IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v290y2023ics0378377423004432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses of yield, fruit quality and water relations of sweet pepper in Mediterranean greenhouses to increasing salinity

Author

Listed:
  • Salinas, Jerónimo
  • Padilla, Francisco M.
  • Thompson, Rodney B.
  • Teresa Peña-Fleitas, M.
  • López-Martín, María
  • Gallardo, Marisa

Abstract

Increasing salinization of groundwater used for irrigation is a current and growing problem for vegetable production in greenhouses in the Mediterranean Basin. Vegetable growers in this system require clear information of crop response to salinity, particularly of threshold values. For sweet pepper in Mediterranean greenhouses, this work (i) evaluated the effect of increasing salinity on various parameters of crop yield, fruit quality and plant water relations, and (ii) determined threshold and slope values for the Maas and Hoffman (M&H) model. Sweet pepper was grown with nutrient solutions (ns) with electrical conductivities (EC) of 2.5 (T1), 3.5 (T2), 4.5 (T3), 5.5 (T4), 6.5 (T5) and 7.5 (T6) dS m−1. There were substantial and statistically significant reductions in total and marketable yield, dry matter production (DMP) and average fruit weight, with increasing salinity. In treatment T4 (ns of 5.5 dS m−1), the respective reductions for these parameters, compared to T1 (ns of 2.5 dS m−1), were 37%, 37%, 47%, 52% and 30%. Applying the M&H model, soil solution EC threshold (ECsst) values for total and marketable yield were 4.8 and 5.0 dS m−1. The respective slope values were − 8.0 and − 12.0%/dS m−1. The more rapid decline in marketable yield was influenced by a large increase in the incidence of blossom end rot (BER) with increasing salinity. In treatment T1, 25% of discarded fruit had BER which increased to 70% in T6. Average fruit size was affected by salinity, but fruit number was not. Most fruit quality parameters were unaffected by increasing salinity. However, fruits were more red and more yellow. Leaf water potential (ΨW), leaf osmotic potential (ΨO), stomatal conductance (gS) and leaf turgor potential (ΨP) followed the Maas and Hoffman model, with ΨW, ΨO and gS declining and ΨP increasing after the EC threshold value. The ECsst value for ΨW was 5.0 dS m−1, and for ΨO, gS and ΨP was 5.6–5.8 dS m−1. Considering all data, an ECsst value of 5.0 dS m−1 is suggested for sweet pepper grown in Mediterranean greenhouses.

