IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v253y2015icp318-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of separation of interaction and replacement neighborhoods on spatial reciprocity

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Shasha
  • Luo, Dang

Abstract

Elucidating the evolution of cooperation is one of the greatest challenges in both evolutionary biology and social science. However, vast majority of existing studies simply assume that the interaction neighborhood and replacement neighborhood are symmetric, irrespective of the size of both neighborhoods. In this paper, we consider the asymmetrical setup, namely, the separation of interaction neighborhood and replacement neighborhood, into the prisoner’s dilemma game. In detail, it is assumed that there exist two types of players: player A possessing Moore interaction neighborhood and von Neumann replacement neighborhood and player B having von Neumann interaction neighborhood and Moore replacement neighborhood. Importantly, the fraction of former player is τ (the latter is 1−τ), and this ration keeps constant during the whole process. By means of Monte Carlo simulations, it is unveiled that cooperation can be promoted to the highest level at middle τ, which is related to the formation of giant cluster. Moreover, we also inspect the impact of uncertainty on the phase diagrams and find that middle τ completely changes the evolution trend of low or middle value. It is thus suggested the separation of interaction and replacement neighborhoods may shed new light into the solution of social dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Shasha & Luo, Dang, 2015. "Impact of separation of interaction and replacement neighborhoods on spatial reciprocity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 318-323.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:253:y:2015:i:c:p:318-323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300314017597
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohei Miyaji & Jun Tanimoto & Zhen Wang & Aya Hagishima & Naoki Ikegaya, 2013. "Direct Reciprocity in Spatial Populations Enhances R-Reciprocity As Well As ST-Reciprocity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Shi, Dong-Mei & Yang, Han-Xin & Hu, Mao-Bin & Du, Wen-Bo & Wang, Bing-Hong & Cao, Xian-Bin, 2009. "Preferential selection promotes cooperation in a spatial public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(21), pages 4646-4650.
    3. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, April.
    4. Xia, Cheng-yi & Ma, Zhi-qin & Wang, Zhen & Wang, Juan, 2012. "Evaluating fitness by integrating the highest payoff within the neighborhood promotes cooperation in social dilemmas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(24), pages 6440-6447.
    5. Zhen Wang & Lin Wang & Zi-Yu Yin & Cheng-Yi Xia, 2012. "Inferring Reputation Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Changbing Tang & Zhen Wang & Xiang Li, 2014. "Moderate Intra-Group Bias Maximizes Cooperation on Interdependent Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, February.
    7. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    8. Tanimoto, Jun & Nakata, Makoto & Hagishima, Aya & Ikegaya, Naoki, 2012. "Spatially correlated heterogeneous aspirations to enhance network reciprocity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(3), pages 680-685.
    9. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zhang, Hai-Feng & Jin, Zhen & Wang, Zhen, 2014. "Cooperation and popularity in spatial games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 86-94.
    11. Wang, Zhen & Du, Wen-Bo & Cao, Xian-Bin & Zhang, Lian-Zhong, 2011. "Integrating neighborhoods in the evaluation of fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(7), pages 1234-1239.
    12. Shijun Wang & Máté S Szalay & Changshui Zhang & Peter Csermely, 2008. "Learning and Innovative Elements of Strategy Adoption Rules Expand Cooperative Network Topologies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Cheng-Yi Xia & Sandro Meloni & Yamir Moreno, 2012. "Effects Of Environment Knowledge On Agglomeration And Cooperation In Spatial Public Goods Games," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(supp0), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keizo Shigaki & Zhen Wang & Jun Tanimoto & Eriko Fukuda, 2013. "Effect of Initial Fraction of Cooperators on Cooperative Behavior in Evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Hu, Menglong & Wang, Juan & Kong, Lingcong & An, Kang & Bi, Tao & Guo, Baohong & Dong, Enzeng, 2015. "Incorporating the information from direct and indirect neighbors into fitness evaluation enhances the cooperation in the social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 47-52.
    3. Tian, Lin-Lin & Li, Ming-Chu & Lu, Kun & Zhao, Xiao-Wei & Wang, Zhen, 2013. "The influence of age-driven investment on cooperation in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 65-70.
    4. Wang, Zhen & Wu, Bin & Li, Ya-peng & Gao, Hang-xian & Li, Ming-chu, 2013. "Does coveting the performance of neighbors of thy neighbor enhance spatial reciprocity?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 28-34.
    5. Wang, Yi-Ling, 2013. "Asymmetric evaluation of fitness enhances spatial reciprocity in social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 76-81.
    6. Wang, Yi-Ling, 2013. "Learning ability driven by majority selection enhances spatial reciprocity in prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-100.
    7. Kokubo, Satoshi & Wang, Zhen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2015. "Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 552-568.
    8. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Learn good from bad: Effects of good and bad neighbors in spatial prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 351-358.
    9. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    10. Kohei Miyaji & Jun Tanimoto & Zhen Wang & Aya Hagishima & Naoki Ikegaya, 2013. "Direct Reciprocity in Spatial Populations Enhances R-Reciprocity As Well As ST-Reciprocity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    11. Cui, Guang-Hai & Li, Ming-Chu & Fan, Xin-Xin & Deonauth, Nakema & Wang, Zhen, 2014. "Optimism when winning and cautiousness when losing promote cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 181-189.
    12. Lu, Kun & Wu, Bin & Li, Ming-chu & Wang, Zhen, 2014. "Other-regarding preference causing ping-pong effect in self-questioning game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-58.
    13. Shen, Chen & Li, Xiaoping & Shi, Lei & Deng, Zhenghong, 2017. "Asymmetric evaluation promotes cooperation in network population," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 474(C), pages 391-397.
    14. Peng Lu & Xiaoping Zheng, 2015. "Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Chen, Zhi-Gang & Wang, Tao & Xiao, De-Gui & Xu, Yin, 2013. "Can remembering history from predecessor promote cooperation in the next generation?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 59-68.
    16. Jia, Danyang & Shen, Chen & Guo, Hao & Chu, Chen & Lu, Jun & Shi, Lei, 2018. "The impact of loners’ participation willingness on cooperation in voluntary prisoner's dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 218-223.
    17. Li, Hong-yang & Xiao, Jian & Li, Yu-meng & Wang, Zhen, 2013. "Effects of neighborhood type and size in spatial public goods game on diluted lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 145-153.
    18. Zhang, Shuhua & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wu, Yu’e & Yan, Ming & Li, Yu, 2019. "Strategy preference promotes cooperation in spatial evolutionary games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 181-188.
    19. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    20. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:253:y:2015:i:c:p:318-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.