IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v282y2023ics0378377423001397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Jie
  • Zhuo, La
  • Duan, Ximing
  • Wu, Pute

Abstract

The water footprint (WF) of crop production is a measure of the volumes of blue water (irrigation water) and green water (effective precipitation) consumed during crop growth. Setting the WF benchmarks of crop production in an irrigation district, exploring the optimal tillage practices, and clearly specifying blue and green water-saving potentials (WSPs) are essential for efficient utilization and reasonable allocation of agricultural water resources. However, related studies disregarded the WF benchmark setting according to tillage practices and the corresponding WSPs at the irrigation district scale. Meanwhile, the evaluation of WSP is limited to blue water. Considering summer maize and winter wheat grown in Baojixia Irrigation District (BID) of Shaanxi Province in China as the study case, this study aims to evaluate the gross irrigation WSP, actual blue and green WSPs based on crop WF simulation and WF benchmark setting for the “best” tillage practice. Eighteen water-saving tillage practice scenarios were set considering three irrigation techniques, three irrigation strategies, and two mulching practices. Results show that crop responses to different tillage practices differ. Maize WF has low sensitivity whereas wheat WF shows a significant difference following a change in irrigation techniques. In the practice under 40% deficit irrigation with no mulching, there is the highest actual WSPs, but at the cost of at least 57% reduction in crop yield. Whereas the practice of 20% deficit irrigation, furrow irrigation, and mulching has no yield reduction and relatively low WF, which can save 20% blue water and 8–12% green water in the BID, which is the optimal balance point between the yield and water consumption of the two crops. From the perspective of crop WF, this study quantified the agricultural WSPs of different water resources, and formulated a method for evaluating agricultural WSPs based on set WF benchmarks, to provide reference for building a water-saving culture, and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Jie & Zhuo, La & Duan, Ximing & Wu, Pute, 2023. "Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423001397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423001397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Jun & Cui, Yuanlai & Zhou, Sihang & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Regional water-saving potential calculation method for paddy rice based on remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Raeisi, Leila Goli & Morid, Saeed & Delavar, Majid & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2019. "Effect and side-effect assessment of different agricultural water saving measures in an integrated framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Wu, Di & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng, 2019. "Irrigation efficiency and water-saving potential considering reuse of return flow," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 519-527.
    4. Gao, Jie & Xie, Pengxuan & Zhuo, La & Shang, Kehui & Ji, Xiangxiang & Wu, Pute, 2021. "Water footprints of irrigated crop production and meteorological driving factors at multiple temporal scales," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    6. Pardo, J.J. & Martínez-Romero, A. & Léllis, B.C. & Tarjuelo, J.M. & Domínguez, A., 2020. "Effect of the optimized regulated deficit irrigation methodology on water use in barley under semiarid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Uygan, Demet & Cetin, Oner & Alveroglu, Volkan & Sofuoglu, Aytug, 2021. "Improvement of water saving and economic productivity based on quotation with sugar content of sugar beet using linear move sprinkler irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Nathaniel D. Mueller & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Deepak K. Ray & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management," Nature, Nature, vol. 490(7419), pages 254-257, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duan, Yiduo & Wang, Wei & Zhuo, La & Liu, Yilin & Wu, Pute, 2024. "Regional blue and green water-saving potential and regulation paths for crop production: A case study in the Yellow River Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Hui Gao & Tonggang Fu & Jianjia Zhu & Feng Wang & Mei Zhang & Fei Qi & Jintong Liu, 2023. "Supply and Demand Patterns Investigations of Water Supply Services Based on Ecosystem Service Flows in a Mountainous Area: Taihang Mountains Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Razmavaran, Mohammad Hadi & Sepaskhah, Ali Reza & Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid, 2024. "Water footprint and production of rain-fed saffron under different planting methods with ridge plastic mulch and pre-flowering irrigation in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Jun & Cui, Yuanlai & Zhou, Sihang & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Regional water-saving potential calculation method for paddy rice based on remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Cao, Juan & Zhang, Zhao & Tao, Fulu & Chen, Yi & Luo, Xiangzhong & Xie, Jun, 2023. "Forecasting global crop yields based on El Nino Southern Oscillation early signals," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Westhoek, Henk & Ingram, John & van Berkum, Siemen & Hajer, Maarten, 2015. "The European food system and natural resources: Impacts and Options," 148th Seminar, November 30-December 1, 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands 229279, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Giacomo Falchetta & Nicolò Stevanato & Magda Moner-Girona & Davide Mazzoni & Emanuela Colombo & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," Working Papers 2020.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Kathrin Stenchly & Marc Victor Hansen & Katharina Stein & Andreas Buerkert & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "Income Vulnerability of West African Farming Households to Losses in Pollination Services: A Case Study from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Bao-Li Miao & Ying Liu & Yu-Bing Fan & Xue-Jiao Niu & Xiu-Yun Jiang & Zeng Tang, 2023. "Optimization of Agricultural Resource Allocation among Crops: A Portfolio Model Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Singh, Kuntal & McClean, Colin J. & Büker, Patrick & Hartley, Sue E. & Hill, Jane K., 2017. "Mapping regional risks from climate change for rainfed rice cultivation in India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 76-84.
