IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v378y2025ipas030626192402107x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance study and LCA of a ZigZag PV noise barrier: Towards mass-customization of IIPV applications

Author

Listed:
  • Colberts, Fallon
  • Bouguerra, Sara
  • Wieclawski, Arnaud
  • Paesa, Marta Casasola
  • Brand, Wim
  • Mullenders, Sven
  • Ahmed, Hareim
  • de Jong, Richard
  • Vavilkin, Tatjana
  • van de Wall, Wim
  • Mass-Protzen, Christian
  • Bergman, Jeroen
  • Boumans, Jörgen
  • Daenen, Michaël
  • Vroon, Zeger

Abstract

Photovoltaic noise barriers (PVNB) offer dual functionality in reducing traffic noise and generating renewable electricity. In this research, the potential of ZigZag PVNBs has been investigated. The ZigZag Solar product, developed by Wallvision, has proven to offer multiple advantages in energy yield and aesthetics for building façade applications. For noise barrier applications, the ZigZag structure could offer interesting features in safety and noise cancellation (obtained by filling the ZigZag construction with Rockwool material) on top of the advantages in aesthetics and energy yield. A ZigZag PVNB has been designed and constructed at the Brightlands Chemelot Campus in Geleen, after which the electrical performance has been automatically monitored under Dutch climate conditions. The measurements have been compared to simulated data, which allowed optimization of the model. As Rockwool material is used in the ZigZag construction, the thermal model had to be optimized to reduce significant differences in measured and simulated VMPP data. Temperature measurements by a novel Fiber Bragg technology revealed that temperature differences between measured cell temperature and input temperature for the simulations are between 10 and 20 °C. After optimizing the thermal model, the power output of the ZigZag PVNB could be predicted more accurately, resulting in a yearly potential energy yield up to 1066 kWh/kWp. Measured data over the period June 2023 till April 2024 showed an energy yield up to 873 kWh/kWp. A deviation of 18 % between measured yearly energy yield can be related to system losses such as cabling and inverters. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of several configurations of a global system, including concrete infrastructure, solar panels, ZigZag cassettes, cabling and converters shows a Global Warming Potential (GWP) score varying from 190 to 290 CO2 eq/kWh, according to the models developed in this study, indicating its interest compared to the Dutch and German electricity mixes. In addition, the energy required to produce and install the ZigZag PVNB system at various lengths has a predicted payback time of 6–10 years (maximum 30 % of the total expected lifetime). The balance of system, in specific the DC/DC converters followed and battery system) followed by the concrete element on which the ZigZag PVNB was mounted are the largest contributors to the carbon footprint of the ZigZag PVNB demonstrator. The carbon footprint could potentially be reduced by using cleaner battery technologies or energy storage systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Colberts, Fallon & Bouguerra, Sara & Wieclawski, Arnaud & Paesa, Marta Casasola & Brand, Wim & Mullenders, Sven & Ahmed, Hareim & de Jong, Richard & Vavilkin, Tatjana & van de Wall, Wim & Mass-Protzen, 2025. "Performance study and LCA of a ZigZag PV noise barrier: Towards mass-customization of IIPV applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s030626192402107x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192402107X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wadhawan, Siddharth R. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2017. "Power and energy potential of mass-scale photovoltaic noise barrier deployment: A case study for the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 125-132.
    2. Bhandari, Khagendra P. & Collier, Jennifer M. & Ellingson, Randy J. & Apul, Defne S., 2015. "Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 133-141.
    3. Verachtert, Els & Mayeres, Inge & Vermeiren, Karolien & Van der Meulen, Maarten & Vanhulsel, Marlies & Vanderstraeten, Geoffrey & Loris, Isabelle & Mertens, Geert & Engelen, Guy & Poelmans, Lien, 2023. "Mapping regional accessibility of public transport and services in support of spatial planning: A case study in Flanders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Zhong, Teng & Zhang, Kai & Chen, Min & Wang, Yijie & Zhu, Rui & Zhang, Zhixin & Zhou, Zixuan & Qian, Zhen & Lv, Guonian & Yan, Jinyue, 2021. "Assessment of solar photovoltaic potentials on urban noise barriers using street-view imagery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 181-194.
