IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v102y2013icp840-849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and analysing storage systems in agricultural biomass supply chain for cellulosic ethanol production

Author

Listed:
  • Ebadian, Mahmood
  • Sowlati, Taraneh
  • Sokhansanj, Shahab
  • Townley-Smith, Lawrence
  • Stumborg, Mark

Abstract

In this paper, a combined simulation/optimization model is developed to better understand and evaluate the impact of the storage systems on the costs incurred by each actor in the agricultural biomass supply chain including farmers, hauling contractors and the cellulosic ethanol plant. The optimization model prescribes the optimum number and location of farms and storages. It also determines the supply radius, the number of farms required to secure the annual supply of biomass and also the assignment of farms to storage locations. Given the specific design of the supply chain determined by the optimization model, the simulation model determines the number of required machines for each operation, their daily working schedule and utilization rates, along with the capacities of storages. To evaluate the impact of the storage systems on the delivered costs, three storage systems are molded and compared: roadside storage (RS) system and two satellite storage (SS) systems including SS with fixed hauling distance (SF) and SS with variable hauling distance (SV). In all storage systems, it is assumed the loading equipment is dedicated to storage locations. The obtained results from a real case study provide detailed cost figures for each storage system since the developed model analyses the supply chain on an hourly basis and considers time-dependence and stochasticity of the supply chain. Comparison of the storage systems shows SV would outperform SF and RS by reducing the total delivered cost by 8% and 6%, respectively. However, RS results in 10% and 8% decline in consumed energy and produced CO2 in logistics operations compared to SV and SF, respectively. Another finding is that the dedication of loading equipment to storage locations is an expensive option for agricultural biomass supply chain as loading operation is utilized 3%, 6% and 11% of its annual working hours in RS, SF and SV, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebadian, Mahmood & Sowlati, Taraneh & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Townley-Smith, Lawrence & Stumborg, Mark, 2013. "Modeling and analysing storage systems in agricultural biomass supply chain for cellulosic ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 840-849.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:102:y:2013:i:c:p:840-849
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912006368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rentizelas, Athanasios A. & Tolis, Athanasios J. & Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P., 2009. "Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 887-894, May.
    2. Altman, Ira J. & Sanders, Dwight R. & Boessen, Christian R., 2007. "Applying Transaction Cost Economics: A Note on Biomass Supply Chains," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 25(1), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cobuloglu, Halil I. & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra, 2015. "Food vs. biofuel: An optimization approach to the spatio-temporal analysis of land-use competition and environmental impacts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 418-434.
    2. Zhang, Fengli & Johnson, Dana M. & Wang, Jinjiang, 2016. "Integrating multimodal transport into forest-delivered biofuel supply chain design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 58-67.
    3. Xie, Fei & Huang, Yongxi, 2018. "A multistage stochastic programming model for a multi-period strategic expansion of biofuel supply chain under evolving uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 130-148.
    4. Zhixue Liu & Shukun Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2017. "Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design under Feedstock Seasonality and Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Golecha, Rajdeep & Gan, Jianbang, 2016. "Effects of corn stover year-to-year supply variability and market structure on biomass utilization and cost," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 34-44.
    6. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    7. Eising, Jan Willem & van Onna, Tom & Alkemade, Floortje, 2014. "Towards smart grids: Identifying the risks that arise from the integration of energy and transport supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 448-455.
    8. Babazadeh, Reza, 2017. "Optimal design and planning of biodiesel supply chain considering non-edible feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1089-1100.
    9. Mohamed Abdul Ghani, N. Muhammad Aslaam & Vogiatzis, Chrysafis & Szmerekovsky, Joseph, 2018. "Biomass feedstock supply chain network design with biomass conversion incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 39-49.
    10. De Laporte, Aaron V. & Weersink, Alfons J. & McKenney, Daniel W., 2016. "Effects of supply chain structure and biomass prices on bioenergy feedstock supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1053-1064.
    11. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Shafie, S.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2014. "Rice straw supply chain for electricity generation in Malaysia: Economical and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 299-308.
    13. Rendon-Sagardi, Miguel A. & Sanchez-Ramirez, Cuauhtemoc & Cortes-Robles, Guillermo & Alor-Hernandez, Giner & Cedillo-Campos, Miguel G., 2014. "Dynamic analysis of feasibility in ethanol supply chain for biofuel production in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 358-367.
    14. Yagub Alipouri & Mohammad Hassan Sebt & Abdollah Ardeshir & Mohammad Hossein Fazel Zarandi, 2020. "A mixed-integer linear programming model for solving fuzzy stochastic resource constrained project scheduling problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 197-217, March.
