IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v375y2024ics030626192401496x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of carbon leakage from energy-saving targets: A moderating effect based on new-energy model cities

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Ziling
  • Wang, Zhe
  • Ma, Mengjuan
  • Ma, Lili

Abstract

In response to the threat of climate change and to accelerate the process of carbon neutrality, China has implemented energy-saving targets that take into account the level of regional economic development. This approach does reduce overall carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions but is accompanied by significant carbon leakage. However, carbon leakage between cities has shown a downward trend since 2015. One possible reason is that the construction of new-energy model cities (NEMC), which began in 2014, has facilitated the promotion and application of renewable energy. Renewable energy, characterized by its wide distribution and “zero carbon” features, ensures a stable energy supply while reducing CO2 emissions. Its promotion and application have effectively mitigated the carbon leakage caused by energy-saving targets. To verify this conjecture, this paper utilizes data from 298 cities during the period of 2005–2021, establishes a fixed-effect model and a moderating effect model, and systematically examines the carbon leakage effect of energy-saving targets and the moderating effect of NEMC. The findings reveal that regions with strict energy-saving targets can increase CO2 emissions in regions with lax energy-saving targets through industrial transfer, while NEMC can attenuate the carbon leakage effect of these targets. Further analysis indicates that the mechanism of carbon leakage between regions is significantly influenced by geographic, economic, and energy linkages. In particular, cities with strict energy-saving targets tend to choose cities with close geographic proximity and strong energy links as their first choice for industrial transfer, leading to carbon leakage in these cities, while NEMC can effectively reduce carbon leakage through the path of industrial transfer. It is worth noting, however, that mere economic links between cities with lax energy-saving targets and cities with strict energy-saving targets do not lead to industrial transfer; only close economic links become important areas for industrial transfer, leading to carbon leakage. This paper addresses the critical issue of inter-city carbon leakage, which is of great significance in promoting the process of carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Ziling & Wang, Zhe & Ma, Mengjuan & Ma, Lili, 2024. "The impact of carbon leakage from energy-saving targets: A moderating effect based on new-energy model cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s030626192401496x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192401496X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Liu, Xiaoqian & Wang, Chang'an & Wu, Haitao & Yang, Cunyi & Albitar, Khaldoon, 2023. "The impact of the new energy demonstration city construction on energy consumption intensity: Exploring the sustainable potential of China's firms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Jean Pierre Ponssard & Neil Walker, 2008. "EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(5), pages 467-493, September.
    4. Shuai, Chenyang & Shen, Liyin & Jiao, Liudan & Wu, Ya & Tan, Yongtao, 2017. "Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: Evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 310-325.
    5. Chen, Zhiwei & Zhao, Weicheng & Lin, Xiaoyong & Han, Yongming & Hu, Xuan & Yuan, Kui & Geng, Zhiqiang, 2024. "Load prediction of integrated energy systems for energy saving and carbon emission based on novel multi-scale fusion convolutional neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    6. Zhao, Xiaofan & Li, Huimin & Wu, Liang & Qi, Ye, 2014. "Implementation of energy-saving policies in China: How local governments assisted industrial enterprises in achieving energy-saving targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 170-184.
    7. Wang, Maria & Kuusi, Tero, 2024. "Trade flows, carbon leakage, and the EU Emissions Trading System," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Reyer Gerlagh & Onno Kuik, 2007. "Carbon Leakage with International Technology Spillovers," Working Papers 2007.33, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid, 2017. "Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 35-46.
    10. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    11. Tan, Xiujie & Liu, Yu & Cui, Jingbo & Su, Bin, 2018. "Assessment of carbon leakage by channels: An approach combining CGE model and decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 535-545.
    12. Jarke, Johannes & Perino, Grischa, 2017. "Do renewable energy policies reduce carbon emissions? On caps and inter-industry leakage," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 102-124.
