Radek Zdeněk & Jana Lososová, 2023. "The Economy of Retail Chains in the FMCG Sector: The Case of Czechia," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 20-33, June.
    10. Stefan Sleep & John Hulland & Richard A. Gooner, 2019. "THE DATA HIERARCHY: factors influencing the adoption and implementation of data-driven decision making," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 230-248, December.
    11. Epstein, Leonardo D. & Inostroza-Quezada, Ignacio E. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Choi, S. Chan, 2021. "Dynamic effects of store promotions on purchase conversion: Expanding technology applications with innovative analytics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 279-289.
    12. Steven M. Shugan, 2002. "In Search of Data: An Editorial," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 369-377.
    13. R Fildes & K Nikolopoulos & S F Crone & A A Syntetos, 2008. "Forecasting and operational research: a review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1150-1172, September.
    14. Nobuhiko Terui & Masataka Ban, 2008. "Modeling heterogeneous effective advertising stock using single-source data," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 415-438, December.
    15. Suresh Divakar & Brian T. Ratchford & Venkatesh Shankar, 2005. "Practice Prize Article—: A Multichannel, Multiregion Sales Forecasting Model and Decision Support System for Consumer Packaged Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 334-350, July.
    16. Koen Pauwels & Shuba Srinivasan & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "When Do Price Thresholds Matter in Retail Categories?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 83-100, 01-02.
    17. Stockton, Matthew C. & Capps, Oral, Jr., 2005. "Demand System Analysis With Emphasis On Container Sizes Of Non-Alcoholic Beverages," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19137, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Szabo, Marietta & Kennedy, Rachel, 2017. "Retailers' and manufacturers' price-promotion decisions: Intuitive or evidence-based?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 189-200.
    19. Guyt, Jonne, 2015. "Consumer choice models on the effect of promotions in retailing," Other publications TiSEM c310f652-d725-4764-aac7-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:18:y:2010:i:3:p:165-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.