    6. Zhang, Kai & Wang, Dajiang & Chen, Min & Zhu, Rui & Zhang, Fan & Zhong, Teng & Qian, Zhen & Wang, Yazhou & Li, Hengyue & Wang, Yijie & Lü, Guonian & Yan, Jinyue, 2024. "Power generation assessment of photovoltaic noise barriers across 52 major Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    7. Jérôme Payet & Titouan Greffe, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of New High Concentration Photovoltaic (HCPV) Modules and Multi-Junction Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Jixing & Tang, Haida & Lyu, Yuanli & Liu, Wenjie & Tian, Xiangning & Li, Chunying, 2024. "Energy, environmental and economic performance of bi-facial photovoltaic noise barrier applied in city scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    2. Maharjan, Prapti & Hauck, Mara & Kirkels, Arjan & Buettner, Benjamin & de Coninck, Heleen, 2024. "Deriving experience curves: A structured and critical approach applied to PV sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Zhang, Kai & Chen, Min & Yang, Yue & Zhong, Teng & Zhu, Rui & Zhang, Fan & Qian, Zhen & Lü, Guonian & Yan, Jinyue, 2022. "Quantifying the photovoltaic potential of highways in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Zhang, Kai & Wang, Dajiang & Chen, Min & Zhu, Rui & Zhang, Fan & Zhong, Teng & Qian, Zhen & Wang, Yazhou & Li, Hengyue & Wang, Yijie & Lü, Guonian & Yan, Jinyue, 2024. "Power generation assessment of photovoltaic noise barriers across 52 major Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    5. Mengjin Hu & Xiaoyang Song & Zhongxu Bao & Zhao Liu & Mengju Wei & Yaohuan Huang, 2022. "Evaluation of the Economic Potential of Photovoltaic Power Generation in Road Spaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Kakoulaki, G. & Szabo, S. & Fahl F, F. & Taylor, N. & Gracia-Amillo, A. & Kenny, R. & Ulpiani, G. & Chatzipanagi, A. & Gkoumas, K. & Jäger-Waldau, A., 2024. "European transport infrastructure as a solar photovoltaic energy hub," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Charles Neumeyer & Robert Goldston, 2016. "Dynamic EROI Assessment of the IPCC 21st Century Electricity Production Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Aleksander Jakimowicz, 2022. "The Future of the Energy Sector and the Global Economy: Prosumer Capitalism and What Comes Next," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Sanzana Tabassum & Tanvin Rahman & Ashraf Ul Islam & Sumayya Rahman & Debopriya Roy Dipta & Shidhartho Roy & Naeem Mohammad & Nafiu Nawar & Eklas Hossain, 2021. "Solar Energy in the United States: Development, Challenges and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-65, December.
    11. Khalifa Mohammed Al-Sobai & Shaligram Pokharel & Galal M. Abdella, 2020. "Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca Gabriela Petrescu & Eugenia Grecu & Marius Petrescu, 2017. "Optimizing the Renewable Energy Potential: Myth or Future Trend in Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post Growth Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 719-749, May.
    14. Thopil, George Alex & Sachse, Christiaan Eddie & Lalk, Jörg & Thopil, Miriam Sara, 2020. "Techno-economic performance comparison of crystalline and thin film PV panels under varying meteorological conditions: A high solar resource southern hemisphere case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Ron Swenson, 2016. "The Solarevolution: Much More with Way Less, Right Now—The Disruptive Shift to Renewables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Haneen Abuzaid & Fatin Samara, 2022. "Environmental and Economic Impact Assessments of a Photovoltaic Rooftop System in the United Arab Emirates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Joshua M. Pearce, 2022. "Agrivoltaics in Ontario Canada: Promise and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Anna Furberg & Rickard Arvidsson & Sverker Molander, 2022. "A practice‐based framework for defining functional units in comparative life cycle assessments of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 718-730, June.
    19. Dupont, Elise & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2018. "Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 322-338.
    20. Gao, Cheng-kang & Na, Hong-ming & Song, Kai-hui & Dyer, Noel & Tian, Fan & Xu, Qing-jiang & Xing, Yu-hong, 2019. "Environmental impact analysis of power generation from biomass and wind farms in different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 307-317.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s030626192402107x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.