    13. Du, Zhili & Wang, Yao, 2022. "Does energy-saving and emission reduction policy affects carbon reduction performance? A quasi-experimental evidence in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    14. Hou, Yaru & Yang, Mian & Ma, Yanran & Zhang, Haiying, 2024. "Study on city's energy transition: Evidence from the establishment of the new energy demonstration cities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Zhang, Qianxiang & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "What does clean energy attract? Evidence from the transfer structure of energy-intensive projects in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Moran, Daniel D. & Lenzen, Manfred & Kanemoto, Keiichiro & Geschke, Arne, 2013. "Does ecologically unequal exchange occur?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 177-186.
    17. Wu, Haoyi & Guo, Huanxiu & Zhang, Bing & Bu, Maoliang, 2017. "Westward movement of new polluting firms in China: Pollution reduction mandates and location choice," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 119-138.
    18. Yu, Shasha & Yuan, Xuanyu & Yao, Xinyan & Lei, Ming, 2022. "Carbon leakage and low-carbon performance: Heterogeneity of responsibility perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannuo Qiu & Bian Yang & Ying Liu & Linping Wang, 2024. "Emissions Reduction Effects and Carbon Leakage Risks of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy: An Empirical Study Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Xian & Yu, Lihong, 2024. "Do China's pilot emissions trading schemes lead to domestic carbon leakage? Perspective from the firm relocation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Christoph Böhringer & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Halvor Storrøsten, 2021. "Smart hedging against carbon leakage [An overview of the GTAP 9 data base]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 36(107), pages 439-484.
    3. Fabio Antoniou & Panos Hatzipanayotou & Nikos Tsakiris, 2024. "Regulatory Stringency and Emission Leakage Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(6), pages 1407-1424, June.
    4. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2022. "Europe beyond coal – An economic and climate impact assessment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Meunier, Guy & Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, 2014. "Capacity decisions with demand fluctuations and carbon leakage," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 436-454.
    6. Fan, Wei & Li, Li & Wang, Feiran & Li, Ding, 2020. "Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Pan, Wenqi & Kim, Man-Keun & Ning, Zhuo & Yang, Hongqiang, 2020. "Carbon leakage in energy/forest sectors and climate policy implications using meta-analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Monjon, Stéphanie & Quirion, Philippe, 2011. "Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1957-1971, September.
    9. Lai, Aolin & Wang, Qunwei & Cui, Lianbiao, 2022. "Can market segmentation lead to green paradox? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7346 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Nicole A. MATHYS & Jaime DE MELO, 2010. "Trade and Climate Change: The Challenges Ahead," Working Papers P14, FERDI.
    12. Gabriela Michalek & Reimund Schwarze, 2015. "Carbon leakage: pollution, trade or politics?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1471-1492, December.
    13. Zhang, Shengling & Wang, Yao & Hao, Yu & Liu, Zhiwei, 2021. "Shooting two hawks with one arrow: Could China's emission trading scheme promote green development efficiency and regional carbon equality?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Jianhui Cong & Huimin Wang & Xiaoxiao Hu & Yongbin Zhao & Yingying Wang & Weiqiang Zhang & Ling Zhang, 2023. "Does China’s Pilot Carbon Market Cause Carbon Leakage? New Evidence from the Chemical, Building Material, and Metal Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Ulrik Beck & Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2020. "Endogenizing the Cap in a Cap-and-Trade System: Assessing the Agreement on EU ETS Phase 4," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 781-811, December.
    16. Bin Fan & Yun Zhang & Xiuzhen Li & Xiao Miao, 2019. "Trade Openness and Carbon Leakage: Empirical Evidence from China’s Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Wu, Libo & Zhou, Ying & Qian, Haoqi, 2022. "Global actions under the Paris agreement: Tracing the carbon leakage flow and pursuing countermeasures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    19. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Kangyin Dong & Yalin Han & Yue Dou & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Moving toward carbon neutrality: Assessing natural gas import security and its impact on CO2 emissions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 751-770, August.
    21. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2019. "Phase-out of 'coal to power' in an ETS," CESifo Working Paper Series 7554, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s030626192401496x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.