IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v232y2018icp245-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game-theoretic approach to demand-side energy management for a smart neighbourhood in Sydney incorporating renewable resources

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandez, Edstan
  • Hossain, M.J.
  • Nizami, M.S.H.

Abstract

Recent developments in smart grid technologies have enabled interactions between energy suppliers and consumers, leading to profits made by both parties via Demand-side management (DSM). Demand-side management enables consumers to control their energy profile to reap economic benefits. It also helps energy providers to reduce the peak average ratio (PAR) by leveraging the flexibility of distributed energy resources (DERs) and renewable-energy resources (RESs) to supplement grid power, thereby avoiding the use of expensive peak-power plants. This paper presents an improved game-theoretic DSM framework for a neighbourhood area to provide cost savings for the consumer and reduce the PAR for the neighbourhood. The proposed DSM framework utilizes the flexibility of DERs and RESs to allow energy sharing among neighbours to reduce the demand peaks. A novel real-time price (RTP) retail tariff model has been established based on historical and predicted wholesale prices. A Nash-game-theory-based optimization model is developed for scheduling the building loads and DERs. The optimization model minimizes the energy cost to the consumer while maintaining an optimal comfort level for the consumer and satisfying consumption constraints to reduce peak demand. The proposed DSM framework and optimization model is verified via case studies with real building consumption data for a neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia. Game-theoretical analysis ensures that users do not make profits if they deviate from their assigned consumption pattern. The performance of various algorithms is evaluated and their effects on the peak average ratio (PAR) and energy costs are discussed. The effectiveness of the proposed game-theoretic optimization model is validated and compared with traditional non-game-theoretic models. The results of the proposed algorithm show reductions in the peak average ratio of the community and the cost incurred by the consumers. The PARs of the game-theoretic approach during summer and winter are 1.76 and 1.81 respectively. The cost reduction of the game-theoretic model is 9.17% during summer and 9.68% during winter compared to the non-cooperative approach. The numerical results represent the efficacy of the proposed DSM model in reducing the PAR of the community and the energy cost to the consumer.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandez, Edstan & Hossain, M.J. & Nizami, M.S.H., 2018. "Game-theoretic approach to demand-side energy management for a smart neighbourhood in Sydney incorporating renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 245-257.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:232:y:2018:i:c:p:245-257
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918314831
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Mengmeng & Hong, Seung Ho, 2017. "Incentive-based demand response considering hierarchical electricity market: A Stackelberg game approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 267-279.
    2. Radhakrishnan, Nikitha & Su, Yang & Su, Rong & Poolla, Kameshwar, 2016. "Token based scheduling for energy management in building HVAC systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 67-79.
    3. Siano, Pierluigi & Sarno, Debora, 2016. "Assessing the benefits of residential demand response in a real time distribution energy market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 533-551.
    4. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Akinola, O.A., 2017. "User satisfaction-induced demand side load management in residential buildings with user budget constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 352-366.
    5. Kristiansen, Martin & Korpås, Magnus & Svendsen, Harald G., 2018. "A generic framework for power system flexibility analysis using cooperative game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 223-232.
    6. Arteconi, Alessia & Ciarrocchi, Eleonora & Pan, Quanwen & Carducci, Francesco & Comodi, Gabriele & Polonara, Fabio & Wang, Ruzhu, 2017. "Thermal energy storage coupled with PV panels for demand side management of industrial building cooling loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1984-1993.
    7. Eissa, M.M., 2018. "First time real time incentive demand response program in smart grid with “i-Energy” management system with different resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 607-621.
    8. Sheikhi, Aras & Bahrami, Shahab & Ranjbar, Ali Mohammad, 2015. "An autonomous demand response program for electricity and natural gas networks in smart energy hubs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 490-499.
    9. Nolan, Sheila & O’Malley, Mark, 2015. "Challenges and barriers to demand response deployment and evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Bingtuan Gao & Wenhu Zhang & Yi Tang & Mingjin Hu & Mingcheng Zhu & Huiyu Zhan, 2014. "Game-Theoretic Energy Management for Residential Users with Dischargeable Plug-in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Connolly, David & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2017. "Smart energy and smart energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 556-565.
    12. Saffari, Mohammad & de Gracia, Alvaro & Fernández, Cèsar & Belusko, Martin & Boer, Dieter & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Optimized demand side management (DSM) of peak electricity demand by coupling low temperature thermal energy storage (TES) and solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 604-616.
    13. Goodman, John C, 1980. "Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 251-251, January.
