IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v241y2020ics0378377420305941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity of hydrology and water quality to variation in land use and land cover data

Author

Listed:
  • Risal, Avay
  • Parajuli, Prem B.
  • Dash, Padmanava
  • Ouyang, Ying
  • Linhoss, Anna

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) change is critical to hydrologic study as it affects surface runoff, sediment yield, and nutrient load from watersheds. Change in LULC is a continuous process in agricultural watersheds as per the growing and harvesting seasons. In this study, monthly LULC data layers were generated for the Big Sunflower River Watershed (BSRW), Mississippi by classifying cloud free Landsat images from 2014 to 2018 and combining them according to the season in order to obtain dominant LULC data layers for spring, summer, and fall. About 60 % of the total land area in summer was cultivated land, whereas only 20 and 5 % of the total land area were cultivated land during fall and spring, respectively. The rest of the total land area was constantly covered with urban, forest, and water for the three seasons. The overall accuracy and kappa coefficient ranging from of 87 % to 92 % and 0.8 to 0.90 was obtained during accuracy assessment of the seasonal LULC data layers. This suggested that the seasonal data layers can reasonably be used in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to analyze the effects of LULC data variation on hydrology and water quality of BSRW. SWAT was calibrated and validated for streamflow, sediment yield, and nutrient concentration using the summer LULC data layer and those parameters were applied to the models using the spring and fall LULC data layers. SWAT output for runoff, sediment yield, and nutrient load was found to be very sensitive to the change in LULC data layers. The average amount of runoff and sediment yield was higher during the summer while total nitrogen and total phosphorous yields were higher during the fall and spring, respectively. Agricultural operations are usually conducted during the summer and fields are mostly barren during the spring and fall. The use of seasonal LULC data layers is very beneficial to the scientific community as they can better explain the seasonal variation in hydrology and water quality as compared to the annual cropland data layer that is available for a single season of a year.

