IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v136y2014icp495-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realistic wave conditions and their influence on quantifying the tidal stream energy resource

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis, M.J.
  • Neill, S.P.
  • Hashemi, M.R.
  • Reza, M.

Abstract

When selecting suitable sites for tidal stream energy arrays a wide range of factors must be considered, from the magnitude of the tidal stream resource, to realistic oceanographic conditions. Previous computational and laboratory-scale investigations into the impact of waves upon tidal turbines (such as turbine blade loadings) and turbine arrays (such as array configuration) typically assume that waves propagate “inline” to the tidal current (waves following or waves opposing the tidal current with a 20° tolerance limit). We investigated the wave climate at typical tidal stream energy sites across the British Isles. The wave climate was simulated at 18 sites using a 7-year (2005–2011) SWAN wave model simulation of the northwest European shelf seas. The principal semi-diurnal lunar constituent (M2) was also estimated at these sites using the three-dimensional ROMS tidal model. A significant proportion of the wave climate (between 49% and 93% of the time), including extreme wave events (>10m wave heights), was found to be propagating in a direction which was “oblique” to the major axis of tidal flow (i.e. waves which propagate at an angle to the tidal current with a 20° tolerance limit) at all 18 selected sites. Furthermore, the average “inline” wave climate was 2.25m less in height and 2s less in wave period in comparison to the oblique wave climate. To understand the direct effect of waves upon the tidal stream resource, the dynamically wave-tide coupled COAWST modelling system was applied to an idealized headland case study, which represented the typical tide and wave conditions expected at first generation tidal stream energy sites. Waves were found to alter the simulated tidal velocity profile, which, because tidal stream power is proportional to velocity cubed, reduced the theoretical resource by 10% for every metre increase in wave height (R2 94% with 22 degrees of freedom) – depending upon wave period and direction. Our research indicates that wave angle should be considered when quantifying the impact of waves upon tidal turbines, such as computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies, or laboratory-scale experiments of wake characteristics and turbine fatigue loading. Further, dynamically coupled tide-wave models may be necessary for a thorough resource assessment, since the complex wave-tide interaction affected the tidal resource; however, in situ observations of tidal velocity profiles during a range of wave events will be essential in validating such modelling approaches in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis, M.J. & Neill, S.P. & Hashemi, M.R. & Reza, M., 2014. "Realistic wave conditions and their influence on quantifying the tidal stream energy resource," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 495-508.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:495-508
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914010095
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholls-Lee, R.F. & Turnock, S.R. & Boyd, S.W., 2013. "Application of bend-twist coupled blades for horizontal axis tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 541-550.
    2. Batten, W.M.J. & Bahaj, A.S. & Molland, A.F. & Chaplin, J.R., 2008. "The prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of marine current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1085-1096.
    3. Val, Dimitri V. & Chernin, Leon & Yurchenko, Daniil V., 2014. "Reliability analysis of rotor blades of tidal stream turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 26-33.
    4. Keskin Citiroglu, H. & Okur, A., 2014. "An approach to wave energy converter applications in Eregli on the western Black Sea coast of Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 738-747.
    5. Robins, Peter E. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matt J., 2014. "Impact of tidal-stream arrays in relation to the natural variability of sedimentary processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 311-321.
    6. Sánchez, M. & Carballo, R. & Ramos, V. & Iglesias, G., 2014. "Tidal stream energy impact on the transient and residual flow in an estuary: A 3D analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 167-177.
    7. Mason-Jones, A. & O'Doherty, D.M. & Morris, C.E. & O'Doherty, T., 2013. "Influence of a velocity profile & support structure on tidal stream turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-30.
    8. Neill, Simon P. & Hashemi, M. Reza & Lewis, Matt J., 2014. "The role of tidal asymmetry in characterizing the tidal energy resource of Orkney," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 337-350.
    9. Bryden, Ian G. & Couch, Scott J., 2006. "ME1—marine energy extraction: tidal resource analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-139.
    10. Harrison, Gareth P. & Wallace, A. Robin, 2005. "Climate sensitivity of marine energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 1801-1817.
    11. O Rourke, Fergal & Boyle, Fergal & Reynolds, Anthony, 2010. "Tidal energy update 2009," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 398-409, February.
    12. Work, Paul A. & Haas, Kevin A. & Defne, Zafer & Gay, Thomas, 2013. "Tidal stream energy site assessment via three-dimensional model and measurements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 510-519.
