IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v275y2020ics0306261920309247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of low-temperature geothermal systems: Considerations of thermal anomalies, geochemistry, and local assets

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, Kayla R.
  • Holländer, Hartmut M.

Abstract

Low-temperature geothermal power plants have great potential to provide baseload electricity worldwide. However, the technology is new and untested, and the systems require a significant financial investment. Site-specific feasibility studies are required to draw together available data and inform developers of production potential and challenges. This study applies coupled thermal, hydraulic, and geochemical modeling to characterize a horizontal geothermal well system in the Williston Basin. This study targeted thermal anomalies overlying 370 m thick halite and dolomite formations from the Devonian period. The halite and dolomite produced a 6°C thermal anomaly, or 16°C km−1 increase in the thermal gradient. A >5.0 MW power plant was achieved when targeting the Dawson Bay formation. A fractured, horizontal well in the Bakken formation was re-entered for injection, providing a savings of up to 40% of drilling costs. The geochemical analysis allowed for the calculation of potential precipitates in the production casing, and consideration of mitigation methods. In addition, the co-production of lithium was identified as potentially profitable in the Dawson Bay Formation. Considering the available resources and assets provided unique data to inform the development of a geothermal system in the Williston Basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, Kayla R. & Holländer, Hartmut M., 2020. "Feasibility of low-temperature geothermal systems: Considerations of thermal anomalies, geochemistry, and local assets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:275:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920309247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920309247
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hofmann, Hannes & Weides, Simon & Babadagli, Tayfun & Zimmermann, Günter & Moeck, Inga & Majorowicz, Jacek & Unsworth, Martyn, 2014. "Potential for enhanced geothermal systems in Alberta, Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 578-591.
    2. Clauser, Christoph & Ewert, Markus, 2018. "The renewables cost challenge: Levelized cost of geothermal electric energy compared to other sources of primary energy – Review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3683-3693.
    3. Xia, Yidong & Plummer, Mitchell & Mattson, Earl & Podgorney, Robert & Ghassemi, Ahmad, 2017. "Design, modeling, and evaluation of a doublet heat extraction model in enhanced geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 232-247.
    4. Feng, Guanhong & Xu, Tianfu & Gherardi, Fabrizio & Jiang, Zhenjiao & Bellani, Stefano, 2017. "Geothermal assessment of the Pisa plain, Italy: Coupled thermal and hydraulic modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 416-427.
    5. Majorowicz, Jacek & Moore, Michal, 2014. "The feasibility and potential of geothermal heat in the deep Alberta foreland basin-Canada for CO2 savings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 541-549.
    6. Kazemi, A.R. & Mahbaz, S.B. & Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Performance Evaluation of an Enhanced Geothermal System in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Shejiao Wang & Jiahong Yan & Feng Li & Junwen Hu & Kewen Li, 2016. "Exploitation and Utilization of Oilfield Geothermal Resources in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Dolter, Brett & Rivers, Nicholas, 2018. "The cost of decarbonizing the Canadian electricity system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 135-148.
    9. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Herber, Rien, 2017. "Salt intrusions providing a new geothermal exploration target for higher energy recovery at shallower depths," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 658-670.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Saeid, Sanaz & Doonechaly, Nima Gholizadeh, 2021. "The fault plane as the main fluid pathway: Geothermal field development options under subsurface and operational uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 927-946.
    2. Santos, L. & Dahi Taleghani, A. & Elsworth, D., 2022. "Repurposing abandoned wells for geothermal energy: Current status and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1288-1302.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng & Yang, Ruiyue & Wang, Gaosheng & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng & Lyu, Zehao, 2018. "Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 325-337.
    2. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    3. Han, Songcai & Cheng, Yuanfang & Gao, Qi & Yan, Chuanliang & Zhang, Jincheng, 2020. "Numerical study on heat extraction performance of multistage fracturing Enhanced Geothermal System," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1214-1226.
    4. Wang, Kai-Hua & Liu, Lu & Li, Xin & Oana-Ramona, Lobonţ, 2022. "Do oil price shocks drive unemployment? Evidence from Russia and Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    5. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    6. Schiffner, Daniel & Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Lefsrud, Lianne & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment for heating cattle feed water with low-temperature geothermal energy: A case study from central Alberta, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1105-1120.
    7. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Deo, Milind, 2019. "Effect of different flow schemes on heat recovery from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 667-676.
    8. Asai, Pranay & Podgorney, Robert & McLennan, John & Deo, Milind & Moore, Joseph, 2022. "Analytical model for fluid flow distribution in an Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 821-831.
    9. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    10. Zolfaghari, Seyed Mohammad & Soltani, M. & Hosseinpour, Morteza & Nathwani, Jatin, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of geothermal energy integration with heavy oil upgrading in hot compressed water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Majorowicz, Jacek & Grasby, Stephen E., 2019. "Deep geothermal energy in Canadian sedimentary basins VS. Fossils based energy we try to replace – Exergy [KJ/KG] compared," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 259-277.
    12. Dolter, Brett & Fellows, G. Kent & Rivers, Nicholas, 2022. "The cost effectiveness of new reservoir hydroelectricity: British Columbia’s Site C project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Stringer, Thomas & Joanis, Marcelin, 2022. "Assessing energy transition costs: Sub-national challenges in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Aliyu, Musa D. & Chen, Hua-Peng, 2018. "Enhanced geothermal system modelling with multiple pore media: Thermo-hydraulic coupled processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 931-948.
    15. Hou, Xinglan & Zhong, Xiuping & Nie, Shuaishuai & Wang, Yafei & Tu, Guigang & Ma, Yingrui & Liu, Kunyan & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Study on the heat recovery behavior of horizontal well systems in the Qiabuqia geothermal area of the Gonghe Basin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Martina Gizzi & Federico Vagnon & Glenda Taddia & Stefano Lo Russo, 2023. "A Review of Groundwater Heat Pump Systems in the Italian Framework: Technological Potential and Environmental Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Zuo, Yinhui & Sun, Yigao & Zhang, Luquan & Zhang, Chao & Wang, Yingchun & Jiang, Guangzheng & Wang, Xiaoguang & Zhang, Tao & Cui, Longqing, 2024. "Geothermal resource evaluation in the Sichuan Basin and suggestions for the development and utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. Lambert, Mathieu & Hassani, Rachid, 2023. "Diesel genset optimization in remote microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:275:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920309247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.