IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v210y2018icp185-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of irrigation return flow from a Triticale farm under sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems using experimental data: A case study in arid region

Author

Listed:
  • Naghedifar, Seyed Mohammadreza
  • Ziaei, Ali Naghi
  • Ansari, Hossein

Abstract

Irrigation return flow is an important and hard-to-estimate component of the groundwater balance equation. In this study, irrigation return flow from a Triticale farm under sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems was investigated in arid region. For the sake of accuracy, high-resolution (both temporally and spatially) datasets were provided through ten monitoring wells (eight two-meter-deep and two six-meter-deep monitoring wells) equipped with totally 76 soil moisture sensors. Moreover, dual crop coefficient approach was used for estimation of evapotranspiration in each experimental field due to its adaptability with short-interval data. The datasets were used for calibration and validation of HYDRUS-1D software over about six months of Triticale growth period. The results showed an acceptable agreement between measured and simulated water content in each soil layer of furrow- (with RMSE and MAE equal to 0.035 and 0.031 cm3/cm3, respectively) and sprinkler-irrigated (with RMSE and MAE equal to 0.024 and 0.020 cm3/cm3, respectively) fields. HYDRUS simulations were also used for estimation of irrigation return flow. Results showed that in furrow-irrigated field, about 13.3 percent of inflows (including irrigation and precipitation) returns back to groundwater aquifer as irrigation return flow. However, that was negligible in sprinkler-irrigated field. The rationale behind different irrigation flows obtained for each experimental field was investigated using water balance components obtained by HYDRUS software. It was revealed that total water application depth and evapotranspiration was almost the same for both experimental fields. However, the intrinsic difference between the application intervals and in turn, application depths in each interval provoked more irrigation return flow in furrow-irrigated field. Eventually, sensitivity assessment was done to quantify the impact of soil hydraulic parameters on return flow. The results showed that the parameters which have the most impact on total amount of return flow are θs and n for furrow-irrigated field whereas in the case of sprinkler-irrigated field parameters showed inconsiderable impact on return flow. The fact which has root in different initial water content of each experimental field.