Suggested Citation

  • Risal, Avay & Parajuli, Prem B. & Dash, Padmanava & Ouyang, Ying & Linhoss, Anna, 2020. "Sensitivity of hydrology and water quality to variation in land use and land cover data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:241:y:2020:i:c:s0378377420305941
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420305941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dayakar Peddi & Kavi Kumar, 2019. "Farmer’s Perception on Soil Erosion in Rainfed Watershed Areas of Telangana, India," Working Papers 2019-180, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    2. Gassman, Philip W. & Reyes, Manuel R. & Green, Colleen H. & Arnold, Jeffrey G., 2007. "The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions," ISU General Staff Papers 200701010800001027, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Dakhlalla, Abdullah O. & Parajuli, Prem B. & Ouyang, Ying & Schmitz, Darrel W., 2016. "Evaluating the impacts of crop rotations on groundwater storage and recharge in an agricultural watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 332-343.
    4. Ni, Xiaojing & Parajuli, Prem B., 2018. "Evaluation of the impacts of BMPs and tailwater recovery system on surface and groundwater using satellite imagery and SWAT reservoir function," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 78-87.
    5. Parajuli, P.B. & Jayakody, P. & Sassenrath, G.F. & Ouyang, Y., 2016. "Assessing the impacts of climate change and tillage practices on stream flow, crop and sediment yields from the Mississippi River Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 112-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao Zhang & Xiaomin Chen & Wanshun Zhang & Hong Peng & Gaohong Xu & Yanxin Zhao & Zhenling Shen, 2022. "Impact of Land Use Changes on the Surface Runoff and Nutrient Load in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Francisco Javier Balbás & José Ramón Aranda & Cristina Rodríguez, 2024. "Installation and Management of Regulation Systems of a Hydroelectric Power Plant with Doubly Fed Induction Generator and Results of a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Tanushree Gupta & Rina Kumari, 2024. "Source apportionment of groundwater quality in agriculture-dominated semiarid region, India—using an integrated approach of hydrochemistry, stable isotopes and land use/land cover change," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26579-26605, October.
    4. Reza Jamshidi & Deirdre Dragovich, 2022. "Water Balance Uncertainty of a Hydrologic Model to Lengthy Drought and Storm Events in Managed Forest Catchments, Eastern Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Feng, Gary & Jin, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Huang, Yanbo, 2024. "The role of changing land use and irrigation scheduling in groundwater depletion mitigation in a humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    6. Wan, Wei & Han, Yiwen & Wu, Hanqing & Liu, Fan & Liu, Zhong, 2021. "Application of the source–sink landscape method in the evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution: First estimation of an orchard-dominated area in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojing Ni & Prem B. Parajuli & Ying Ouyang, 2020. "Assessing Agriculture Conservation Practice Impacts on Groundwater Levels at Watershed Scale," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1553-1566, March.
    2. Dipesh Nepal & Prem B. Parajuli, 2022. "Assessment of Best Management Practices on Hydrology and Sediment Yield at Watershed Scale in Mississippi Using SWAT," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Dipesh Nepal & Prem Parajuli & Ying Ouyang & Filip To & Nuwan Wijewardane & Vivek Venishetty, 2024. "Evaluation of Wetland Area Effects on Hydrology and Water Quality at Watershed Scale," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Prem B. Parajuli & Priyantha Jayakody & Ying Ouyang, 2018. "Evaluation of Using Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Data in SWAT," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 985-996, February.
    5. Ni, Xiaojing & Parajuli, Prem B., 2018. "Evaluation of the impacts of BMPs and tailwater recovery system on surface and groundwater using satellite imagery and SWAT reservoir function," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 78-87.
    6. Vivek Venishetty & Prem B. Parajuli, 2022. "Assessment of BMPs by Estimating Hydrologic and Water Quality Outputs Using SWAT in Yazoo River Watershed," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Olufemi Abimbola & Aaron Mittelstet & Tiffany Messer & Elaine Berry & Ann van Griensven, 2020. "Modeling and Prioritizing Interventions Using Pollution Hotspots for Reducing Nutrients, Atrazine and E. coli Concentrations in a Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Feng, Gary & Jin, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Huang, Yanbo, 2024. "The role of changing land use and irrigation scheduling in groundwater depletion mitigation in a humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    9. Avay Risal & Prem B. Parajuli, 2022. "Evaluation of the Impact of Best Management Practices on Streamflow, Sediment and Nutrient Yield at Field and Watershed Scales," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(3), pages 1093-1105, February.
    10. Meredith, Elizabeth & Blais, Nicole, 2019. "Quantifying irrigation recharge sources using groundwater modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 9-16.
    11. Egbendewe-Mondzozo, Aklesso & Swinton, Scott M. & Bals, Bryan D. & Dale, Bruce E., 2011. "Can Dispersed Biomass Processing Protect the Environment and Cover the Bottom Line for Biofuel?," Staff Paper Series 119348, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Andersson, Jafet C.M. & Zehnder, Alexander J.B. & Rockström, Johan & Yang, Hong, 2011. "Potential impacts of water harvesting and ecological sanitation on crop yield, evaporation and river flow regimes in the Thukela River basin, South Africa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1113-1124, May.
    13. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    14. Medwid, Laura J. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Clark, Christopher D. & Hawkins, Shawn A. & McClellan, Hannah A., 2016. "Estimating Soil Loss Abatement Curves with Primary Survey Data and Hydrologic Models: An Empirical Example for Livestock Production in an East Tennessee Watershed," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230052, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Catherine L. Kling & Raymond W. Arritt & Gray Calhoun & David A. Keiser, 2016. "Research Needs and Challenges in the FEW System: Coupling Economic Models with Agronomic, Hydrologic, and Bioenergy Models for Sustainable Food, Energy, and Water Systems," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 16-wp563, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. Alan F. Hamlet & Nima Ehsani & Jennifer L. Tank & Zachariah Silver & Kyuhyun Byun & Ursula H. Mahl & Shannon L. Speir & Matt T. Trentman & Todd V. Royer, 2024. "Effects of climate and winter cover crops on nutrient loss in agricultural watersheds in the midwestern U.S," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Negar Tayebzadeh Moghadam & Karim C. Abbaspour & Bahram Malekmohammadi & Mario Schirmer & Ahmad Reza Yavari, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Modelling of Water Balance Components in Response to Climate and Landuse Changes in a Heterogeneous Mountainous Catchment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 793-810, February.
    18. Yates, Andrew J. & Doyle, Martin W. & Rigby, J.R. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2013. "Market power, private information, and the optimal scale of pollution permit markets with application to North Carolina's Neuse River," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 256-276.
    19. Eini, Mohammad Reza & Salmani, Haniyeh & Piniewski, Mikołaj, 2023. "Comparison of process-based and statistical approaches for simulation and projections of rainfed crop yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Jeong, Hanseok & Kim, Hakkwan & Jang, Taeil & Park, Seungwoo, 2016. "Assessing the effects of indirect wastewater reuse on paddy irrigation in the Osan River watershed in Korea using the SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 393-402.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:241:y:2020:i:c:s0378377420305941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.