    15. Moncada, J.A. & Lukszo, Z. & Junginger, M. & Faaij, A. & Weijnen, M., 2017. "A conceptual framework for the analysis of the effect of institutions on biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 895-915.
    16. Wang, Yu & Ebadian, Mahmood & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Webb, Erin & Lau, Anthony, 2017. "Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 360-376.
    17. Baral, Nawa Raj & Quiroz-Arita, Carlos & Bradley, Thomas H., 2017. "Uncertainties in corn stover feedstock supply logistics cost and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions for butanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1343-1356.
    18. Zhang, Qi & Shi, Zhenzhen & Zhang, Pengfei & Li, Zhichao & Jaberi-Douraki, Majid, 2017. "Predictive temperature modeling and experimental investigation of ultrasonic vibration-assisted pelleting of wheat straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 511-528.
    19. Larson, James A. & Yu, T. Edward & English, Burton C. & Jensen, Kimberly L. & Gao, Yuan & Wang, Chenguang, 2015. "Effect of outdoor storage losses on feedstock inventory management and plant-gate cost for a switchgrass conversion facility in East Tennessee," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 803-814.
    20. Babazadeh, Reza & Razmi, Jafar & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rabbani, Masoud, 2017. "A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 258-277.
    21. Balaman, Şebnem Yılmaz & Selim, Hasan, 2014. "A network design model for biomass to energy supply chains with anaerobic digestion systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 289-304.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Liu & Da Teng & Yan Zhu & Xingde Wang & Hanyang Wang, 2023. "Optimization of Process Parameters for Pellet Production from Corn Stalk Rinds Using Box–Behnken Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Vasiliki Tzelepi & Myrto Zeneli & Dimitrios-Sotirios Kourkoumpas & Emmanouil Karampinis & Antonios Gypakis & Nikos Nikolopoulos & Panagiotis Grammelis, 2020. "Biomass Availability in Europe as an Alternative Fuel for Full Conversion of Lignite Power Plants: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Altman, Ira J. & Johnson, Thomas G. & Moon, Wanki, 2010. "Organizational Preferences and Producer Characteristics in Biomass Supply Chains," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 28(2), pages 1-12.
    4. Saidur, R. & Abdelaziz, E.A. & Demirbas, A. & Hossain, M.S. & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2262-2289, June.
    5. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    6. Granoszewski, Karol & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Langfristige Rohstoffsicherung in der Supply Chain Biogas: Status Quo und Potenziale vertraglicher Zusammenarbeit," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260820, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    7. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-35.
    8. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Deboni, Tamires Liza & Simioni, Flávio José & Brand, Martha Andreia & Costa, Valdeci José, 2019. "Models for estimating the price of forest biomass used as an energy source: A Brazilian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 382-391.
    10. Razm, Sobhan & Brahimi, Nadjib & Hammami, Ramzi & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2023. "A production planning model for biorefineries with biomass perishability and biofuel transformation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Espinoza Pérez, Andrea Teresa & Camargo, Mauricio & Narváez Rincón, Paulo César & Alfaro Marchant, Miguel, 2017. "Key challenges and requirements for sustainable and industrialized biorefinery supply chain design and management: A bibliographic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 350-359.
    12. Palander, Teijo & Haavikko, Hanna & Kärhä, Kalle, 2018. "Towards sustainable wood procurement in forest industry – The energy efficiency of larger and heavier vehicles in Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 100-118.
    13. Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Laínez-Aguirre, José Miguel & Arranz-Piera, Pol & Velo, Enrique & Puigjaner, Luis, 2012. "Design of regional and sustainable bio-based networks for electricity generation using a multi-objective MILP approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 79-95.
    14. Awais, Fawad & Flodén, Jonas & Svanberg, Martin, 2021. "Logistic characteristics and requirements of Swedish wood biofuel heating plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Chugh, Shikha & Yu, T. Edward & Jackson, Samuel & Larson, James & English, Burton & Cho, Seong-Hoon, 2015. "Exploring the Potential to Penetrate the Energy Markets for Tennessee-Produced Switchgrass," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196899, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Zhu, Tong & Curtis, John & Clancy, Matthew, 2023. "Modelling barriers to low-carbon technologies in energy system analysis: The example of renewable heat in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    17. Zhang, Xingping & Luo, Kaiyan & Tan, Qinliang, 2016. "A feedstock supply model integrating the official organization for China's biomass generation plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 276-290.
    18. Ghadge, Abhijeet & van der Werf, Sjoerd & Er Kara, Merve & Goswami, Mohit & Kumar, Pankaj & Bourlakis, Michael, 2020. "Modelling the impact of climate change risk on bioethanol supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Calvert, K. & Pearce, J.M. & Mabee, W.E., 2013. "Toward renewable energy geo-information infrastructures: Applications of GIScience and remote sensing that build institutional capacity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 416-429.
    20. Babazadeh, Reza & Razmi, Jafar & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rabbani, Masoud, 2017. "A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 258-277.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:102:y:2013:i:c:p:840-849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.