Suggested Citation

  • Naghedifar, Seyed Mohammadreza & Ziaei, Ali Naghi & Ansari, Hossein, 2018. "Simulation of irrigation return flow from a Triticale farm under sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems using experimental data: A case study in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 185-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:210:y:2018:i:c:p:185-197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418311272
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, H.K. & Jang, T.I. & Im, S.J. & Park, S.W., 2009. "Estimation of irrigation return flow from paddy fields considering the soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 875-882, May.
    2. Siyal, A.A. & Skaggs, T.H., 2009. "Measured and simulated soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe sub-surface irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 893-904, June.
    3. Poch-Massegú, R. & Jiménez-Martínez, J. & Wallis, K.J. & Ramírez de Cartagena, F. & Candela, L., 2014. "Irrigation return flow and nitrate leaching under different crops and irrigation methods in Western Mediterranean weather conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Andarzian, B. & Bannayan, M. & Steduto, P. & Mazraeh, H. & Barati, M.E. & Barati, M.A. & Rahnama, A., 2011. "Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 1-8.
    5. Naik, B.S. & Panda, R.K. & Nayak, S.C. & Sharma, S.D., 2008. "Hydraulics and salinity profile of pitcher irrigation in saline water condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1129-1134, October.
    6. Kang, Mingoo & Park, Seungwoo, 2014. "Modeling water flows in a serial irrigation reservoir system considering irrigation return flows and reservoir operations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 131-141.
    7. Šimůnek, Jiří & Hopmans, Jan W., 2009. "Modeling compensated root water and nutrient uptake," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 505-521.
    8. Ziaei, A. N. & Sepaskhah, A. R., 2003. "Model for simulation of winter wheat yield under dryland and irrigated conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Danfeng, 2020. "Quantifying water use and groundwater recharge under flood irrigation in an arid oasis of northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yaohui & Wu, Pute & Gao, Xiaodong & Zhu, Delan & Zhang, Lin & Dai, Zhiguang & Chau, Henry Wai & Zhao, Xining, 2022. "Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters: Evaluating soil water effects under multiple precipitation scenarios," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Wen, Yeqiang & Shang, Songhao & Rahman, Khalil Ur & Xia, Yuhong & Ren, Dongyang, 2020. "A semi-distributed drainage model for monthly drainage water and salinity simulation in a large irrigation district in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Wu, Di & Cui, Yuanlai & Wang, Yitong & Chen, Manyu & Luo, Yufeng & Zhang, Lei, 2019. "Reuse of return flows and its scale effect in irrigation systems based on modified SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 280-288.
    4. Wei Zhu & Ruiquan Qiao & Rui Jiang, 2022. "Modelling of Water and Nitrogen Flow in a Rain-Fed Ridge-Furrow Maize System with Plastic Mulch," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Karandish, Fatemeh & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2017. "Two-dimensional modeling of nitrogen and water dynamics for various N-managed water-saving irrigation strategies using HYDRUS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 174-190.
    6. Hojjat Ghorbani Vaghei & Hossein Ali Bahrami & Farzin Nasiri Saleh, 2023. "Optimizing Soil Moisture in Subsurface Irrigation System Based on Porous Clay Capsule Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(8), pages 3037-3051, June.
    7. Shouse, Peter J. & Ayars, James E. & Simunek, Jirí, 2011. "Simulating root water uptake from a shallow saline groundwater resource," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 784-790, March.
    8. Phogat, V. & Skewes, M.A. & Cox, J.W. & Alam, J. & Grigson, G. & Šimůnek, J., 2013. "Evaluation of water movement and nitrate dynamics in a lysimeter planted with an orange tree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 74-84.
    9. Jang, T.I. & Kim, H.K. & Im, S.J. & Park, S.W., 2010. "Simulations of storm hydrographs in a mixed-landuse watershed using a modified TR-20 model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 201-207, February.
    10. Li, Yong & Šimůnek, Jirka & Zhang, Zhentin & Jing, Longfei & Ni, Lixiao, 2015. "Evaluation of nitrogen balance in a direct-seeded-rice field experiment using Hydrus-1D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 213-222.
    11. Ran, Hui & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Zhang, Xiaotao, 2018. "Parameterization of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated maize for seed production in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 438-450.
    12. Wang, Jianjun & Wang, Chuantao & Li, Hongchen & Liu, Yanfang & Li, Huijie & Ren, Ruiqi & Si, Bingcheng, 2023. "Rock water use by apple trees affected by physical properties of the underlying weathered rock," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    13. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    14. Mubarak, Ibrahim & Mailhol, Jean Claude & Angulo-Jaramillo, Rafael & Bouarfa, Sami & Ruelle, Pierre, 2009. "Effect of temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties on simulated water transfer under high-frequency drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1547-1559, November.
    15. Katerji, Nader & Campi, Pasquale & Mastrorilli, Marcello, 2013. "Productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of corn and tomato crops simulated by AquaCrop under contrasting water stress conditions in the Mediterranean region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 14-26.
    16. Zhang, Chao & Xie, Ziang & Wang, Qiaojuan & Tang, Min & Feng, Shaoyuan & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "AquaCrop modeling to explore optimal irrigation of winter wheat for improving grain yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    17. Noah James Langenfeld & Daniel Fernandez Pinto & James E. Faust & Royal Heins & Bruce Bugbee, 2022. "Principles of Nutrient and Water Management for Indoor Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Sonkar, Ickkshaanshu & Kotnoor, Hari Prasad & Sen, Sumit, 2019. "Estimation of root water uptake and soil hydraulic parameters from root zone soil moisture and deep percolation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 38-47.
    19. Zhang, Hongyuan & Batchelor, William D. & Hu, Kelin & Liang, Hao & Han, Hui & Li, Ji, 2022. "Simulation of N2O emissions from greenhouse vegetable production under different management systems in North China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    20. Zuluaga-Guerra, Paula Andrea & Martinez-Fernandez, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Angel & Dell'Angelo, Jampel, 2023. "A socio-ecological model of the Segura River basin, Spain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:210:y:2018:i:c:p:185-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.