IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v254y2019ics0306261919313418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of thermochemically liquefied biomass products and heat of formation for process energy assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Lozano, E.M.
  • Pedersen, T.H.
  • Rosendahl, L.A.

Abstract

A generic approach is proposed for the estimation of advanced biocrudes properties from liquefied biomass and the enthalpy of formation of biomass feedstocks applicable to the modeling of biomass conversion processes where the exact stoichiometry and kinetics are unknown, such as pyrolysis, solvolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction. The enthalpy of formation of the biomass is estimated through a direct correlation based on ultimate and proximate analysis, whose parameters can easily be fitted with experimental data available from sources such as the Phillys database for different biomass types and implemented in process simulators such as Aspen Plus®. For the biocrude modeling, a multi-objective optimization model is proposed that refines the selection of model compounds to match measured bulk thermochemical and physical properties. Parameter fitting and multi-objective optimization were both performed in Matlab® and the codes are available in the supplementary material. As a case study, the optimization model was applied to two different oils obtained via hydrothermal liquefaction and pyrolysis of woody biomass. The first case was further studied in order to estimate the impact of the proposed models in the energy requirements. The process was implemented in Aspen Plus® but the methodology is applicable to other simulation tools. The results show that the methods for estimating enthalpies of formation have a high impact on the energy balance and consequently the models developed allow a more accurate estimation of the energy requirement in the reactor. This is a key element in making accurate heat integration and techno-economic analyses of thermochemical conversion processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lozano, E.M. & Pedersen, T.H. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2019. "Modeling of thermochemically liquefied biomass products and heat of formation for process energy assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313418
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919313418
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adeyemi, Idowu & Janajreh, Isam, 2015. "Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 77-84.
    2. Tzanetis, Konstantinos F. & Posada, John A. & Ramirez, Andrea, 2017. "Analysis of biomass hydrothermal liquefaction and biocrude-oil upgrading for renewable jet fuel production: The impact of reaction conditions on production costs and GHG emissions performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1388-1398.
    3. Pedersen, T.H. & Jensen, C.U. & Sandström, L. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2017. "Full characterization of compounds obtained from fractional distillation and upgrading of a HTL biocrude," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 408-419.
    4. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pang, Yoong Xin & Sharmin, Nusrat & Wu, Tao & Pang, Cheng Heng, 2023. "An investigation on plant cell walls during biomass pyrolysis: A histochemical perspective on engineering applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    2. Komeil Kohansal & Kamaldeep Sharma & Saqib Sohail Toor & Eliana Lozano Sanchez & Joscha Zimmermann & Lasse Aistrup Rosendahl & Thomas Helmer Pedersen, 2021. "Bio-Crude Production Improvement during Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biopulp by Simultaneous Application of Alkali Catalysts and Aqueous Phase Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Ma, Jiao & Feng, Shuo & Shen, Xiaoqian & Zhang, Zhikun & Wang, Zhuozhi & Kong, Wenwen & Yuan, Peng & Shen, Boxiong & Mu, Lan, 2021. "Integration of the pelletization and combustion of biodried products derived from municipal organic wastes: The influences of compression temperature and pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Lozano, E.M. & Pedersen, T.H. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2020. "Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and carbon capture and storage for the production of advanced liquid biofuels with negative CO2 emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Lili Qian & Jun Ni & Zhiyang Xu & Bin Yu & Shuang Wang & Heng Gu & Dong Xiang, 2021. "Biocrude Production from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Chlorella : Thermodynamic Modelling and Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-9, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Lozano, E.M. & Pedersen, T.H. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2020. "Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and carbon capture and storage for the production of advanced liquid biofuels with negative CO2 emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Ankit Mathanker & Snehlata Das & Deepak Pudasainee & Monir Khan & Amit Kumar & Rajender Gupta, 2021. "A Review of Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biomass for Biofuels Production with a Special Focus on the Effect of Process Parameters, Co-Solvents, and Extraction Solvents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-60, August.
    4. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    5. Shahbeik, Hossein & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Guillemin, Gilles J. & Fallahi, Alireza & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Amiri, Hamid & Rehan, Mohammad & Raikwar, Deepak & Latine, , 2024. "Biomass to biofuels using hydrothermal liquefaction: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    6. Michela Costa & Maurizio La Villetta & Daniele Piazzullo & Domenico Cirillo, 2021. "A Phenomenological Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier Flexible to the Feedstock Composition and the Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Šuhaj, Patrik & Husár, Jakub & Haydary, Juma & Annus, Július, 2022. "Experimental verification of a pilot pyrolysis/split product gasification (PSPG) unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    8. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    9. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    11. Krogh, Andreas & Lozano, Eliana M. & Grue, Jeppe & Pedersen, Thomas H., 2024. "Assessment of feasible site locations for biofuel production based on technoeconomic modelling and GHG impact analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    12. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    13. Chamkalani, A. & Zendehboudi, S. & Rezaei, N. & Hawboldt, K., 2020. "A critical review on life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel: current challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Ramirez, Jerome A. & Brown, Richard & Rainey, Thomas J., 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of the thermal liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse in ethanol to produce liquid fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 184-193.
    15. Ahmad, Fiaz & Silva, Edson Luiz & Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amâncio, 2018. "Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-124.
    16. Perkins, Greg & Batalha, Nuno & Kumar, Adarsh & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2019. "Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Qian, Lili & Wang, Shuzhong & Savage, Phillip E., 2020. "Fast and isothermal hydrothermal liquefaction of sludge at different severities: Reaction products, pathways, and kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Castello, Daniele & Haider, Muhammad Salman & Rosendahl, Lasse Aistrup, 2019. "Catalytic upgrading of hydrothermal liquefaction biocrudes: Different challenges for different feedstocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 420-430.
    19. Karl, Jürgen & Pröll, Tobias, 2018. "Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 64-78.
    20. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2022. "Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.