IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v107y2013icp1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimization model for natural gas supply portfolios of a power generation company

Author

Listed:
  • Jirutitijaroen, Panida
  • Kim, Sujin
  • Kittithreerapronchai, Oran
  • Prina, José

Abstract

This paper considers a deregulated electricity market environment where a natural gas-fired generation company can engage in different types of contracts to manage its natural gas supply as well as trade on the electricity market. If the contracts are properly designed, they can protect the company from fluctuations in electricity price and demand, at some cost to the company’s expected profit. This reduction in profit can be mitigated by trading on the natural gas and electricity spot markets, but this trading activity may also sometimes result in losses. A stochastic programming model is formulated to capture the hedging decisions made by the company, as well as the interactions between the natural gas and electricity markets. The benefits offered by this approach for profit maximization in a variety of business scenarios, such as the case where the company can hold some amount of gas in storage are studied and presented. It is found that the stochastic model enables the company to optimize the electricity generation schedule and the natural gas consumption, including spot price transactions and gas storage management. Several managerial insights into the natural gas market, natural gas storage, and distribution profit are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Jirutitijaroen, Panida & Kim, Sujin & Kittithreerapronchai, Oran & Prina, José, 2013. "An optimization model for natural gas supply portfolios of a power generation company," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:107:y:2013:i:c:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913001281
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago Cerisola & Álvaro Baíllo & José M. Fernández-López & Andrés Ramos & Ralf Gollmer, 2009. "Stochastic Power Generation Unit Commitment in Electricity Markets: A Novel Formulation and a Comparison of Solution Methods," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 32-46, February.
    2. Albert Madansky, 1960. "Inequalities for Stochastic Linear Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 197-204, January.
    3. Bopp, A. E. & Kannan, V. R. & Palocsay, S. W. & Stevens, S. P., 1996. "An optimization model for planning natural gas purchases, transportation, storage and deliverability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 511-522, October.
    4. Jean-Michel Guldmann, 1983. "Supply, Storage, and Service Reliability Decisions by Gas Distribution Utilities: A Chance-Constrained Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(8), pages 884-906, August.
    5. Samer Takriti & Benedikt Krasenbrink & Lilian S.-Y. Wu, 2000. "Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 268-280, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei, Zhinong & Chen, Sheng & Sun, Guoqiang & Wang, Dan & Sun, Yonghui & Zang, Haixiang, 2016. "Probabilistic available transfer capability calculation considering static security constraints and uncertainties of electricity–gas integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 305-316.
    2. Messagie, Maarten & Mertens, Jan & Oliveira, Luis & Rangaraju, Surendraprabu & Sanfelix, Javier & Coosemans, Thierry & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Macharis, Cathy, 2014. "The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 469-476.
    3. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.
    4. Qiao, Zheng & Guo, Qinglai & Sun, Hongbin & Sheng, Tongtian, 2018. "Multi-time period optimized configuration and scheduling of gas storage in gas-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 924-934.
    5. Li, Guoqing & Zhang, Rufeng & Jiang, Tao & Chen, Houhe & Bai, Linquan & Li, Xiaojing, 2017. "Security-constrained bi-level economic dispatch model for integrated natural gas and electricity systems considering wind power and power-to-gas process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 696-704.
    6. Hernán Gómez-Villarreal & Miguel Carrión & Ruth Domínguez, 2019. "Optimal Management of Combined-Cycle Gas Units with Gas Storage under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    8. Wu, Jung-Hua & Huang, Yun-Hsun, 2014. "Electricity portfolio planning model incorporating renewable energy characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 278-287.
    9. Cui, Hantao & Li, Fangxing & Hu, Qinran & Bai, Linquan & Fang, Xin, 2016. "Day-ahead coordinated operation of utility-scale electricity and natural gas networks considering demand response based virtual power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 183-195.
    10. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2014. "Incorporating short-term operational plant constraints into assessments of future electricity generation portfolios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 144-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Multistage Stochastic Power Generation Scheduling Co-Optimizing Energy and Ancillary Services," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 352-369, January.
    2. Aouam, Tarik & Rardin, Ronald & Abrache, Jawad, 2010. "Robust strategies for natural gas procurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 151-158, August.
    3. Psarras, John, 2016. "Multicriteria decision support to evaluate potential long-term natural gas supply alternatives: The case of GreeceAuthor-Name: Androulaki, Stella," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 791-810.
    4. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.
    5. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    6. Douglas T. Gardner & J. Scott Rogers, 1999. "Planning Electric Power Systems Under Demand Uncertainty with Different Technology Lead Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1289-1306, October.
    7. Anthony Bopp, 2000. "Daily price adjustments in the U.S. market for natural gas," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 28(2), pages 254-265, June.
    8. Pongsakdi, Arkadej & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Siemanond, Kitipat & Bagajewicz, Miguel J., 2006. "Financial risk management in the planning of refinery operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 64-86, September.
    9. Lise, Wietze & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2008. "Future evolution of the liberalised European gas market: Simulation results with a dynamic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 989-1004.
    10. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Nicola Secomandi, 2010. "Optimal Commodity Trading with a Capacitated Storage Asset," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 449-467, March.
    12. Trine K. Boomsma, 2019. "Comments on: A comparative study of time aggregation techniques in relation to power capacity-expansion modeling," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 406-409, October.
    13. Guldmann, Jean-Michel & Wang, Fahui, 1999. "Optimizing the natural gas supply mix of local distribution utilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 598-612, February.
    14. Matt Thompson, 2013. "Optimal Economic Dispatch and Risk Management of Thermal Power Plants in Deregulated Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 791-809, August.
    15. Elise D. Miller-Hooks & Hani S. Mahmassani, 2000. "Least Expected Time Paths in Stochastic, Time-Varying Transportation Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 198-215, May.
    16. Kjetil Haugen & Stein Wallace, 2006. "Stochastic programming: Potential hazards when random variables reflect market interaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 119-127, February.
    17. Devine, Mel T. & Bertsch, Valentin, 2018. "Examining the benefits of load shedding strategies using a rolling-horizon stochastic mixed complementarity equilibrium model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 643-658.
    18. Aouam, Tarik & Muthuraman, Kumar & Rardin, Ronal L., 2016. "Robust optimization policy benchmarks and modeling errors in natural gas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 807-815.
    19. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. ARAVENA, Ignacio & PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony, 2016. "An Asynchronous Distributed Algorithm for solving Stochastic Unit Commitment," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2016038, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:107:y:2013:i:c:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.