IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v348y2023ics0306261923009388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioenergy production from pretreated rice straw in Nigeria: An analysis of novel three-stage anaerobic digestion for hydrogen and methane co-generation

Author

Listed:
  • Ekwenna, Emeka Boniface
  • Wang, Yaodong
  • Roskilly, Anthony

Abstract

The response to Nigeria's energy inadequacies and waste management issues is projected in this research to be achieved with hydrogen and methane co-produced from pretreated (PT) rice straw (RS) in a three-stage digestion process. This study also demonstrated a novel pretreatment (PTM) agent to improve biological energy recovery from RS. The objectives were accomplished using acidogenic and methanogenic procedures in batch, semi-continuous and continuous systems after pretreating RS with chemical/potash extract (PE) followed by a biological agent. At the same time, the energy assessments were done using data from the laboratory study and the literature. The research findings indicated that at the acidogenesis stage, specific hydrogen yield was insignificant when chemical agents and PE were employed alone. However, the daily H2 production increased when the PT RS residues were enzymatically hydrolysed with NaOH-PT (114 NmL H2 g−1 TS d−1) and PE-PT (103 NmL H2 g−1 TS d−1) RS substrates having the highest values at steady states and raw RS producing the least (30 NmL H2 g−1 TS d−1). In the methanogenesis phase, chemical/ PE PTM followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of RS improved the daily specific methane production by 18%, 31.7% and 41.5% for HCl, PE and NaOH-PT RS residues. The methane production efficiency was 80% for NaOH, 75% for PE, and 68% for HCl RS PT samples, while the raw RS was 48%. The total output energy expressed in electricity and thermal production using combined cooling, heat, and power (CCHP) showed that NaOH and PE-PT RS digesters gave the highest electricity (892.43 and 852.00 KWhelect. tonne-1 TS) and thermal (1194.10 and 1140 KWhtherm. tonne-1 TS) yield respectively. Similarly, the cooling fluid in KWhcool produced per tonne of TS RS was 835.57, 798.00 and 741.66 for NaOH, PE and HCl PT RS samples. Finally, whereas the Firmicutes, especially the Clostridium, Ruminococcus and Thermoanaerobacterium, were the dominant microbial community in acidogenic digestates, the Euryarchaeota typified by Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta were the principal phyla for most methanogenic reactors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekwenna, Emeka Boniface & Wang, Yaodong & Roskilly, Anthony, 2023. "Bioenergy production from pretreated rice straw in Nigeria: An analysis of novel three-stage anaerobic digestion for hydrogen and methane co-generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:348:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923009388
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923009388
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akobi, Chinaza & Yeo, Hyeongu & Hafez, Hisham & Nakhla, George, 2016. "Single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of extruded lignocellulosic biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 548-559.
    2. Asma Sattar & Chaudhry Arslan & Changying Ji & Sumiyya Sattar & Irshad Ali Mari & Haroon Rashid & Fariha Ilyas, 2016. "Comparing the Bio-Hydrogen Production Potential of Pretreated Rice Straw Co-Digested with Seeded Sludge Using an Anaerobic Bioreactor under Mesophilic Thermophilic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    4. Kumar, G. & Bakonyi, P. & Periyasamy, S. & Kim, S.H. & Nemestóthy, N. & Bélafi-Bakó, K., 2015. "Lignocellulose biohydrogen: Practical challenges and recent progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 728-737.
    5. Mustafa, Ahmed M. & Poulsen, Tjalfe G. & Sheng, Kuichuan, 2016. "Fungal pretreatment of rice straw with Pleurotus ostreatus and Trichoderma reesei to enhance methane production under solid-state anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 661-671.
    6. Jiang, Xinyuan & Sommer, Sven G. & Christensen, Knud V., 2011. "A review of the biogas industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6073-6081, October.
    7. Gatugel Usman, Zubairu & Abbasoglu, Serkan & Tekbiyik Ersoy, Neyre & Fahrioglu, Murat, 2015. "Transforming the Nigerian power sector for sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 429-437.
    8. Li, Jianzheng & Liu, Wenbin & Meng, Jia & Zhao, Lei & Li, Jiuling & Zheng, Min, 2022. "Mesothermal pretreatment using FeCl3 enhances methane production from rice straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 670-677.
    9. An, Qian & Cheng, Jing-Rong & Wang, Yu-Tao & Zhu, Ming-Jun, 2020. "Performance and energy recovery of single and two stage biogas production from paper sludge: Clostridium thermocellum augmentation and microbial community analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 214-222.
