IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v97y2012icp462-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Solid State Anaerobic Digestion by inoculum recirculation: The case of an existing Mechanical Biological Treatment plant

Author

Listed:
  • Di Maria, Francesco
  • Sordi, Alessio
  • Micale, Caterina

Abstract

The energetic exploitation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste treated in an existing Mechanical Biological Treatment plant was found to be successful by the Solid State Anaerobic Digestion. The amount of inoculum used per tonne of waste for starting the anaerobic process was shown to have a relevant effect on both biogas and biomethane production. For a waste-to-inoculum ratio ranging from 1:1 to 1:3 (w/w), the energy production increased from about 100kWh/tonne to about 380kWh/tonne of waste organic fraction. Consequently, the investment costs also rise, going from about 180€ to more than 370€/tonne of treated municipal solid waste organic fraction. The economic optimization analysis showed that the waste-to-inoculum ratio that minimized the treatment cost, ranged from 1:1.5 to 1:2.5, being strongly influenced by the plant size (i.e. electrical efficiency) and by the Green Certificate value. Considering the cost of producing electrical energy, the optimum ratio was 1:2, leading to a cost of 0.26€/kWh, during the investment period, and of 0.14€/kWh after the investment period.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Maria, Francesco & Sordi, Alessio & Micale, Caterina, 2012. "Optimization of Solid State Anaerobic Digestion by inoculum recirculation: The case of an existing Mechanical Biological Treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 462-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:97:y:2012:i:c:p:462-469
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261911008993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    2. Morin, Philippe & Marcos, Bernard & Moresoli, Christine & Laflamme, Claude B., 2010. "Economic and environmental assessment on the energetic valorization of organic material for a municipality in Quebec, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 275-283, January.
    3. Rao, M. S. & Singh, S. P. & Singh, A. K. & Sodha, M. S., 2000. "Bioenergy conversion studies of the organic fraction of MSW: assessment of ultimate bioenergy production potential of municipal garbage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 75-87, May.
    4. Murphy, J.D. & McKeogh, E., 2004. "Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1043-1057.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tonini, Davide & Dorini, Gianluca & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2014. "Bioenergy, material, and nutrients recovery from household waste: Advanced material, substance, energy, and cost flow analysis of a waste refinery process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 64-78.
    2. Chen, Shuxian & Dai, Xiaohu & Yang, Donghai & Dai, Lingling & Hua, Yu, 2023. "Enhancing PHA production through metal-organic frameworks: Mechanisms involving superproton transport and bacterial metabolic pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Estefani Rondón Toro & Ana López Martínez & Amaya Lobo García de Cortázar, 2023. "Sequential Methodology for the Selection of Municipal Waste Treatment Alternatives Applied to a Case Study in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Lin, Long & Xu, Fuqing & Ge, Xumeng & Li, Yebo, 2018. "Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-167.
    5. Li, Chao & Tao, Yu & Fang, Jun & Li, Qiang & Lu, Wenjing, 2020. "Impact of continuous leachate recirculation during solid state anaerobic digestion of Miscanthus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 38-45.
    6. Yao, Yiqing & Zhou, Jianye & An, Lizhe & Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Chen, Shulin & Qiu, Ling, 2018. "Role of soil in improving process performance and methane yield of anaerobic digestion with corn straw as substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 998-1006.
    7. Di Maria, Francesco & Micale, Caterina, 2015. "The contribution to energy production of the aerobic bioconversion of organic waste by an organic Rankine cycle in an integrated anaerobic–aerobic facility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 770-778.
    8. Ripa, M. & Fiorentino, G. & Giani, H. & Clausen, A. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Refuse recovered biomass fuel from municipal solid waste. A life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 211-225.
    9. Di Maria, Francesco & Micale, Caterina, 2017. "Energetic potential of the co-digestion of sludge with bio-waste in existing wastewater treatment plant digesters: A case study of an Italian province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-116.
    10. Di Maria, Francesco & Sordi, Alessio & Cirulli, Giuseppe & Micale, Caterina, 2015. "Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-14.