    8. Thomas M. Koutsos & Georgios C. Menexes & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2021. "The Use of Crop Yield Autocorrelation Data as a Sustainable Approach to Adjust Agronomic Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Xiaopei Tang & Haijun Liu & Li Yang & Lun Li & Jie Chang, 2022. "Energy Balance, Microclimate, and Crop Evapotranspiration of Winter Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under Sprinkler Irrigation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Mr. Emmanuel Momolu Pope & Prof. Wilson Opile & Dr. Lucas Ngode & Dr. Chepkoech Emmy, 2023. "Assessment of Upland Rice Production Constraints and Farmers’ Preferred Varieties in Liberia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 1307-1322, February.
    11. Samuthirapandi Subburaj & Thiyagarajan Thulasinathan & Viswabharathy Sakthivel & Bharathi Ayyenar & Rohit Kambale & Veera Ranjani Rajagopalan & Sudha Manickam & Raghu Rajasekaran & Gopalakrishnan Chel, 2024. "Genetic Enhancement of Blast and Bacterial Leaf Blight Resistance in Rice Variety CO 51 through Marker-Assisted Selection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, April.
    12. F. Jorge Bornemann & David P. Rowell & Barbara Evans & Dan J. Lapworth & Kamazima Lwiza & David M.J. Macdonald & John H. Marsham & Kindie Tesfaye & Matthew J. Ascott & Celia Way, 2019. "Future changes and uncertainty in decision-relevant measures of East African climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 365-384, October.
    13. Purola, Tuomo & Lehtonen, Heikki, 2020. "Evaluating profitability of soil-renovation investments under crop rotation constraints in Finland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Yibo Luan & Wenquan Zhu & Xuefeng Cui & Günther Fischer & Terence P. Dawson & Peijun Shi & Zhenke Zhang, 2019. "Cropland yield divergence over Africa and its implication for mitigating food insecurity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 707-734, June.
    15. Wang, Rong & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Gou, Jiachao & Wu, Zhangsheng, 2022. "Significant differences in agro-hydrological processes and water productivity between canal- and well-irrigated areas in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    16. Zhang, Cheng-Yao & Oki, Taikan, 2023. "Water pricing reform for sustainable water resources management in China’s agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    17. Zheng, Huifang & Mei, Peipei & Wang, Wending & Yin, Yulong & Li, Haojie & Zheng, Mengyao & Ou, Xingqi & Cui, Zhenling, 2023. "Effects of super absorbent polymer on crop yield, water productivity and soil properties: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Minghao Bai & Shenbei Zhou & Ting Tang, 2022. "A Reconstruction of Irrigated Cropland Extent in China from 2000 to 2019 Using the Synergy of Statistics and Satellite-Based Datasets," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Nina Repar & Pierrick Jan & Thomas Nemecek & Dunja Dux & Martina Alig Ceesay & Reiner Doluschitz, 2016. "Local versus Global Environmental Performance of Dairying and Their Link to Economic Performance: A Case Study of Swiss Mountain Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423001397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.