    14. Finn, Paddy & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2014. "Demand side management of industrial electricity consumption: Promoting the use of renewable energy through real-time pricing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 11-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sajjad Ali & Imran Khan & Sadaqat Jan & Ghulam Hafeez, 2021. "An Optimization Based Power Usage Scheduling Strategy Using Photovoltaic-Battery System for Demand-Side Management in Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Nizami, M.S.H. & Haque, A.N.M.M. & Nguyen, P.H. & Hossain, M.J., 2019. "On the application of Home Energy Management Systems for power grid support," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Mbungu, Nsilulu T. & Bansal, Ramesh C. & Naidoo, Raj M. & Bettayeb, Maamar & Siti, Mukwanga W. & Bipath, Minnesh, 2020. "A dynamic energy management system using smart metering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Nizami, Sohrab & Tushar, Wayes & Hossain, M.J. & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan & Poor, H. Vincent, 2022. "Transactive energy for low voltage residential networks: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    5. Simona-Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra & George Adrian Ifrim, 2021. "Optimizing the Electricity Consumption with a High Degree of Flexibility Using a Dynamic Tariff and Stackelberg Game," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 151-182, July.
    6. Fahad R. Albogamy & Sajjad Ali Khan & Ghulam Hafeez & Sadia Murawwat & Sheraz Khan & Syed Irtaza Haider & Abdul Basit & Klaus-Dieter Thoben, 2022. "Real-Time Energy Management and Load Scheduling with Renewable Energy Integration in Smart Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    8. Luciana Marques & Wadaed Uturbey & Miguel Heleno, 2021. "An Integer Non-Cooperative Game Approach for the Transactive Control of Thermal Appliances in Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Nizami, M.S.H. & Hossain, M.J. & Amin, B.M. Ruhul & Fernandez, Edstan, 2020. "A residential energy management system with bi-level optimization-based bidding strategy for day-ahead bi-directional electricity trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Tian, Xiaoge & Chen, Weiming & Hu, Jinglu, 2023. "Game-theoretic modeling of power supply chain coordination under demand variation in China: A case study of Guangdong Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    11. Buonomano, Annamaria, 2020. "Building to Vehicle to Building concept: A comprehensive parametric and sensitivity analysis for decision making aims," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jianxiao & Zhong, Haiwang & Ma, Ziming & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2017. "Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 772-782.
    2. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    3. Wang, Jianxiao & Zhong, Haiwang & Lai, Xiaowen & Xia, Qing & Shu, Chang & Kang, Chongqing, 2017. "Distributed real-time demand response based on Lagrangian multiplier optimal selection approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 949-959.
    4. Pallonetto, Fabiano & De Rosa, Mattia & D’Ettorre, Francesco & Finn, Donal P., 2020. "On the assessment and control optimisation of demand response programs in residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Alibabaei, Nima & Fung, Alan S. & Raahemifar, Kaamran & Moghimi, Arash, 2017. "Effects of intelligent strategy planning models on residential HVAC system energy demand and cost during the heating and cooling seasons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 29-43.
    6. Sivaneasan, Balakrishnan & Kandasamy, Nandha Kumar & Lim, May Lin & Goh, Kwang Ping, 2018. "A new demand response algorithm for solar PV intermittency management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 36-45.
    7. Nguyen, Hai-Tra & Safder, Usman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Optimal demand side management scheduling-based bidirectional regulation of energy distribution network for multi-residential demand response with self-produced renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Tengfei Ma & Junyong Wu & Liangliang Hao & Huaguang Yan & Dezhi Li, 2018. "A Real-Time Pricing Scheme for Energy Management in Integrated Energy Systems: A Stackelberg Game Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Andre Leippi & Markus Fleschutz & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "A Review of EV Battery Utilization in Demand Response Considering Battery Degradation in Non-Residential Vehicle-to-Grid Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Luo, Zhe & Hong, SeungHo & Ding, YueMin, 2019. "A data mining-driven incentive-based demand response scheme for a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 549-559.
    11. Durillon, Benoit & Salomez, Florentin & Davigny, Arnaud & Kazmierczak, Sabine & Barry, Hervé & Saudemont, Christophe & Robyns, Benoît, 2021. "Consumers’ sensitivities and preferences modelling and integration in a decentralised two levels energy supervisor," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 142-157.
    12. Nezamoddini, Nasim & Wang, Yong, 2017. "Real-time electricity pricing for industrial customers: Survey and case studies in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1023-1037.
    13. Luerssen, Christoph & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Reindl, Thomas & Sekhar, Chandra & Cheong, David, 2020. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of PV-powered cooling systems with thermal energy and battery storage for off-grid applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Malik, Anam & Haghdadi, Navid & MacGill, Iain & Ravishankar, Jayashri, 2019. "Appliance level data analysis of summer demand reduction potential from residential air conditioner control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 776-785.
    15. Vanegas Cantarero, María Mercedes, 2018. "Reviewing the Nicaraguan transition to a renewable energy system: Why is “business-as-usual” no longer an option?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 580-592.
    16. Luerssen, Christoph & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Reindl, Thomas & Sekhar, Chandra & Cheong, David, 2019. "Levelised Cost of Storage (LCOS) for solar-PV-powered cooling in the tropics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 640-654.
    17. de Souza Dutra, Michael David & Alguacil, Natalia, 2020. "Optimal residential users coordination via demand response: An exact distributed framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. Hugo Algarvio & Fernando Lopes, 2023. "Bilateral Contracting and Price-Based Demand Response in Multi-Agent Electricity Markets: A Study on Time-of-Use Tariffs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Li, Xin & Chen, Hsing Hung & Tao, Xiangnan, 2016. "Pricing and capacity allocation in renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1097-1105.
    20. Jun Dong & Huijuan Huo & Dongran Liu & Rong Li, 2017. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Performance of Demand Response for Commercial Customers by Applying Combination Weighting Techniques and Fuzzy VIKOR Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-32, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:232:y:2018:i:c:p:245-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.