    11. Zhang, Fang & Zhang, Yan & Chen, Yun & Dai, Kun & van Loosdrecht, Mark C.M. & Zeng, Raymond J., 2015. "Simultaneous production of acetate and methane from glycerol by selective enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in extreme-thermophilic (70°C) mixed culture fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 326-333.
    12. Wu, Duo & Lü, Fan & Shao, Liming & He, Pinjing, 2017. "Effect of cycle digestion time and solid-liquid separation on digestate recirculated one-stage dry anaerobic digestion: Use of intact polar lipid analysis for microbes monitoring to enhance process ev," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 38-48.
    13. Di Maria, Francesco & Micale, Caterina & Sordi, Alessio, 2014. "Electrical energy production from the integrated aerobic-anaerobic treatment of organic waste by ORC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 461-467.
    14. Ortner, Markus & Rachbauer, Lydia & Somitsch, Walter & Fuchs, Werner, 2014. "Can bioavailability of trace nutrients be measured in anaerobic digestion?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 190-198.
    15. Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Peces, M. & Astals, S. & Benavent, J. & Valls, J. & Mata-Alvarez, J., 2014. "Implementation of a prototypal optical sorter as core of the new pre-treatment configuration of a mechanical–biological treatment plant treating OFMSW through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 63-70.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Contini, Stefano, 2018. "Are EU waste-to-energy technologies effective for exploiting the energy in bio-waste?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1557-1572.
    2. Seckin, Candeniz & Bayulken, Ahmet R., 2013. "Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) analysis of municipal wastewater treatment – Determination of environmental remediation cost for municipal wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 55-64.
    3. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    4. Akbulut, Abdullah, 2012. "Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat generation from farm-scale biogas plant: Çiçekdağı case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 381-390.
    5. Yazan, Devrim Murat & Fraccascia, Luca & Mes, Martijn & Zijm, Henk, 2018. "Cooperation in manure-based biogas production networks: An agent-based modeling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 820-833.
    6. Huopana, Tuomas & Song, Han & Kolehmainen, Mikko & Niska, Harri, 2013. "A regional model for sustainable biogas electricity production: A case study from a Finnish province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 676-686.
    7. Thompson, T.M. & Young, B.R. & Baroutian, S., 2020. "Pelagic Sargassum for energy and fertiliser production in the Caribbean: A case study on Barbados," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Bekkering, J. & Hengeveld, E.J. & van Gemert, W.J.T. & Broekhuis, A.A., 2015. "Will implementation of green gas into the gas supply be feasible in the future?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 409-417.
    9. Ciliberti, Carlo & Jordaan, Sarah M. & Smith, Stephen V. & Spatari, Sabrina, 2016. "A life cycle perspective on land use and project economics of electricity from wind and anaerobic digestion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 52-63.
    10. Santagata, R. & Ripa, M. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "An environmental assessment of electricity production from slaughterhouse residues. Linking urban, industrial and waste management systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 175-188.
    11. Rubí Medina-Mijangos & Luis Seguí-Amórtegui, 2020. "Research Trends in the Economic Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1980 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    13. Murphy, J.D. & Power, N., 2009. "Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 25-36, January.
    14. Bidart, Christian & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2014. "Electricity and substitute natural gas generation from the conversion of wastewater treatment plant sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 404-413.
    15. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Massimiliano Boccarossa & Martina Di Addario & Adele Folino & Fabio Tatàno, 2021. "Scenarios of Bioenergy Recovery from Organic Fraction of Residual Municipal Waste in the Marche Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    18. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    19. Uddin, Md Mosleh & Simson, Amanda & Wright, Mark Mba, 2020. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of dimethyl ether production via the bi-reforming pathway for transportation fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    20. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:97:y:2012:i:c:p:462-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.