IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v119y2014icp314-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current hybrid-electric powertrain architectures: Applying empirical design data to life cycle assessment and whole-life cost analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hutchinson, Tim
  • Burgess, Stuart
  • Herrmann, Guido

Abstract

The recent introduction of hybrid-electric powertrain technology has disrupted the automotive industry, causing significant powertrain design divergence. As this radical powertrain innovation matures, will hybrid vehicles dominate the future automotive market and does this represent a positive shift in the environmental impact of the industry? The answer to this question is sought within this paper. It seeks to take advantage of the position that the industry has reached, replacing previous theoretical studies with the first extensive empirical models of life cycle emissions and whole-life costing. A comprehensive snapshot of today’s hybrid market is presented, with detailed descriptions of the various hybrid powertrain architectures. Design data has been gathered for 44 hybrid passenger cars currently available in the US. The empirical data is used to explore the relative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and whole-life costing of different hybrid powertrain architectures. Potential dominant designs are identified and their emissions are shown to be reduced. However, both the emissions and economic competitiveness of different hybrid powertrains are shown to vary significantly depending on how the vehicle is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Hutchinson, Tim & Burgess, Stuart & Herrmann, Guido, 2014. "Current hybrid-electric powertrain architectures: Applying empirical design data to life cycle assessment and whole-life cost analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-329.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:119:y:2014:i:c:p:314-329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914000282
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan D. MacPherson & Gregory A. Keoleian & Jarod C. Kelly, 2012. "Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Labeling for Plug‐In Hybrid Vehicles from a Life Cycle Perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(5), pages 761-773, October.
    2. N/A, 2004. "The World Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 187(1), pages 8-35, January.
    3. N/A, 2004. "The World Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 189(1), pages 8-36, July.
    4. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Bradley, Thomas H., 2013. "Total cost of ownership, payback, and consumer preference modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 488-506.
    5. N/A, 2004. "The World Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 188(1), pages 8-35, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marelli, Silvia & Capobianco, Massimo, 2011. "Steady and pulsating flow efficiency of a waste-gated turbocharger radial flow turbine for automotive application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 459-465.
    2. Commendatore, Pasquale & Kubin, Ingrid & Petraglia, Carmelo & Sushko, Iryna, 2014. "Regional integration, international liberalisation and the dynamics of industrial agglomeration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 265-287.
    3. Cipek, Mihael & Pavković, Danijel & Petrić, Joško, 2013. "A control-oriented simulation model of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 121-133.
    4. Claudio Rossi & Davide Pontara & Carlo Falcomer & Marco Bertoldi & Riccardo Mandrioli, 2021. "A Hybrid–Electric Driveline for Agricultural Tractors Based on an e-CVT Power-Split Transmission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Mar�a C. Latorre, 2012. "Industry restructuring in transition after the arrival of multinationals: a general equilibrium analysis with firm-type costs differences," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 441-463, June.
    6. Cordiner, Stefano & Galeotti, Matteo & Mulone, Vincenzo & Nobile, Matteo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2016. "Trip-based SOC management for a plugin hybrid electric vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 891-905.
    7. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    8. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    9. Green, Erin H. & Skerlos, Steven J. & Winebrake, James J., 2014. "Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 562-566.
    10. Dumortier, Jerome & Zhang, Fengxiu & Marron, John, 2017. "State and federal fuel taxes: The road ahead for U.S. infrastructure funding," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 39-49.
    11. Huseynov, Samir & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Does California’s LCFS Reduce CO2 Emissions?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274200, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Pannee Suanpang & Pitchaya Jamjuntr, 2024. "Optimal Electric Vehicle Battery Management Using Q-learning for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    13. Makena Coffman & Paul Bernstein & Sherilyn Wee, 2017. "Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93, January.
    14. Jakov Topić & Jure Soldo & Filip Maletić & Branimir Škugor & Joško Deur, 2020. "Virtual Simulation of Electric Bus Fleets for City Bus Transport Electrification Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Wee, Sherilyn & Coffman, Makena & Allen, Scott, 2020. "EV driver characteristics: Evidence from Hawaii," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 33-40.
    16. David Newbery & Goran Strbac, 2014. "What is the target battery cost at which Battery Electric Vehicles are socially cost competitive?," Working Papers EPRG 1420, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    17. Dumortier, Jerome & Siddiki, Saba & Carley, Sanya & Cisney, Joshua & Krause, Rachel & Lane, Bradley & Rupp, John & Graham, John, 2015. "Effects of Life Cycle Cost Information Disclosure on the Purchase Decision of Hybrid and Plug-In Vehicles," IU SPEA AgEcon Papers 198643, Indiana University, IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
    18. Dumortier, Jerome & Kent, Matthew W. & Payton, Seth B., 2016. "Plug-in vehicles and the future of road infrastructure funding in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 187-195.
    19. Noel, Lance & McCormack, Regina, 2014. "A cost benefit analysis of a V2G-capable electric school bus compared to a traditional diesel school bus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 246-255.
    20. Hewu Wang & Xiaobin Zhang & Lvwei Wu & Cong Hou & Huiming Gong & Qian Zhang & Minggao Ouyang, 2015. "Beijing passenger car travel survey: implications for alternative fuel vehicle deployment," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 817-835, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:119:y:2014:i:c:p:314-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.