IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v226y2018icp1119-1133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A thermo-economic analysis and comparison of pumped-thermal and liquid-air electricity storage systems

Author

Listed:
  • Georgiou, Solomos
  • Shah, Nilay
  • Markides, Christos N.

Abstract

Efficient and affordable electricity storage systems have a significant potential to support the growth and increasing penetration of intermittent renewable-energy generation into the grid from an energy system planning and management perspective, while differences in the demand and price of peak and off-peak electricity can make its storage of economic interest. Technical (e.g., roundtrip efficiency, energy and power capacity) as well as economic (e.g., capital, operating and maintenance costs) indicators are anticipated to have a significant combined impact on the competitiveness of any electricity storage technology or system under consideration and, ultimately, will crucially determine their uptake and implementation. In this paper, we present thermo-economic models of two recently proposed medium- to large-scale electricity storage systems, namely ‘Pumped-Thermal Electricity Storage’ (PTES) and ‘Liquid-Air Energy Storage’ (LAES), focusing on system efficiency and costs. The LAES thermodynamic model is validated against data from an operational pilot plant in the UK; no such equivalent PTES plant exists, although one is currently under construction. As common with most newly proposed technologies, the absence of cost data results to the economic analysis and comparison being a significant challenge. Therefore, a costing effort for the two electricity storage systems that includes multiple costing approaches based on the module costing technique is presented, with the overriding aim of conducting a preliminary economic feasibility assessment and comparison of the two systems. Based on the results, it appears that PTES has the potential to achieve higher roundtrip efficiencies, although this remains to be demonstrated. LAES performance is found to be significantly enhanced through the integration and utilisation of waste heat (and cold) streams. In terms of economics on the other hand, and at the system size intended for commercial application, LAES (12 MW, 50MWh) is estimated in this work to have a lower capital cost and a lower levelised cost of storage than PTES (2 MW, 11.5 MWh), although it is noted that the prediction of the economic proposition of PTES technology is particularly uncertain if customised components are employed. However, when considering the required sell-to-buy price ratios, PTES appears (by a small margin) economically more competitive above an electricity buy price of ∼0.15 $/kWh, primarily due to its higher roundtrip efficiency. When considering the two systems at the same capacity, the costs are similar with a slight edge to PTES. Finally, it is of interest that the most expensive components in both systems are the compression and expansion devices, which suggests that there is a need to develop affordable high-performance devices for such systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgiou, Solomos & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2018. "A thermo-economic analysis and comparison of pumped-thermal and liquid-air electricity storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1119-1133.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1119-1133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918306627
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obi, Manasseh & Jensen, S.M. & Ferris, Jennifer B. & Bass, Robert B., 2017. "Calculation of levelized costs of electricity for various electrical energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 908-920.
    2. Freeman, James & Hellgardt, Klaus & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Working fluid selection and electrical performance optimisation of a domestic solar-ORC combined heat and power system for year-round operation in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 291-303.
    3. Freeman, James & Hellgardt, Klaus & Markides, Christos N., 2015. "An assessment of solar-powered organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heating and power in UK domestic applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 605-620.
    4. White, Alexander J., 2011. "Loss analysis of thermal reservoirs for electrical energy storage schemes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4150-4159.
    5. Benato, Alberto, 2017. "Performance and cost evaluation of an innovative Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 419-436.
    6. Sciacovelli, A. & Vecchi, A. & Ding, Y., 2017. "Liquid air energy storage (LAES) with packed bed cold thermal storage – From component to system level performance through dynamic modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 84-98.
    7. Guo, Juncheng & Cai, Ling & Chen, Jincan & Zhou, Yinghui, 2016. "Performance optimization and comparison of pumped thermal and pumped cryogenic electricity storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 260-269.
    8. Morgan, Robert & Nelmes, Stuart & Gibson, Emma & Brett, Gareth, 2015. "Liquid air energy storage – Analysis and first results from a pilot scale demonstration plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 845-853.
    9. McTigue, Joshua D. & White, Alexander J. & Markides, Christos N., 2015. "Parametric studies and optimisation of pumped thermal electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 800-811.
