IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v221y2019icp175-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring irrigation water use over paddock scales using climate data and landsat observations

Author

Listed:
  • Bretreger, David
  • Yeo, In-Young
  • Quijano, Juan
  • Awad, John
  • Hancock, Greg
  • Willgoose, Garry

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture has been identified as using approximately 72% of water globally. Many regions of the world are subject to water sharing plans that cross government boarders which contain a mixture of management policies, leading to the requirement to monitor irrigation water use. The study reported here aims to develop and test an approach using Landsat observations to monitor irrigation water use over paddock scales without the need for in-situ observations, ground data or knowledge of planting dates. Using conservative assumptions about agricultural land management practice (i.e. negligible runoff, drainage and soil moisture change), the irrigation is calculated over 25 m x 25 m Landsat images. The approach uses a combination of three vegetation indices derived from Landsat images to calculate crop coefficients (Kc) based on multiple published relationships. These are combined through the FAO56 methodology using gridded rainfall and two gridded reference evapotranspiration (ETo) products to estimate actual evapotranspiration, providing six ETo - Kc combinations which are then compared to actual/recorded irrigation volumes from test sites. The method was tested over an almond farm, two vineyards and a cotton field; in addition to Goulburn-Murray Water’s (GMW) individual farm scale sites with unknown crops, all located within Australia. The developed approach provided estimated irrigation volumes that closely matched measured data for almond and cotton farms, while vineyards returned less accurate results due to localised management techniques that do not agree with land management assumptions made. The results from GMW showed some indication of the irrigation water use, although more details of the site being assessed needs to be available (i.e. crop type and extent). This study demonstrates the ability of certain remote sensing Kc relationships for sensing irrigation water use and shows the potential applications of the developed approach in monitoring irrigation over paddock scale environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bretreger, David & Yeo, In-Young & Quijano, Juan & Awad, John & Hancock, Greg & Willgoose, Garry, 2019. "Monitoring irrigation water use over paddock scales using climate data and landsat observations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 175-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:221:y:2019:i:c:p:175-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418316871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayanthi, Harikishan & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Wright, James L., 2007. "Development and validation of canopy reflectance-based crop coefficient for potato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 235-246, March.
    2. Gonzalez-Dugo, M.P. & Mateos, L., 2008. "Spectral vegetation indices for benchmarking water productivity of irrigated cotton and sugarbeet crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 48-58, January.
    3. Phogat, V. & Skewes, M.A. & McCarthy, M.G. & Cox, J.W. & Šimůnek, J. & Petrie, P.R., 2017. "Evaluation of crop coefficients, water productivity, and water balance components for wine grapes irrigated at different deficit levels by a sub-surface drip," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 22-34.
    4. R. Quentin Grafton & Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2018. "Economics of Water Recovery in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 487-510, October.
    5. Rupert Quentin Grafton, 2019. "Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(1), pages 116-141, January.
    6. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose, 2010. "Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 45-54, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Bretreger, David & Yeo, In-Young & Hancock, Greg, 2022. "Quantifying irrigation water use with remote sensing: Soil water deficit modelling with uncertain soil parameters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Rutger Willem Vervoort & Ignacio Fuentes & Joost Brombacher & Jelle Degen & Pedro Chambel-Leitão & Flávio Santos, 2022. "Progress in Developing Scale-Able Approaches to Field-Scale Water Accounting Based on Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Dimitrios Tassopoulos & Dionissios Kalivas & Rigas Giovos & Nestor Lougkos & Anastasia Priovolou, 2021. "Sentinel-2 Imagery Monitoring Vine Growth Related to Topography in a Protected Designation of Origin Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Rigas Giovos & Dimitrios Tassopoulos & Dionissios Kalivas & Nestor Lougkos & Anastasia Priovolou, 2021. "Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices in Viticulture: A Critical Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Consoli, S. & Vanella, D., 2014. "Mapping crop evapotranspiration by integrating vegetation indices into a soil water balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 71-81.
