IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v88y2011i3p755-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective congestion management by modified augmented [epsilon]-constraint method

Author

Listed:
  • Esmaili, Masoud
  • Amjady, Nima
  • Shayanfar, Heidar Ali

Abstract

Congestion management is a vital part of power system operations in recent deregulated electricity markets. However, after relieving congestion, power systems may be operated with a reduced voltage or transient stability margin because of hitting security limits or increasing the contribution of risky participants. Therefore, power system stability margins should be considered within the congestion management framework. The multi-objective congestion management provides not only more security but also more flexibility than single-objective methods. In this paper, a multi-objective congestion management framework is presented while simultaneously optimizing the competing objective functions of congestion management cost, voltage security, and dynamic security. The proposed multi-objective framework, called modified augmented [epsilon]-constraint method, is based on the augmented [epsilon]-constraint technique hybridized by the weighting method. The proposed framework generates candidate solutions for the multi-objective problem including only efficient Pareto surface enhancing the competitiveness and economic effectiveness of the power market. Besides, the relative importance of the objective functions is explicitly modeled in the proposed framework. Results of testing the proposed multi-objective congestion management method on the New-England test system are presented and compared with those of the previous single objective and multi-objective techniques in detail. These comparisons confirm the efficiency of the developed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmaili, Masoud & Amjady, Nima & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali, 2011. "Multi-objective congestion management by modified augmented [epsilon]-constraint method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 755-766, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:3:p:755-766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(10)00379-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabiee, A. & Shayanfar, H. & Amjady, N., 2009. "Multiobjective clearing of reactive power market in deregulated power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1555-1564, September.
    2. Druce, Donald J., 2007. "Modelling the transition from cost-based to bid-based pricing in a deregulated electricity-market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(12), pages 1210-1225, December.
    3. Esmaili, Masoud & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Amjady, Nima, 2009. "Multi-objective congestion management incorporating voltage and transient stabilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1401-1412.
    4. Esmaili, Masoud & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Amjady, Nima, 2010. "Congestion management enhancing transient stability of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 971-981, March.
    5. Aghaei, J. & Shayanfar, H.A. & Amjady, N., 2009. "Joint market clearing in a stochastic framework considering power system security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1675-1682, September.
    6. Vahidinasab, V. & Jadid, S., 2009. "Multiobjective environmental/techno-economic approach for strategic bidding in energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 496-504, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esmaili, Masoud & Ebadi, Fatemeh & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Jadid, Shahram, 2013. "Congestion management in hybrid power markets using modified Benders decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1004-1012.
    2. Yu, Jianwu & Luo, Hong & Hu, Junzhi & Nguyen, Thai Vinh & Lu, Yuetuo, 2019. "Reconstruction of high-speed cam curve based on high-order differential interpolation and shape adjustment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 272-281.
    3. Han, Bing & Zhang, Ying & Wang, Song & Park, Yongshin, 2023. "The efficient and stable planning for interrupted supply chain with dual‐sourcing strategy: a robust optimization approach considering decision maker's risk attitude," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Hosseini, Seyyed Ahmad & Amjady, Nima & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2016. "A new multi-objective solution approach to solve transmission congestion management problem of energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 462-471.
    5. Sahebjamnia, Navid & Torabi, S. Ali & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2018. "Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-83.
    6. Yılmaz Balaman, Şebnem & Scott, James & Matopoulos, Aristides & Wright, Daniel G., 2019. "Incentivising bioenergy production: Economic and environmental insights from a regional optimization methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 867-880.
    7. Tofighi, S. & Torabi, S.A. & Mansouri, S.A., 2016. "Humanitarian logistics network design under mixed uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 239-250.
    8. Xin Wen & Qiong Chen & Yu-Qi Yin & Yui-yip Lau, 2023. "Green Vessel Scheduling with Weather Impact and Emission Control Area Consideration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosseini, Seyyed Ahmad & Amjady, Nima & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2016. "A new multi-objective solution approach to solve transmission congestion management problem of energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 462-471.
    2. Esmaili, Masoud & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Amjady, Nima, 2010. "Congestion management enhancing transient stability of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 971-981, March.
    3. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2010. "A paper on the unsettled question of Turkish electricity market: Balancing and settlement system (Part I)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 251-258, January.
    4. Tabandeh, Abbas & Abdollahi, Amir & Rashidinejad, Masoud, 2016. "Reliability constrained congestion management with uncertain negawatt demand response firms considering repairable advanced metering infrastructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 213-228.
    5. Kargarian, A. & Raoofat, M. & Mohammadi, M., 2011. "Reactive power market management considering voltage control area reserve and system security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3832-3840.
    6. Saraswat, Amit & Saini, Ashish & Saxena, Ajay Kumar, 2013. "A novel multi-zone reactive power market settlement model: A pareto-optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-100.
    7. Reddy, S. Surender & Abhyankar, A.R. & Bijwe, P.R., 2011. "Reactive power price clearing using multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3579-3589.
    8. Canizes, Bruno & Soares, João & Faria, Pedro & Vale, Zita, 2013. "Mixed integer non-linear programming and Artificial Neural Network based approach to ancillary services dispatch in competitive electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 261-270.
    9. Behrangrad, Mahdi & Sugihara, Hideharu & Funaki, Tsuyoshi, 2011. "Effect of optimal spinning reserve requirement on system pollution emission considering reserve supplying demand response in the electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2548-2558, July.
    10. Fernández-Blanco, Ricardo & Arroyo, José M. & Alguacil, Natalia, 2014. "Consumer payment minimization under uniform pricing: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 676-686.
    11. Aghaei, J. & Shayanfar, H.A. & Amjady, N., 2009. "Joint market clearing in a stochastic framework considering power system security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1675-1682, September.
    12. Liu, Zhen & Zhang, Xiliang & Lieu, Jenny, 2010. "Design of the incentive mechanism in electricity auction market based on the signaling game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1813-1819.
    13. Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Wang, Jianhui & Chen, Laijun & Mei, Shengwei & Yuan, Tiejiang, 2016. "Robust environmental-economic dispatch incorporating wind power generation and carbon capture plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 674-684.
    14. Di Somma, M. & Graditi, G. & Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Shafie-khah, M. & Siano, P., 2018. "Stochastic optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources with renewables considering economic and environmental aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 272-287.
    15. Cao, M.F. & Huang, G.H. & Lin, Q.G., 2010. "Integer programming with random-boundary intervals for planning municipal power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2506-2516, August.
    16. Morales, J.M. & Mínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J., 2010. "A methodology to generate statistically dependent wind speed scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 843-855, March.
    17. Lyle, Matthew R. & Elliott, Robert J., 2009. "A 'simple' hybrid model for power derivatives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 757-767, September.
    18. Vijay, Avinash & Fouquet, Nicolas & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam, 2017. "The value of electricity and reserve services in low carbon electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 111-123.
    19. Ghadikolaei, Hadi Moghimi & Tajik, Elham & Aghaei, Jamshid & Charwand, Mansour, 2012. "Integrated day-ahead and hour-ahead operation model of discos in retail electricity markets considering DGs and CO2 emission penalty cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 174-185.
    20. Panigrahi, B.K. & Ravikumar Pandi, V. & Das, Sanjoy & Das, Swagatam, 2010. "Multiobjective fuzzy dominance based bacterial foraging algorithm to solve economic emission dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4761-4770.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:3:p:755-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.