    10. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    11. Herrando, María & Markides, Christos N. & Hellgardt, Klaus, 2014. "A UK-based assessment of hybrid PV and solar-thermal systems for domestic heating and power: System performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 288-309.
    12. White, Alexander & McTigue, Joshua & Markides, Christos, 2014. "Wave propagation and thermodynamic losses in packed-bed thermal reservoirs for energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 648-657.
    13. Mariaud, Arthur & Acha, Salvador & Ekins-Daukes, Ned & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Integrated optimisation of photovoltaic and battery storage systems for UK commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 466-478.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yongliang & Song, Jian & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yao & Olympios, Andreas V. & Sapin, Paul & Yan, Junjie & Markides, Christos N., 2022. "Thermo-economic assessments of pumped-thermal electricity storage systems employing sensible heat storage materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 431-456.
    2. Liang, Ting & Vecchi, Andrea & Knobloch, Kai & Sciacovelli, Adriano & Engelbrecht, Kurt & Li, Yongliang & Ding, Yulong, 2022. "Key components for Carnot Battery: Technology review, technical barriers and selection criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Ameen, Muhammad Tahir & Ma, Zhiwei & Smallbone, Andrew & Norman, Rose & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2023. "Demonstration system of pumped heat energy storage (PHES) and its round-trip efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    4. McTigue, J.D. & White, A.J., 2018. "A comparison of radial-flow and axial-flow packed beds for thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 533-541.
    5. Frate, Guido Francesco & Ferrari, Lorenzo & Desideri, Umberto, 2021. "Energy storage for grid-scale applications: Technology review and economic feasibility analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1754-1772.
    6. Zhang, Han & Wang, Liang & Lin, Xipeng & Chen, Haisheng, 2020. "Combined cooling, heating, and power generation performance of pumped thermal electricity storage system based on Brayton cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Georgiou, Solomos & Aunedi, Marko & Strbac, Goran & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "On the value of liquid-air and pumped-thermal electricity storage systems in low-carbon electricity systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Guo, Juncheng & Cai, Ling & Chen, Jincan & Zhou, Yinghui, 2016. "Performance evaluation and parametric choice criteria of a Brayton pumped thermal electricity storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 693-701.
    9. Alberto Benato & Francesco De Vanna & Anna Stoppato, 2022. "Levelling the Photovoltaic Power Profile with the Integrated Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Albert, Max & Ma, Zhiwei & Bao, Huashan & Roskilly, Anthony Paul, 2022. "Operation and performance of Brayton Pumped Thermal Energy Storage with additional latent storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    11. Ge, Y.Q. & Zhao, Y. & Zhao, C.Y., 2021. "Transient simulation and thermodynamic analysis of pumped thermal electricity storage based on packed-bed latent heat/cold stores," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 939-951.
    12. Guo, Juncheng & Cai, Ling & Chen, Jincan & Zhou, Yinghui, 2016. "Performance optimization and comparison of pumped thermal and pumped cryogenic electricity storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 260-269.
    13. Zhang, Yanchao & Xie, Zhenzhen, 2022. "Thermodynamic efficiency and bounds of pumped thermal electricity storage under whole process ecological optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 711-720.
    14. Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna, 2018. "Heat transfer fluid and material selection for an innovative Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 155-168.
    15. Chakrabarti, Auyon & Proeglhoef, Rafael & Turu, Gonzalo Bustos & Lambert, Romain & Mariaud, Arthur & Acha, Salvador & Markides, Christos N. & Shah, Nilay, 2019. "Optimisation and analysis of system integration between electric vehicles and UK decentralised energy schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 805-815.
    16. Zhang, Han & Wang, Liang & Lin, Xipeng & Chen, Haisheng, 2023. "Parametric optimisation and thermo-economic analysis of Joule–Brayton cycle-based pumped thermal electricity storage system under various charging–discharging periods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    17. O'Callaghan, O. & Donnellan, P., 2021. "Liquid air energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Hüttermann, Lars & Span, Roland, 2019. "Influence of the heat capacity of the storage material on the efficiency of thermal regenerators in liquid air energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 236-245.
    19. Wang, Liang & Lin, Xipeng & Zhang, Han & Peng, Long & Ling, Haoshu & Zhang, Shuang & Chen, Haisheng, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of pumped thermal–liquid air energy storage (PTLAES)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    20. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1119-1133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.