IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i5p651-658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating participatory irrigation management in the Indian Himalayas

Author

Listed:
  • Saravanan, V.S.

Abstract

Participatory irrigation management (PIM) reforms are implemented in India to facilitate farmers' participation in irrigation management, through water user groups. Although thousands of user groups have been formed, a closer examination reveals inefficient water use, social power capture by rural elites in the name of participation, inadequate support from government institutions and government's inability to alleviate poverty. Currently, there is inadequate understanding of the linkage between socio-cultural, institutional and ecological factors affecting the outcome of the PIM reforms in India. Drawing from a case study village in the Shiwalik region of the Indian Himalayas, the paper identifies the role of diverse actors to exploit historic and ecological factors to derail the PIM reforms to frame water management problems. Using a combination of research methods and with application of a Bayesian network, the paper explores the inter-linkages between socio-cultural, institutional and ecological factors in derailing the PIM reforms. The paper reveals that PIM policies are never implemented, but integrated through the negotiation with other diverse policies and socio-cultural settings in (re)shaping water resources management. The analysis demonstrates that water is managed by multifaceted governance arrangements. In this governance arrangement state-centric or market-oriented or community-centered institutional arrangements are not superior to each other, rather they incrementally and cumulatively superimpose to (re)shape water resources management. In this process, integration represents a complex blend of statutory and socially embedded actors bringing with them diverse rules to negotiate, along with contextual factors. The findings call for laying out broad principles/ideologies in the policy statements of the statutory public actors that allow other actors to integrate, adapt and make policy processes dynamic. To facilitate this processes, the paper calls for statutory public actors to regulate water distribution, build capacity of actors and offer diverse forums for actors share and debate on the available information to take informed water-related decisions for a sustainable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Saravanan, V.S., 2010. "Negotiating participatory irrigation management in the Indian Himalayas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 651-658, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:5:p:651-658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(09)00357-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crawford, Sue E. S. & Ostrom, Elinor, 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 582-600, September.
    2. Batchelor, Charles & Cain, Jeremy, 1999. "Application of belief networks to water management studies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 51-57, March.
    3. Uusitalo, Laura, 2007. "Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 312-318.
    4. Barton, D.N. & Saloranta, T. & Moe, S.J. & Eggestad, H.O. & Kuikka, S., 2008. "Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management -- Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 91-104, May.
    5. Government of India GOI, 2008. "Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects," Working Papers id:1793, eSocialSciences.
    6. Marie Leigh Livingston, 1987. "Evaluating the Performance of Environmental Policy: Contributions of Neoclassical, Public Choice, and Institutional Models," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 281-294, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghosh, Souvik & Kolady, Deepthi Elizabeth & Das, Usha & Gorain, Subrato & Srivastava, Shivendra Kumar & Mondal, Bitan, 2019. "Spatio-temporal variations in effects of participatory irrigation management (PIM) reform in India: A panel data analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 48-61.
    2. Rahman, Muhammad Muhitur & Hagare, Dharma & Maheshwari, Basant, 2016. "Bayesian Belief Network analysis of soil salinity in a peri-urban agricultural field irrigated with recycled water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 280-296.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keshtkar, A.R. & Salajegheh, A. & Sadoddin, A. & Allan, M.G., 2013. "Application of Bayesian networks for sustainability assessment in catchment modeling and management (Case study: The Hablehrood river catchment)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 48-54.
    2. Moe, S. Jannicke & Haande, Sigrid & Couture, Raoul-Marie, 2016. "Climate change, cyanobacteria blooms and ecological status of lakes: A Bayesian network approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 330-347.
    3. Kragt, Marit Ellen & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2009. "Integrating economic values and catchment modelling," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 47956, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Kleemann, Janina & Celio, Enrico & Fürst, Christine, 2018. "Reprint of “Validation approaches of an expert-based Bayesian Belief Network in northern Ghana, West Africa”," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 101-118.
    5. Barton, David N. & Benjamin, Tamara & Cerdán, Carlos R. & DeClerck, Fabrice & Madsen, Anders L. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Salazar, Álvaro G. & Sanchez, Dalia & Villanueva, Cristóbal, 2016. "Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 165-174.
    6. Frimpong Boamah, Emmanuel, 2018. "Constitutional economics of Ghana’s decentralization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 256-267.
    7. David P Carter & Christopher M Weible & Saba N Siddiki & Xavier Basurto, 2016. "Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(1), pages 159-185, January.
    8. Di Zhang & Xinping Yan & Zaili Yang & Jin Wang, 2014. "An accident data–based approach for congestion risk assessment of inland waterways: A Yangtze River case," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 176-188, April.
    9. Saba Siddiki & Xavier Basurto & Christopher M. Weible, 2012. "Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 167-188, June.
    10. Adam Martin & Matias Petersen, 2019. "Poverty Alleviation as an Economic Problem," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(1), pages 205-221.
    11. Nicholson, Ann E. & Flores, M. Julia, 2011. "Combining state and transition models with dynamic Bayesian networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 555-566.
    12. Livingston, Marie Leigh & DEC, 1993. "Designing water institutions : market failures and institutional response," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1227, The World Bank.
    13. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    14. Michail Tsagris, 2021. "A New Scalable Bayesian Network Learning Algorithm with Applications to Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 341-367, January.
    15. De Iuliis, Melissa & Kammouh, Omar & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2021. "Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Fernando Filgueiras & Pedro Palotti & Graziella G. Testa, 2023. "Complexing Governance Styles: Connecting Politics and Policy in Governance Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    17. McVittie, Alistair & Norton, Lisa & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Siameti, Ioanna & Glenk, Klaus & Aalders, Inge, 2015. "Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-27.
    18. Michiel A. Heldeweg, 2017. "Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-34, July.
    19. Christopher Weible & David Carter, 2015. "The composition of policy change: comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 smoking bans," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(2), pages 207-231, June.
    20. Dunajevas Eugenijus & Skučienė Daiva, 2016. "Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 16-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:5:p:651-658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.