IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v299y2024ics0378377424002026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of optimum solum thickness of sloping cropland for maize plantation in an Entisol based on water use strategy and plant traits

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Lu
  • Luo, Yong
  • Tang, Jialiang
  • Zhang, Xifeng
  • Liu, Haowen
  • Cui, Junfang
  • Zheng, Jing
  • Dong, Xiaoming

Abstract

Shallow purple soils (Entisols) were widely distributed in hilly areas of southwest China and were easily subjected to drought due to the weak soil water retention capacity, which largely reduced the crop productivity. However, the impact of solum thickness on ecological traits and water use strategies of crops remain poorly understood under the shallow Entisol environment. In this study, water use patterns and physiological adaptation of maize with different solum thicknesses were investigated to ascertain the optimum solum thickness based on an in-situ experiment. Isotopic (2H and 18O) tracing technique was used to investigate the water sources for maize growth in sloping croplands with solum of 20 cm (C1), 40 cm (C2), 60 cm (C3), 80 cm (C4), 100 cm (C5) thickness. The morphological and physiological characteristics were also discussed under different soil moisture regimes. The results showed the soil water storage capacity significantly increased with solum thickness. The isotopes of xylem water in shallow solum (≦40 cm) were more enriched, indicating more contributions from the bottom soil water, especially under dry regimes (62.3% for C1, 42.8% for C2, at Jul. 09). The water sources utilized by maize in the treatments with solum thickness greater than 60 cm were relatively evenly distributed throughout the soil profile (mean 19.3%, 19.6% and 17.6%, respectively, in the 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–40 cm soil layer), and the water niche breadth increased with the solum thickness. Maize in shallow solum (≦40 cm) had lower biomass and higher specific leaf area (SLA) to reduce transpiration rate and improved water use efficiency (WUEi) (highest for C1, P<0.05, mean 14.8 μmol·mmol−1 under dry regimes), accompanying by lower photosynthetic rate, especially during the grain mature stage. The thicker solum (>60 cm) had significantly higher yields than in shallower solum (P<0.05), indicating that higher soil water storage in the thicker Entisol solum provided the most important base for cereal production. These findings suggested that maize on shallow croplands tended to use deep soil water and reduce water loss by restraining transpiration during drought conditions. However, the adaptation strategy through maintaining high SLA, low leaf area and height only ensured limited crop yields. Solum thickness is a critical index for affecting water use strategies and growth of maize, we recommended that greater than 60 cm is the optimum solum thickness for the maize plantation in the hilly croplands of the purple soil regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Lu & Luo, Yong & Tang, Jialiang & Zhang, Xifeng & Liu, Haowen & Cui, Junfang & Zheng, Jing & Dong, Xiaoming, 2024. "Determination of optimum solum thickness of sloping cropland for maize plantation in an Entisol based on water use strategy and plant traits," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas R. Patton & Kathleen A. Lohse & Sarah E. Godsey & Benjamin T. Crosby & Mark S. Seyfried, 2018. "Predicting soil thickness on soil mantled hillslopes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Hou, Chenli & Tian, Delong & Xu, Bing & Ren, Jie & Hao, Lei & Chen, Ning & Li, Xianyue, 2021. "Use of the stable oxygen isotope method to evaluate the difference in water consumption and utilization strategy between alfalfa and maize fields in an arid shallow groundwater area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Zhang, Yongyong & Wu, Shaoxiong & Kang, Wenrong & Tian, Zihan, 2022. "Multiple sources characteristics of root water uptake of crop under oasis farmlands in hyper-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Tao, Ze & Neil, Eric & Si, Bingcheng, 2021. "Determining deep root water uptake patterns with tree age in the Chinese loess area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Sun, Qing & Wang, Yaosheng & Chen, Geng & Yang, Hui & Du, Taisheng, 2018. "Water use efficiency was improved at leaf and yield levels of tomato plants by continuous irrigation using semipermeable membrane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 430-437.
    6. Song, Jianfeng & Guo, Yanan & Wu, Pute & Sun, SHikun, 2018. "The Agricultural Water Rebound Effect in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 497-506.
