IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v310y2017icp182-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasoning human emotional responses from large-scale social and public media

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xianghua
  • Wang, Zhen
  • Gao, Chao
  • Shi, Lei

Abstract

The basic characteristics of extreme events are their infrequence and potential damages to the human–nature system. It is difficult for people to design comprehensive policies for dealing with such events due to time pressure and their limit knowledge about rare and uncertain sequential impacts. Recently, online media provides digital source of individual and public information to study collective human responses to extreme events, which can help us reduce the damages of an extreme event and improve the efficiency of disaster relief. More specifically, there are different emotional responses (e.g., anxiety and anger) to an event and its subevents during a whole event, which can be reflected in the contents of public news and social media to a certain degree. Therefore, an online computational method for extracting these contents can help us better understand human emotional states at different stages of an event, reveal underlying reasons, and improve the efficiency of event relief. Here, we first employ tweets and reports extracted from Twitter and ReliefWeb for text analysis on three distinct events. Then, we detect textual contents by sentiment lexicon to find out human emotional responses over time. Moreover, a clustering-based method is proposed to detect emotional responses to a certain episode during events based on the co-occurrences of words as used in tweets and/or articles. Taking Japanese earthquake in 2011, Haiti earthquake in 2010 and Swine influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in 2009 as case studies, we reveal the underlying reasons of distinct patterns of human emotional responses to the whole events and their episodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xianghua & Wang, Zhen & Gao, Chao & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Reasoning human emotional responses from large-scale social and public media," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 182-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:310:y:2017:i:c:p:182-193
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300317302151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach, 2012. "Use of microblogging for collective sense‐making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 34-47, January.
    2. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2011. "Sentiment in Twitter events," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(2), pages 406-418, February.
    3. Mike Thelwall & David Wilkinson & Sukhvinder Uppal, 2010. "Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 190-199, January.
    4. Mike Thelwall & Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou, 2011. "Sentiment in Twitter events," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(2), pages 406-418, February.
    5. Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach, 2012. "Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 34-47, January.
    6. David Chavalarias & Jean-Philippe Cointet, 2008. "Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping, methodology and case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(1), pages 37-50, April.
    7. Mike Thelwall & David Wilkinson & Sukhvinder Uppal, 2010. "Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 190-199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Bo & Liu, Xuan & Lan, Zhongzhou & Fu, Rongrong, 2018. "A novel method for reconstructing period with single input in NFSR," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 36-40.
    2. Zhao, Dawei & Wang, Lianhai & Xu, Shujiang & Liu, Guangqi & Han, Xiaohui & Li, Shudong, 2017. "Vital layer nodes of multiplex networks for immunization and attack," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 169-175.
    3. Liu, Jinzhuo & Li, Tong & Wang, Wei & Zhao, Na & Hang, Feilu, 2018. "Impact of strategy-neutral rewarding on the evolution of cooperative behavior," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 76-79.
    4. Li, Xianghua & Guo, Jingyi & Gao, Chao & Su, Zhen & Bao, Deng & Zhang, Zili, 2018. "Network-based transportation system analysis: A case study in a mountain city," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 256-265.
    5. Zhang, Yingchao & Ning, Hongyun & Wang, Juan & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Coveting the successful neighbor promotes the cooperation for the spatial public goods game on two-layered lattices," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 29-37.
    6. Li, Xianghua & Guo, Jingyi & Gao, Chao & Zhang, Leyan & Zhang, Zili, 2018. "A hybrid strategy for network immunization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 214-219.
    7. Soriano-Sánchez, A.G. & Posadas-Castillo, C., 2018. "Smart pattern to generate small–world networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 415-422.
    8. Chen, Chuan & Li, Lixiang & Peng, Haipeng & Kurths, Jürgen & Yang, Yixian, 2018. "Fixed-time synchronization of hybrid coupled networks with time-varying delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 49-56.
    9. Zheng, Mingwen & Wang, Zeming & Li, Lixiang & Peng, Haipeng & Xiao, Jinghua & Yang, Yixian & Zhang, Yanping & Feng, Cuicui, 2018. "Finite-time generalized projective lag synchronization criteria for neutral-type neural networks with delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 195-203.