    10. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    11. Parawira, W & Murto, M & Zvauya, R & Mattiasson, B, 2004. "Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1811-1823.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, Yongming & Li, Zhiyi & Wei, Tingting & Zuo, Xiaoyu & Liu, Min & Ma, Bo & Geng, Zhiqiang, 2024. "Production capacity prediction based response conditions optimization of straw reforming using attention-enhanced convolutional LSTM integrating data expansion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakonyi, Péter & Buitrón, Germán & Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2017. "A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 813-823.
    2. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.
    3. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    4. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    5. Li, Heng & Chen, Zheng & Fu, Dun & Wang, Yuanpeng & Zheng, Yanmei & Li, Qingbiao, 2020. "Improved ADM1 for modelling C, N, P fates in anaerobic digestion process of pig manure and optimization approaches to biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2330-2336.
    6. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    7. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Perednis, Eugenijus & Dzenajavičienė, Eugenija Farida, 2019. "Analysis of biodegradable waste use for energy generation in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 559-567.
    8. Lina Luo & Youpei Qu & Weijia Gong & Liyuan Qin & Wenzhe Li & Yong Sun, 2021. "Effect of Particle Size on the Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion Characteristics of Whole Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Soares, Juliana Ferreira & Confortin, Tássia Carla & Todero, Izelmar & Mayer, Flávio Dias & Mazutti, Marcio Antonio, 2020. "Dark fermentative biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: Technological challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Elbeshbishy, Elsayed & Dhar, Bipro Ranjan & Nakhla, George & Lee, Hyung-Sool, 2017. "A critical review on inhibition of dark biohydrogen fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 656-668.
    11. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    12. Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Mudhoo, Ackmez & Rene, Eldon R. & Saratale, Ganesh Dattatraya & Kobayashi, Takuro & Xu, Kaiqin & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Kim, Dong-Hoon, 2017. "Fermentative hydrogen production using lignocellulose biomass: An overview of pre-treatment methods, inhibitor effects and detoxification experiences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 28-42.
    13. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Ankita Das & Sandeep Das & Nandita Das & Prisha Pandey & Birson Ingti & Vladimir Panchenko & Vadim Bolshev & Andrey Kovalev & Piyush Pandey, 2023. "Advancements and Innovations in Harnessing Microbial Processes for Enhanced Biogas Production from Waste Materials," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-34, August.
    15. Wandera, Simon M. & Qiao, Wei & Algapani, Dalal E. & Bi, Shaojie & Yin, Dongmin & Qi, Xiangyang & Liu, Yueling & Dach, Jacek & Dong, Renjie, 2018. "Searching for possibilities to improve the performance of full scale agricultural biogas plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 720-727.
    16. Trchounian, Karen & Trchounian, Armen, 2015. "Hydrogen production from glycerol by Escherichia coli and other bacteria: An overview and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 174-184.
    17. Antony V. Samrot & Deenadhayalan Rajalakshmi & Mahendran Sathiyasree & Subramanian Saigeetha & Kasirajan Kasipandian & Nachiyar Valli & Nellore Jayshree & Pandurangan Prakash & Nagarajan Shobana, 2023. "A Review on Biohydrogen Sources, Production Routes, and Its Application as a Fuel Cell," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Algieri, Angelo & Andiloro, Serafina & Tamburino, Vincenzo & Zema, Demetrio Antonio, 2019. "The potential of agricultural residues for energy production in Calabria (Southern Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Chen, Bin & Chen, Shaoqing, 2013. "Life cycle assessment of coupling household biogas production to agricultural industry: A case study of biogas-linked persimmon cultivation and processing system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 707-716.
    20. Huang, Xianlei & Wang, Shu & Shi, Zuliang & Fang, Linna & Yin, Changbin, 2022. "Challenges and strategies for biogas production in the circular agricultural waste utilization model: A case study in rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:348:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923009388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.