IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v253y2019ic13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the catalytic mechanisms of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on unsupported and supported Ga-Ni clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Qingli
  • Ji, Wenchao
  • Russell, Christopher K.
  • Cheng, Zhiwen
  • Zhang, Yulong
  • Fan, Maohong
  • Shen, Zhemin

Abstract

Although experimental studies have shown that Ga3Ni5 is a promising catalyst for carbon dioxide (CO2) hydrogenation to methanol (CH3OH), the roles that cluster size and support play in the reaction are not clear. This research was set to study the quantitative and qualitative impacts of the size and support of Ga-Ni clusters on CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH at electronic and molecular levels by using density functional theory (DFT). Ga3Ni5, Ga6Ni10, Ga12Ni20, Ga15Ni25, and Ga24Ni40 nanoclusters, and γ-Al2O3- and SiO2- supported Ga6Ni10 were chosen as the study objects. Results show that adsorption energies of intermediates are highly related to intermediates’ characteristics and clusters’ active sites. Moreover, cluster size has no linear relation with the adsorption strengths of intermediates, while it has significant impact on the activation barrier of the rate-limiting step of hydrogenation process. Ga6Ni10 cluster has the lowest activation barrier of 1.04 eV due to the d-band center location and the exposed active sites of clusters. Compared with unsupported Ga6Ni10 clusters, Ga6Ni10/SiO2 and Ga6Ni10/γ-Al2O3 increase the adsorption energies of the intermediates and the activation barriers of the rate-limiting steps due to the lower electron transfer ability of Ga6Ni10 on SiO2 and γ-Al2O3 supports. Therefore, a support that can increase the electron transfer abilities of catalysts are preferable. The findings will be very beneficial for preparing new Ga-Ni catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Qingli & Ji, Wenchao & Russell, Christopher K. & Cheng, Zhiwen & Zhang, Yulong & Fan, Maohong & Shen, Zhemin, 2019. "Understanding the catalytic mechanisms of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on unsupported and supported Ga-Ni clusters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919312978
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    2. Kumar, Pawan & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2016. "Recent progress and innovation in carbon capture and storage using bioinspired materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 383-397.
    3. Jinyue Yan, 2018. "Negative-emissions hydrogen energy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 560-561, July.
    4. Stangeland, Kristian & Kalai, Dori Yosef & Li, Hailong & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "Active and stable Ni based catalysts and processes for biogas upgrading: The effect of temperature and initial methane concentration on CO2 methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 206-212.
    5. Al-Kalbani, Haitham & Xuan, Jin & García, Susana & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cui, Zhengxing & Wang, Yeqing & Zhang, Peipei & Lu, Song & Chen, Yuxuan & Yu, Xiaotao & Guo, Min & Liu, Tiancun & Ying, Jiadi & Shen, Qi & Jin, Yinying & Yu, Zhixin, 2024. "Stable Cuδ+ species - Catalyzed CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol in silanol nests on Cu/S-1 catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    2. Guo, Junyan & Gao, Ruihong & Tong, Zhaoming & Zhang, Haijun & Duan, Hongjuan & Huang, Liang & Lu, Lilin & Jia, Quanli & Zhang, Shaowei, 2023. "Three eagles with one arrow: Simultaneous production of hydrogen, aluminum ethoxide, and supported metal catalysts via efficient and facile reaction between aluminum and ethanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Chisalita, Dora Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Lim, Dongjun & Brigljević, Boris & Cho, Wonchul & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Kim, Chang-Hee & Lim, Hankwon, 2020. "Renewable methanol synthesis from renewable H2 and captured CO2: How can power-to-liquid technology be economically feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Cui, Zhengxing & Wang, Yeqing & Zhang, Peipei & Lu, Song & Chen, Yuxuan & Yu, Xiaotao & Guo, Min & Liu, Tiancun & Ying, Jiadi & Shen, Qi & Jin, Yinying & Yu, Zhixin, 2024. "Stable Cuδ+ species - Catalyzed CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol in silanol nests on Cu/S-1 catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    7. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Wang, Jianhui & Chen, Laijun & Mei, Shengwei & Yuan, Tiejiang, 2016. "Robust environmental-economic dispatch incorporating wind power generation and carbon capture plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 674-684.
    10. Abu Yousuf & Md Shahadat Hossain & Nishat Paul & Md Woashib Shikder & Deepak Kumar & Domenico Pirozzi & Ahmed Nazmus Sakib & Pejman Kazempoor, 2023. "Process Integration Approach to the Methanol (MeOH) Production Variability from Syngas and Industrial Waste Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    12. Bharath, G. & Karthikeyan, G. & Kumar, Anuj & Prakash, J. & Venkatasubbu, Devanand & Kumar Nadda, Ashok & Kumar Gupta, Vijai & Abu Haija, Mohammad & Banat, Fawzi, 2022. "Surface engineering of Au nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced electrochemical reduction of N2 and CO2 into urea in the visible-NIR region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    13. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Costa, Alexis & Coppitters, Diederik & Dubois, Lionel & Contino, Francesco & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2024. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    16. Xu, T.X. & Tian, X.K. & Khosa, A.A. & Yan, J. & Ye, Q. & Zhao, C.Y., 2021. "Reaction performance of CaCO3/CaO thermochemical energy storage with TiO2 dopant and experimental study in a fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Svitnič, Tibor & Sundmacher, Kai, 2022. "Renewable methanol production: Optimization-based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    18. Kang, Charles A. & Brandt, Adam R. & Durlofsky, Louis J. & Jayaweera, Indira, 2016. "Assessment of advanced solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture processes using a bi-objective optimization technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1209-1219.
    19. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Gustafsson, Marcus & Cordova, Stephanie S. & Svensson, Niclas & Eklund, Mats, 2024. "Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:253:y:2019:i:c:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.