    10. Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Guo, Hao & Chu, Chen & Yu, Dalei & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Historical payoff promotes cooperation in voluntary prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 145-149.
    11. Zhang, Jun & Hu, Bin & Huang, Yi Jie & Deng, Zheng Hong & Wu, Tao, 2020. "The evolution of cooperation affected by aspiration-driven updating rule in multi-games with voluntary participation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Chenchen Yang & Han Zhang & Xunhua Li & Zongyi He & Junli Li, 2023. "Analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics of major natural disasters in China from 2008 to 2021 based on mining news database," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 1881-1916, September.
    13. Su, Zhen & Liu, Fanzhen & Gao, Chao & Gao, Shupeng & Li, Xianghua, 2018. "Inferring infection rate based on observations in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 170-176.
    14. Shen, Dongqin & Cao, Shanshan, 2018. "An efficient immunization strategy based on transmission limit in weighted complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-7.
    15. Li, Hui-Jia & Bu, Zhan & Li, Yulong & Zhang, Zhongyuan & Chu, Yanchang & Li, Guijun & Cao, Jie, 2018. "Evolving the attribute flow for dynamical clustering in signed networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 20-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liwen Vaughan, 2016. "Uncovering information from social media hyperlinks: An investigation of twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1105-1120, May.
    2. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    3. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Karin Sim Smith & Richard McCreadie & Craig Macdonald & Iadh Ounis, 2018. "Regional Sentiment Bias in Social Media Reporting During Crises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1013-1025, October.
    5. Beatriz Barros & Ana Fernández-Zubieta & Raul Fidalgo-Merino & Francisco Triguero, 2018. "Scientific knowledge percolation process and social impact: A case study on the biotechnology and microbiology perceptions on Twitter," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(6), pages 804-814.
    6. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Thomas T. Hills & Eugenio Proto & Daniel Sgroi & Chanuki Illushka Seresinhe, 2019. "Historical analysis of national subjective wellbeing using millions of digitized books," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 1271-1275, December.
    8. Ping-Yu Hsu & Hong-Tsuen Lei & Shih-Hsiang Huang & Teng Hao Liao & Yao-Chung Lo & Chin-Chun Lo, 2019. "Effects of sentiment on recommendations in social network," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 253-262, June.
    9. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Abhinav Kumar & Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor, 2019. "Event classification and location prediction from tweets during disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 737-757, December.
    10. Neu, Dean & Saxton, Greg & Rahaman, Abu & Everett, Jeffery, 2019. "Twitter and social accountability: Reactions to the Panama Papers," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 38-53.
    11. Herbst, Chris M. & Desouza, Kevin C. & Alashri, Saud & Kandala, Srinivasa Srivatsav & Khullar, Mayank & Bajaj, Vikash, 2018. "What Do Parents Value in a Child Care Provider? Evidence from Yelp Consumer Reviews," IZA Discussion Papers 11741, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Zavala, Araceli & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2019. "Visual analytics for identifying product disruptions and effects via social media," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 544-559.
    13. Mohammad Masoud Rahimi & Elham Naghizade & Mark Stevenson & Stephan Winter, 2023. "SentiHawkes: a sentiment-aware Hawkes point process to model service quality of public transport using Twitter data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 343-376, June.
    14. Simone Pizzi & Sara Moggi & Fabio Caputo & Pierfelice Rosato, 2021. "Social media as stakeholder engagement tool: CSR communication failure in the oil and gas sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 849-859, March.
    15. Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Barnett, Julie & Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Sams, Steven, 2016. "Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-96.
    16. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 2017. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 101-119, March.
    17. F. Schweitzer & D. Garcia, 2010. "An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 77(4), pages 533-545, October.
    18. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2015. "Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 247-259.
    19. Heleen Brans & Bert Scholtens, 2020. "Under his thumb the effect of president Donald Trump’s Twitter messages on the US stock market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Oleg S. Nagornyy & Olessia Y. Koltsova, 2017. "Mining Media Topics Perceived as Social Problems by Online Audiences: Use of a Data Mining Approach in Sociology," HSE Working papers WP BRP 74/SOC/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:310:y:2017:i:c:p:182-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.