Suggested Citation

  • Salinas, Jerónimo & Padilla, Francisco M. & Thompson, Rodney B. & Teresa Peña-Fleitas, M. & López-Martín, María & Gallardo, Marisa, 2023. "Responses of yield, fruit quality and water relations of sweet pepper in Mediterranean greenhouses to increasing salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:290:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423004432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423004432
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Letey, J. & Hoffman, G.J. & Hopmans, J.W. & Grattan, S.R. & Suarez, D. & Corwin, D.L. & Oster, J.D. & Wu, L. & Amrhein, C., 2011. "Evaluation of soil salinity leaching requirement guidelines," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 502-506, February.
    2. Ben-Gal, Alon & Ityel, Eviatar & Dudley, Lynn & Cohen, Shabtai & Yermiyahu, Uri & Presnov, Eugene & Zigmond, Leah & Shani, Uri, 2008. "Effect of irrigation water salinity on transpiration and on leaching requirements: A case study for bell peppers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 587-597, May.
    3. Thompson, R.B. & Martinez-Gaitan, C. & Gallardo, M. & Gimenez, C. & Fernandez, M.D., 2007. "Identification of irrigation and N management practices that contribute to nitrate leaching loss from an intensive vegetable production system by use of a comprehensive survey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 261-274, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    2. Minhas, P.S. & Ramos, Tiago B. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Pereira, Luis S., 2020. "Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Vinod Phogat & Tim Pitt & Paul Petrie & Jirka Šimůnek & Michael Cutting, 2023. "Optimization of Irrigation of Wine Grapes with Brackish Water for Managing Soil Salinization," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Yasuor, Hagai & Yermiyahu, Uri & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2020. "Consequences of irrigation and fertigation of vegetable crops with variable quality water: Israel as a case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Bonachela, Santiago & Fernández, María Dolores & Cabrera-Corral, Francisco Javier & Granados, María Rosa, 2022. "Salt and irrigation management of soil-grown Mediterranean greenhouse tomato crops drip-irrigated with moderately saline water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Skaggs, T.H. & Suarez, D.L. & Goldberg, S. & Shouse, P.J., 2012. "Replicated lysimeter measurements of tracer transport in clayey soils: Effects of irrigation water salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 84-93.
    7. Shin, Jong Hwa & Park, Jong Seok & Son, Jung Eek, 2014. "Estimating the actual transpiration rate with compensated levels of accumulated radiation for the efficient irrigation of soilless cultures of paprika plants," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 9-18.
    8. Peragón, Juan M. & Pérez-Latorre, Francisco J. & Delgado, Antonio & Tóth, Tibor, 2018. "Best management irrigation practices assessed by a GIS-based decision tool for reducing salinization risks in olive orchards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 33-41.
    9. Gallardo, M. & Giménez, C. & Martínez-Gaitán, C. & Stöckle, C.O. & Thompson, R.B. & Granados, M.R., 2011. "Evaluation of the VegSyst model with muskmelon to simulate crop growth, nitrogen uptake and evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 107-117.
    10. Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali & Henk Ritzema, 2018. "Integrating Irrigation and Drainage Management to Sustain Agriculture in Northern Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Merchán, D. & Casalí, J. & Del Valle de Lersundi, J. & Campo-Bescós, M.A. & Giménez, R. & Preciado, B. & Lafarga, A., 2018. "Runoff, nutrients, sediment and salt yields in an irrigated watershed in southern Navarre (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 120-132.
    12. Li, Shengping & Tan, Deshui & Wu, Xueping & Degré, Aurore & Long, Huaiyu & Zhang, Shuxiang & Lu, Jinjing & Gao, Lili & Zheng, Fengjun & Liu, Xiaotong & Liang, Guopeng, 2021. "Negative pressure irrigation increases vegetable water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency by improving soil water and NO3–-N distributions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    13. S. Li & Wan Luo & Z. Jia & S. Tang & C. Chen, 2018. "The Pros and Cons of Encouraging Shallow Groundwater Use through Controlled Drainage in a Salt-Impacted Irrigation Area," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2475-2487, May.
    14. Mar Carreras-Sempere & Rafaela Caceres & Marc Viñas & Carmen Biel, 2021. "Use of Recovered Struvite and Ammonium Nitrate in Fertigation in Tomato ( Lycopersicum esculentum ) Production for boosting Circular and Sustainable Horticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Haj-Amor, Zied & Kumar Acharjee, Tapos & Dhaouadi, Latifa & Bouri, Salem, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on irrigation water requirement of date palms under future salinity trend in coastal aquifer of Tunisian oasis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Libutti, Angela & Monteleone, Massimo, 2017. "Soil vs. groundwater: The quality dilemma. Managing nitrogen leaching and salinity control under irrigated agriculture in Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 40-50.
    17. Ityel, Eviatar & Ben-Gal, Alon & Silberbush, Moshe & Lazarovitch, Naftali, 2014. "Increased root zone oxygen by a capillary barrier is beneficial to bell pepper irrigated with brackish water in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-114.
    18. Che, Zheng & Wang, Jun & Li, Jiusheng, 2022. "Modeling strategies to balance salt leaching and nitrogen loss for drip irrigation with saline water in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    19. Lankford, Bruce A., 2023. "Resolving the paradoxes of irrigation efficiency: Irrigated systems accounting analyses depletion-based water conservation for reallocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    20. Bhantana, Parashuram & Lazarovitch, Naftali, 2010. "Evapotranspiration, crop coefficient and growth of two young pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties under salt stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 715-722, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:290:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423004432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.