    3. Carpintero, E. & Mateos, L. & Andreu, A. & González-Dugo, M.P., 2020. "Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    4. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Suyker, Andrew E. & Arkebauer, Timothy J. & Gonçalves, Ivo Z., 2017. "Reflectance-based crop coefficients REDUX: For operational evapotranspiration estimates in the age of high producing hybrid varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 140-153.
    5. Garrido-Rubio, Jesús & González-Piqueras, Jose & Campos, Isidro & Osann, Anna & González-Gómez, Laura & Calera, Alfonso, 2020. "Remote sensing–based soil water balance for irrigation water accounting at plot and water user association management scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    6. Sánchez, Nilda & Martínez-Fernández, José & Calera, Alfonso & Torres, Enrique & Pérez-Gutiérrez, Carlos, 2010. "Combining remote sensing and in situ soil moisture data for the application and validation of a distributed water balance model (HIDROMORE)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 69-78, December.
    7. French, Andrew N. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Saber, Mazin & Gonzalez, Juan Roberto & Anderson, Ray, 2020. "Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Hunink, Johannes E. & Contreras, Sergio & Soto-García, Mariano & Martin-Gorriz, Bernardo & Martinez-Álvarez, Victoriano & Baille, Alain, 2015. "Estimating groundwater use patterns of perennial and seasonal crops in a Mediterranean irrigation scheme, using remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 47-56.
    9. Bispo, R.C. & Hernandez, F.B.T. & Gonçalves, I.Z. & Neale, C.M.U. & Teixeira, A.H.C., 2022. "Remote sensing based evapotranspiration modeling for sugarcane in Brazil using a hybrid approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    10. Campos, Isidro & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose & González-Dugo, Maria P. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso, 2016. "Combining a water balance model with evapotranspiration measurements to estimate total available soil water in irrigated and rainfed vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 141-152.
    11. Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2022. "Debunking Murray‐Darling Basin water trade myths," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 797-821, October.
    12. Colby, Bonnie, 2020. "Acquiring environmental flows: ecological economics of policy development in western U.S," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose, 2010. "Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 45-54, December.
    14. López-Urrea, R. & Sánchez, J.M. & de la Cruz, F. & González-Piqueras, J. & Chávez, J.L., 2020. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients from lysimeter measurements for sprinkler-irrigated canola," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Jin, Xiuliang & Yang, Guijun & Xue, Xuzhang & Xu, Xingang & Li, Zhenhai & Feng, Haikuan, 2017. "Validation of two Huanjing-1A/B satellite-based FAO-56 models for estimating winter wheat crop evapotranspiration during mid-season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 27-38.
    16. Zuo, Alec & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Xu, Ying, 2022. "Expanders, diversifiers or downsizers? Identifying clusters of irrigators’ water trade and farm management strategies in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Mateos, L. & González-Dugo, M.P. & Testi, L. & Villalobos, F.J., 2013. "Monitoring evapotranspiration of irrigated crops using crop coefficients derived from time series of satellite images. I. Method validation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 81-91.
    18. Zuo, Alec & Qiu, Feng & Wheeler, Sarah Ann, 2019. "Examining volatility dynamics, spillovers and government water recovery in Murray-Darling Basin water markets," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    19. Zinkernagel, Jana & Maestre-Valero, Jose. F. & Seresti, Sogol Y. & Intrigliolo, Diego S., 2020. "New technologies and practical approaches to improve irrigation management of open field vegetable crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    20. González-Dugo, M.P. & Escuin, S. & Cano, F. & Cifuentes, V. & Padilla, F.L.M. & Tirado, J.L. & Oyonarte, N. & Fernández, P. & Mateos, L., 2013. "Monitoring evapotranspiration of irrigated crops using crop coefficients derived from time series of satellite images. II. Application on basin scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 92-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:221:y:2019:i:c:p:175-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.