IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v136y2014icp619-627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient Bayesian inversion of a geothermal prospect using a multivariate adaptive regression spline method

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Mingjie
  • Tompson, Andrew F.B.
  • Mellors, Robert J.
  • Ramirez, Abelardo L.
  • Dyer, Kathleen M.
  • Yang, Xianjin
  • Wagoner, Jeffrey L.

Abstract

In this study, an efficient Bayesian framework equipped with a multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) technique is developed to alleviate computational burdens encountered in a conventional Bayesian inversion of a geothermal prospect. Fast MARS models are developed from training dataset generated by CPU-intensive hydrothermal models and used as surrogate of high-fidelity physical models in Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. This Bayesian inference with MARS-enabled MCMC method is used to reduce prior estimates of uncertainty in structural or characteristic hydrothermal flow parameters of the model to posterior distributions. A geothermal prospect near Superstition Mountain in Imperial County of California in USA is used to illustrate the proposed framework and demonstrate the computational efficiency of MARS-based Bayesian inversion. The developed MARS models are also used to efficiently drive calculation of Sobol’ total sensitivity indices. Only top sensitive parameters are included in Bayesian inference to further improve the computational efficiency of inversion. Sensitivity analysis also confirms that water circulation through high permeable structures, rather than heat conduction through impermeable granite, is the primary heat transfer method. The presented framework is demonstrated an efficient tool to update knowledge of geothermal prospects by inversing field data. Although only thermal data is used in this study, other type of data, such as flow and transport observations, can be jointly used in this method for underground hydrocarbon reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Mingjie & Tompson, Andrew F.B. & Mellors, Robert J. & Ramirez, Abelardo L. & Dyer, Kathleen M. & Yang, Xianjin & Wagoner, Jeffrey L., 2014. "An efficient Bayesian inversion of a geothermal prospect using a multivariate adaptive regression spline method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 619-627.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:619-627
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914010113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Regis, Rommel G. & Shoemaker, Christine A., 2007. "Parallel radial basis function methods for the global optimization of expensive functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 514-535, October.
    2. Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yonghong & Fan, Qian & Zhang, Yunwei & Liu, Zengkai & Yu, Shilin & Ji, Renjie, 2014. "Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Rommel G. Regis & Christine A. Shoemaker, 2007. "A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Method for the Global Optimization of Expensive Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 497-509, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad, Tanveer & Chen, Huanxin, 2018. "Potential of three variant machine-learning models for forecasting district level medium-term and long-term energy demand in smart grid environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1008-1020.
    2. Anna Wachowicz-Pyzik & Anna Sowiżdżał & Leszek Pająk & Paweł Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2020. "Assessment of the Effective Variants Leading to Higher Efficiency for the Geothermal Doublet, Using Numerical Analysis‒Case Study from Poland (Szczecin Trough)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Athens, Noah D. & Caers, Jef K., 2019. "A Monte Carlo-based framework for assessing the value of information and development risk in geothermal exploration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Chen, Mingjie & Tompson, Andrew F.B. & Mellors, Robert J. & Abdalla, Osman, 2015. "An efficient optimization of well placement and control for a geothermal prospect under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 352-363.
    5. Chen, Siyuan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Hailong & Mclellan, Benjamin & Zhang, Tiantian & Tan, Zhizhou, 2019. "Investment decision on shallow geothermal heating & cooling based on compound options model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliane Müller, 2017. "SOCEMO: Surrogate Optimization of Computationally Expensive Multiobjective Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 581-596, November.
    2. Liu, Haoxiang & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "Locating multiple types of charging facilities for battery electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 30-55.
    3. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    4. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker, 2014. "Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 123-144, October.
    5. Juliane Müller & Joshua D. Woodbury, 2017. "GOSAC: global optimization with surrogate approximation of constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 117-136, September.
    6. Charles Audet & Edward Hallé-Hannan & Sébastien Le Digabel, 2023. "A General Mathematical Framework for Constrained Mixed-variable Blackbox Optimization Problems with Meta and Categorical Variables," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-37, March.
    7. Wu, Xin & Zheng, Yi & Wu, Bin & Tian, Yong & Han, Feng & Zheng, Chunmiao, 2016. "Optimizing conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater for irrigation to address human-nature water conflicts: A surrogate modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 380-392.
    8. Juliane Müller & Jangho Park & Reetik Sahu & Charuleka Varadharajan & Bhavna Arora & Boris Faybishenko & Deborah Agarwal, 2021. "Surrogate optimization of deep neural networks for groundwater predictions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 203-231, September.
    9. Dawei Zhan & Jiachang Qian & Yuansheng Cheng, 2017. "Pseudo expected improvement criterion for parallel EGO algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 641-662, July.
    10. M Laguna & J Molina & F Pérez & R Caballero & A G Hernández-Díaz, 2010. "The challenge of optimizing expensive black boxes: a scatter search/rough set theory approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 53-67, January.
    11. Tian, Qingyun & Wang, David Z.W. & Lin, Yun Hui, 2022. "Optimal deployment of autonomous buses into a transit service network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    12. Fani Boukouvala & M. M. Faruque Hasan & Christodoulos A. Floudas, 2017. "Global optimization of general constrained grey-box models: new method and its application to constrained PDEs for pressure swing adsorption," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 3-42, January.
    13. M. Joseane F. G. Macêdo & Elizabeth W. Karas & M. Fernanda P. Costa & Ana Maria A. C. Rocha, 2020. "Filter-based stochastic algorithm for global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 777-805, August.
    14. Andrea Cassioli & Fabio Schoen, 2013. "Global optimization of expensive black box problems with a known lower bound," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 177-190, September.
    15. Boukouvala, Fani & Misener, Ruth & Floudas, Christodoulos A., 2016. "Global optimization advances in Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming, MINLP, and Constrained Derivative-Free Optimization, CDFO," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 701-727.
    16. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker & Robert Piché, 2014. "SO-I: a surrogate model algorithm for expensive nonlinear integer programming problems including global optimization applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 865-889, August.
    17. Zhe Zhou & Fusheng Bai, 2018. "An adaptive framework for costly black-box global optimization based on radial basis function interpolation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 757-781, April.
    18. Taimoor Akhtar & Christine Shoemaker, 2016. "Multi objective optimization of computationally expensive multi-modal functions with RBF surrogates and multi-rule selection," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 17-32, January.
    19. Liu, Haoxiang & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2019. "Bike network design problem with a path-size logit-based equilibrium constraint: Formulation, global optimization, and matheuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 284-307.
    20. Richard T. Lyons & Richard C. Peralta & Partha Majumder, 2020. "Comparing Single-Objective Optimization Protocols for Calibrating the Birds Nest Aquifer Model—A Problem Having Multiple Local Optima," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:619-627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.