IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v103y2022ics0361368222000368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recoupling work beyond COSO: A longitudinal case study of Enterprise-wide Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Jemaa, Fatma

Abstract

The present study examines how organizational designers of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) form an ensemble of structures, routines, and tools, consistent with the field-level ideal type. This longitudinal case study is theoretically informed by literature on decoupling and recoupling to account for these actors' efforts. The case studied demonstrates that recoupling actors draw on three modes of action—discursive, material, and relational—to address the two forms of decoupling identified by Bromley and Powell [2012. From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(6), 483–530]: policy–practice and means–ends. This study contributes to current research in three ways. First, it unpacks risk experts' efforts to address different forms of decoupling, reinvigorating debates on recoupling. Second, it shows that ideal-typical ERM is shaped by a succession of external templates. Third, it draws attention to the preeminent role of double-embedded actors who link successive templates to enable the formation of an organizational ERM that is consistent with the field-level ideal type. Together, these findings contrast with those of previous studies that argued that ERM working ensembles are inexorably inconsistent with the ideal type.

Suggested Citation

  • Jemaa, Fatma, 2022. "Recoupling work beyond COSO: A longitudinal case study of Enterprise-wide Risk Management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:103:y:2022:i:c:s0361368222000368
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2022.101369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368222000368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    2. Covaleski, Mark A. & Dirsmith, Mark W. & Michelman, Jeffrey E., 1993. "An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 65-80, January.
    3. Robert S. Kaplan & Anette Mikes, 2016. "Risk Management—the Revealing Hand," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-102, Harvard Business School.
    4. Tommaso Palermo & Michael Power & Simon Ashby, 2017. "Navigating Institutional Complexity: The Production of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 154-181, March.
    5. Kaufman, Matt & Covaleski, Mark A., 2019. "Budget formality and informality as a tool for organizing and governance amidst divergent institutional logics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 40-58.
    6. Marion Brivot & Darlene Himick & Daniel Martinez, 2017. "Constructing, Contesting, and Overloading: A Study of Risk Management Framing," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 703-728, October.
    7. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    8. Anette Mikes & Robert S. Kaplan, 2015. "When One Size Doesn't Fit All: Evolving Directions in the Research and Practice of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 27(1), pages 37-40, March.
    9. Anja Kern & Aziza Laguecir & Bernard Leca, 2017. "Behind Smoke and Mirrors: A Political Approach to Decoupling," Post-Print hal-01745307, HAL.
    10. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Azzone, Giovanni, 2010. "The organizational dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 659-675, October.
    11. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Palermo, Tommaso, 2017. "The dynamics of (dis)integrated risk management: a comparative field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    13. Elena Giovannoni & Sonia Quarchioni & Angelo Riccaboni, 2016. "The Role of Roles in Risk Management Change: The Case of an Italian Bank," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 109-129, May.
    14. Power, Michael, 2013. "The apparatus of fraud risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 525-543.
    15. Mikes, Anette, 2011. "From counting risk to making risk count: Boundary-work in risk management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 226-245.
    16. Jordan, Silvia & Mitterhofer, Hermann & Jørgensen, Lene, 2018. "The interdiscursive appeal of risk matrices: Collective symbols, flexibility normalism and the interplay of ‘risk’ and ‘uncertainty’," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 34-55.
    17. Covaleski, Mark A. & Dirsmith, Mark W., 1983. "Budgeting as a means for control and loose coupling," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 323-340, October.
    18. Eva Boxenbaum & Candace Jones & Renate E. Meyer & Silviya Svejenova, 2018. "Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies," Post-Print hal-01802981, HAL.
    19. Robert S. Kaplan & Anette Mikes, 2016. "Risk Management—the Revealing Hand," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 28(1), pages 8-18, March.
    20. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570310492335 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Themsen, Tim Neerup & Skærbæk, Peter, 2018. "The performativity of risk management frameworks and technologies: The translation of uncertainties into pure and impure risks," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 20-33.
    22. Laura F. Spira & Michael Page, 2003. "Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 640-661, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Beasley & Bruce Branson & Don Pagach, 2023. "An Evolving Risk Landscape: Insights from a Decade of Surveys of Executives and Risk Professionals," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Palermo, Tommaso, 2017. "The dynamics of (dis)integrated risk management: a comparative field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Andrea Kampmann & Burkhard Pedell, 2022. "Using Storytelling to Promote Organizational Resilience: An Experimental Study of Different Forms of Risk Communication," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 695-725, December.
    3. Shruti Kashyap & Einar Iveroth, 2021. "Transparency and accountability influences of regulation on risk control: the case of a Swedish bank," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 475-508, June.
    4. Crovini, Chiara & Ossola, Giovanni & Britzelmaier, Bernd, 2021. "How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An Advanced, Reasoned and Organised Literature Review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 118-134.
    5. Christiansen, Ulrik & Thrane, Sof, 2014. "The prose of action: The micro dynamics of reporting on emerging risks in operational risk management," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 427-443.
    6. Simon Ashby & Trevor Buck & Stephanie Nöth-Zahn & Thomas Peisl, 2018. "Emerging IT Risks: Insights from German Banking," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(2), pages 180-207, April.
    7. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Meidell, Anita & Kaarbøe, Katarina, 2017. "How the enterprise risk management function influences decision-making in the organization – A field study of a large, global oil and gas company," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 39-55.
    9. Posch, Arthur, 2020. "Integrating risk into control system design: The complementarity between risk-focused results controls and risk-focused information sharing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Gavin Cassar & Joseph Gerakos, 2017. "Do risk management practices work? Evidence from hedge funds," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1084-1121, September.
    11. Baud, Céline & Chiapello, Eve, 2017. "Understanding the disciplinary aspects of neoliberal regulations: The case of credit-risk regulation under the Basel Accords," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 3-23.
    12. Florio, Cristina & Leoni, Giulia, 2017. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 56-74.
    13. Vikash Kumar Sinha & Marika Arena, 2020. "Manifold Conceptions of the Internal Auditing of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 81-102, February.
    14. Jennifer Kunz & Mathias Heitz, 2021. "Banks’ risk culture and management control systems: A systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 439-493, December.
    15. Arnold, Vicky & Benford, Tanya & Canada, Joseph & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-16.
    16. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    17. Mónica Hernández-Madrigal & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Élfego Ramírez-Flores, 2020. "Are external pressures always behind ERM implementation? Evidence from Spanish listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 86-100, September.
    18. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    19. Lepori, Benedetto & Montauti, Martina, 2020. "Bringing the organization back in: Flexing structural responses to competing logics in budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Felice Matozza, 2014. "Risk management and firm size: a survey of Italian private companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 87-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:103:y:2022:i:c:s0361368222000368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.