IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i7p1039-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity of groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 concentrations and canopy structure

Author

Listed:
  • Ficklin, Darren L.
  • Luedeling, Eike
  • Zhang, Minghua

Abstract

Estimating groundwater recharge in response to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration and climate change is critical for future management of agricultural water resources in arid or semi-arid regions. Based on climate projections from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, this study quantified groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture in response to variations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations (550 and 970ppm) and average daily temperature (+1.1 and +6.4°C compared to current conditions). HYDRUS 1D, a model used to simulate water movement in unsaturated, partially saturated, or fully saturated porous media, was used to simulate the impact of climate change on vadose zone hydrologic processes and groundwater recharge for three typical crop sites (alfalfa, almonds and tomatoes) in the San Joaquin watershed in California. Plant growth with the consideration of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration was simulated using the heat unit theory. A modified version of the Penman-Monteith equation was used to account for the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Irrigation amount and timing was based on crop potential evapotranspiration. The results of this study suggest that increases in atmospheric CO2 and average daily temperature may have significant effects on groundwater recharge. Increasing temperature caused a temporal shift in plant growth patterns and redistributed evapotranspiration and irrigation water use earlier in the growing season resulting in a decrease in groundwater recharge under alfalfa and almonds and an increase under tomatoes. Elevating atmospheric CO2 concentrations generally decreased groundwater recharge for all crops due to decreased evapotranspiration resulting in decreased irrigation water use. Increasing average daily temperature by 1.1 and 6.4°C and atmospheric CO2 concentration to 550 and 970ppm led to a decrease in cumulative groundwater recharge for most scenarios. Overall, the results indicate that groundwater recharge may be very sensitive to potential future climate changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ficklin, Darren L. & Luedeling, Eike & Zhang, Minghua, 2010. "Sensitivity of groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 concentrations and canopy structure," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1039-1050, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:7:p:1039-1050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00072-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magoon, C. A. & Culpepper, Charles W., 1932. "Response of Sweet Corn to Varying Temperatures from Time of Planting to Canning Maturity," Technical Bulletins 163380, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Stockle, Claudio O. & Williams, Jimmy R. & Rosenberg, Norman J. & Jones, C. Allan, 1992. "A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: Part I--Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 225-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Danish Khan & Sonam Shakya & Hong Ha Thi Vu & Ji Whan Ahn & Gnu Nam, 2019. "Water Environment Policy and Climate Change: A Comparative Study of India and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Ramos, T.B. & Simionesei, L. & Jauch, E. & Almeida, C. & Neves, R., 2017. "Modelling soil water and maize growth dynamics influenced by shallow groundwater conditions in the Sorraia Valley region, Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 27-42.
    3. Roland Barthel & Tim Reichenau & Tatjana Krimly & Stephan Dabbert & Karl Schneider & Wolfram Mauser, 2012. "Integrated Modeling of Global Change Impacts on Agriculture and Groundwater Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(7), pages 1929-1951, May.
    4. Heejung Kim & Kang-Kun Lee, 2018. "A Comparison of the Water Environment Policy of Europe and South Korea in Response to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    5. Chen, Zongkui & Niu, Yuping & Zhao, Ruihai & Han, Chunli & Han, Huanyong & Luo, Honghai, 2019. "The combination of limited irrigation and high plant density optimizes canopy structure and improves the water use efficiency of cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 139-148.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcinkowski, Paweł & Piniewski, Mikołaj, 2024. "Future changes in crop yield over Poland driven by climate change, increasing atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen stress," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2019. "Computing the economic value of climate information for water stress management exemplified by crop production in Austria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 430-448.
    3. Cabelguenne, M. & Debaeke, P. & Bouniols, A., 1999. "EPICphase, a version of the EPIC model simulating the effects of water and nitrogen stress on biomass and yield, taking account of developmental stages: validation on maize, sunflower, sorghum, soybea," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 175-196, June.
    4. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2021. "Informing groundwater policies in semi-arid agricultural production regions under stochastic climate scenario impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Wolf, Joost & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Kros, Johannes & Webber, Heidi & Zhao, Gang & Britz, Wolfgang & Reinds, Gert Jan & Ewert, Frank & de Vries, Wim, 2015. "Combined analysis of climate, technological and price changes on future arable farming systems in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 56-73.
    6. Bocchiola, D. & Brunetti, L. & Soncini, A. & Polinelli, F. & Gianinetto, M., 2019. "Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in the Himalayas: A case study in Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 113-125.
    7. Wang, Zhiqiang & Ye, Li & Jiang, Jingyi & Fan, Yida & Zhang, Xiaoran, 2022. "Review of application of EPIC crop growth model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    8. Koffi M. Adji & Aklesso Y. G. Egbendewe & Boris O. K. Lokonon, 2022. "Potential impacts of sustainable agricultural practices on smallholders' behavior in developing countries: Evidence from Togo," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 73-87, February.
    9. Melkonian, J. & Riha, S. J. & Wilks, D. S., 1998. "Simulation of elevated CO2 effects on daily net canopy carbon assimilation and crop yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 87-106, September.
    10. Bhattarai, Mukesh Dev & Secchi, Silvia & Schoof, Justin, 2017. "Projecting corn and soybeans yields under climate change in a Corn Belt watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 90-99.
    11. Lee, Jeffrey J. & Phillips, Donald L. & Dodson, Rusty F., 1996. "Sensitivity of the US corn belt to climate change and elevated CO2: II. Soil erosion and organic carbon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 503-521, December.
    12. Wang, Zhaozhi & Zhang, T.Q. & Tan, C.S. & Taylor, R.A.J. & Wang, X. & Qi, Z.M. & Welacky, T., 2018. "Simulating crop yield, surface runoff, tile drainage and phosphorus loss in a clay loam soil of the Lake Erie region using EPIC," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 212-221.
    13. Juraj Balkovič & Erwin Schmid & Rastislav Skalský & Martina Nováková, 2011. "Modelling soil organic carbon changes on arable land under climate change - a case study analysis of the Kočín farm in Slovakia," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 30-42.
    14. Taras Lychuk & Roberto Izaurralde & Robert Hill & William McGill & Jimmy Williams, 2015. "Biochar as a global change adaptation: predicting biochar impacts on crop productivity and soil quality for a tropical soil with the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1437-1458, December.
    15. Qi, Zhi & Gao, Ya & Sun, Chen & Ramos, Tiago B. & Mu, Danning & Xun, Yihao & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu, 2024. "Assessing water-nitrogen use, crop growth and economic benefits for maize in upper Yellow River basin: Feasibility analysis for border and drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    16. Kang, Xiaoyu & Qi, Junyu & Li, Sheng & Meng, Fan-Rui, 2022. "A watershed-scale assessment of climate change impacts on crop yields in Atlantic Canada," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Lekarkar, Katoria & Nkwasa, Albert & Villani, Lorenzo & van Griensven, Ann, 2024. "Localizing agricultural impacts of 21st century climate pathways in data scarce catchments: A case study of the Nyando catchment, Kenya," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    18. Wang, Zhaozhi & Zhang, T.Q. & Tan, C.S. & Xue, Lulin & Bukovsky, Melissa & Qi, Z.M., 2021. "Modeling impacts of climate change on crop yield and phosphorus loss in a subsurface drained field of Lake Erie region, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Phillips, Donald L. & Lee, Jeffrey J. & Dodson, Rusty F., 1996. "Sensitivity of the US corn belt to climate change and elevated CO2: I. Corn and soybean yields," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 481-502, December.
    20. Bocchiola, D., 2015. "Impact of potential climate change on crop yield and water footprint of rice in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 223-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:7:p:1039-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.