    13. Neill, Simon P. & Hashemi, M. Reza, 2013. "Wave power variability over the northwest European shelf seas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 31-46.
    14. Luznik, Luksa & Flack, Karen A. & Lust, Ethan E. & Taylor, Katharin, 2013. "The effect of surface waves on the performance characteristics of a model tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 108-114.
    15. Barbariol, Francesco & Benetazzo, Alvise & Carniel, Sandro & Sclavo, Mauro, 2013. "Improving the assessment of wave energy resources by means of coupled wave-ocean numerical modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 462-471.
    16. Galloway, Pascal W. & Myers, Luke E. & Bahaj, AbuBakr S., 2014. "Quantifying wave and yaw effects on a scale tidal stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 297-307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lewis, M. & Neill, S.P. & Robins, P. & Hashemi, M.R. & Ward, S., 2017. "Characteristics of the velocity profile at tidal-stream energy sites," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 258-272.
    2. Hashemi, M. Reza & Neill, Simon P. & Robins, Peter E. & Davies, Alan G. & Lewis, Matt J., 2015. "Effect of waves on the tidal energy resource at a planned tidal stream array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 626-639.
    3. Lewis, M. & Neill, S.P. & Robins, P.E. & Hashemi, M.R., 2015. "Resource assessment for future generations of tidal-stream energy arrays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 403-415.
    4. Mujahid Badshah & Saeed Badshah & James VanZwieten & Sakhi Jan & Muhammad Amir & Suheel Abdullah Malik, 2019. "Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling of Loads Variation and Fatigue Life of a Full-Scale Tidal Turbine under the Effect of Velocity Profile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Neill, Simon P. & Vögler, Arne & Goward-Brown, Alice J. & Baston, Susana & Lewis, Matthew J. & Gillibrand, Philip A. & Waldman, Simon & Woolf, David K., 2017. "The wave and tidal resource of Scotland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 3-17.
    6. Neill, Simon P. & Hashemi, M. Reza & Lewis, Matt J., 2016. "Tidal energy leasing and tidal phasing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 580-587.
    7. Guillou, Nicolas & Chapalain, Georges & Neill, Simon P., 2016. "The influence of waves on the tidal kinetic energy resource at a tidal stream energy site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 402-415.
    8. Calandra, Gemma & Wang, Taiping & Miller, Calum & Yang, Zhaoqing & Polagye, Brian, 2023. "A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 168-184.
    9. Zarzuelo, Carmen & López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2018. "Impact of human interventions on tidal stream power: The case of Cádiz Bay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 88-104.
    10. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    11. Robins, Peter E. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matt J., 2014. "Impact of tidal-stream arrays in relation to the natural variability of sedimentary processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 311-321.
    12. de Jesus Henriques, Tiago A. & Hedges, Terry S. & Owen, Ieuan & Poole, Robert J., 2016. "The influence of blade pitch angle on the performance of a model horizontal axis tidal stream turbine operating under wave–current interaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 166-175.
    13. González-Gorbeña, Eduardo & Pacheco, André & Plomaritis, Theocharis A. & Ferreira, Óscar & Sequeira, Cláudia, 2018. "Estimating the optimum size of a tidal array at a multi-inlet system considering environmental and performance constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 292-311.
    14. Modali, Pranav K. & Vinod, Ashwin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2021. "Towards a better understanding of yawed turbine wake for efficient wake steering in tidal arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 482-494.
    15. Wang, Shu-qi & Cui, Jie & Ye, Ren-chuan & Chen, Zhong-fei & Zhang, Liang, 2019. "Study of the hydrodynamic performance prediction method for a horizontal-axis tidal current turbine with coupled rotation and surging motion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 313-325.
    16. Pacheco, A. & Ferreira, Ó., 2016. "Hydrodynamic changes imposed by tidal energy converters on extracting energy on a real case scenario," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 369-385.
    17. Ian Masters & Alison Williams & T. Nick Croft & Michael Togneri & Matt Edmunds & Enayatollah Zangiabadi & Iain Fairley & Harshinie Karunarathna, 2015. "A Comparison of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Tidal Stream Turbine Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Marco Piano & Peter E. Robins & Alan G. Davies & Simon P. Neill, 2018. "The Influence of Intra-Array Wake Dynamics on Depth-Averaged Kinetic Tidal Turbine Energy Extraction Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Chen, Long & Lam, Wei-Haur, 2015. "A review of survivability and remedial actions of tidal current turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 891-900.
    20. Vazquez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2016. "Grid parity in tidal stream energy projects: An assessment of financial, technological and economic LCOE input parameters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 89-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:495-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.