    7. Zhong, Honglin & Sun, Laixiang & Fischer, Günther & Tian, Zhan & van Velthuizen, Harrij & Liang, Zhuoran, 2017. "Mission Impossible? Maintaining regional grain production level and recovering local groundwater table by cropping system adaptation across the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Muniba Farhad & Maryam Noor & Muhammad Zubair Yasin & Mohsin Hussain Nizamani & Veysel Turan & Muhammad Iqbal, 2024. "Interactive Suitability of Rice Stubble Biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Improving Wastewater-Polluted Soil Health and Reducing Heavy Metals in Peas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Trevor F. Keenan & David Y. Hollinger & Gil Bohrer & Danilo Dragoni & J. William Munger & Hans Peter Schmid & Andrew D. Richardson, 2013. "Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise," Nature, Nature, vol. 499(7458), pages 324-327, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Yang, Xin & Bornø, Marie Louise & Wei, Zhenhua & Liu, Fulai, 2021. "Combined effect of partial root drying and elevated atmospheric CO2 on the physiology and fruit quality of two genotypes of tomato plants with contrasting endogenous ABA levels," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Guo, Weihua & Zhao, Peng & Chen, Xia & Xiao, Huan, 2015. "Ecosystem water use efficiency for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 24-33.
    4. Zhai, Yijie & Zhang, Tianzuo & Ma, Xiaotian & Shen, Xiaoxu & Ji, Changxing & Bai, Yueyang & Hong, Jinglan, 2021. "Life cycle water footprint analysis of crop production in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Louis Sears & Joseph Caparelli & Clouse Lee & Devon Pan & Gillian Strandberg & Linh Vuu & C. -Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell, 2018. "Jevons’ Paradox and Efficient Irrigation Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González & Donglan Zha, 2023. "The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Assessing the Water Rebound Effect in Chinese Agriculture," Working Papers 1415, Barcelona School of Economics.
    7. Ahmad Hamidov & Ulan Kasymov & Kakhramon Djumaboev & Carsten Paul, 2022. "Rebound Effects in Irrigated Agriculture in Uzbekistan: A Stakeholder-Based Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Hang Xu & Rui Yang & Jianfeng Song, 2021. "Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Rebound Effect: A Study for China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Yao Zhang & Pierre Gentine & Xiangzhong Luo & Xu Lian & Yanlan Liu & Sha Zhou & Anna M. Michalak & Wu Sun & Joshua B. Fisher & Shilong Piao & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Pereira, Luis S. & Bybordi, Mohammad, 2023. "Water management dilemma in the agricultural sector of Iran: A review focusing on water governance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Aijun Guo & Rong Zhang & Xiaoyu Song & Fanglei Zhong & Daiwei Jiang & Yuan Song, 2021. "Predicting the Water Rebound Effect in China under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Lin Fang & Fengping Wu & Yantuan Yu & Lin Zhang, 2020. "Irrigation technology and water rebound in China's agricultural sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1088-1100, October.
    13. Wen, Fenghua & Ye, Zhengke & Yang, Huaidong & Li, Ke, 2018. "Exploring the rebound effect from the perspective of household: An analysis of China's provincial level," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 345-356.
    14. Han, Hongyun & Zhou, Zinan, 2024. "The rebound effect of energy consumption and its determinants in China's agricultural production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    15. Fan, Yanli & Liu, Junmei & Zhao, Jiatao & Ma, Yuzhao & Li, Quanqi, 2019. "Effects of delayed irrigation during the jointing stage on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat under different planting patterns," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 371-376.
    16. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Wenge, 2022. "Water-use technical efficiency and income: Evidence from China's South-North Water Transfer Project," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Yu, Qihua & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Hu, Shunjun & Li, Yunfeng & Parsons, David, 2023. "Incorporating new functions into the WAVES model, to better simulate cotton production under film mulching and severe salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    18. Simioni, Guillaume & Marie, Guillaume & Davi, Hendrik & Martin-St Paul, Nicolas & Huc, Roland, 2020. "Natural forest dynamics have more influence than climate change on the net ecosystem production of a mixed Mediterranean forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    19. Xu, Hang & Song, Jianfeng, 2022. "Drivers of the irrigation water rebound effect: A case study of Hetao irrigation district in Yellow River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    20. Hans van Meijl & Petr Havlik & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Elke Stehfest & Peter Witzke & Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Benjamin Bodirsky & Michiel van Dijk & Jonathan Doelman & Thomas Fellmann & Florian Humpe, 2017. "Challenges of Global Agriculture in a Climate Change Context by 2050 (AgCLIM50)," JRC Research Reports JRC106835, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.