IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v205y2018icp21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validating laboratory assessment of threshold electrolyte concentration for fields irrigated with marginal quality saline-sodic water

Author

Listed:
  • Dang, A.
  • Bennett, J. McL.
  • Marchuk, A.
  • Marchuk, S.
  • Biggs, A.J.W.
  • Raine, S.R.

Abstract

The use of marginal quality saline-sodic (MQSS) water for agricultural production is important in water limited environments and with a growing demand for food and fibre. Soil structural response to irrigation water quality is known to be a function of sodium contained in the irrigation water and the electrolyte concentration of that water. The threshold electrolyte concentration (CTH) is classically used to determine the suitability of water to be applied to a soil, and is usually conducted as a laboratory analysis utilising saturated hydraulic conductivity. This work aimed to validate the laboratory based semi-empirical disaggregation model approach to CTH against field soils where MQSS water had been applied for an extended period of time. Unirrigated locations proximal to long-term irrigation sites were paired to provide control conditions and the CTH was determined. Reduction in hydraulic conductivity from the control was determined as both observed and predicted data. Results supported validation of the approach, indicating the disaggregation model as useful for proactive planning of irrigation systems with regard to water quality and a good measure for identification of MQSS water as a strategic resource. Applicability of the results to irrigation guidelines was discussed with particular focus on removal of generalised guidelines and identification of what constitutes tolerable hydraulic conductivity reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Dang, A. & Bennett, J. McL. & Marchuk, A. & Marchuk, S. & Biggs, A.J.W. & Raine, S.R., 2018. "Validating laboratory assessment of threshold electrolyte concentration for fields irrigated with marginal quality saline-sodic water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 21-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418304967
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dang, A. & Bennett, J. McL. & Marchuk, A. & Biggs, A. & Raine, S.R., 2018. "Quantifying the aggregation-dispersion boundary condition in terms of saturated hydraulic conductivity reduction and the threshold electrolyte concentration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 172-178.
    2. Mallants, Dirk & Šimůnek, Jirka & Torkzaban, Saeed, 2017. "Determining water quality requirements of coal seam gas produced water for sustainable irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 52-69.
    3. Minhas, P. S., 1996. "Saline water management for irrigation in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Smith, C.J. & Oster, J.D. & Sposito, G., 2015. "Potassium and magnesium in irrigation water quality assessment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 59-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Echchelh, Alban & Hess, Tim & Sakrabani, Ruben, 2020. "Agro-environmental sustainability and financial cost of reusing gasfield-produced water for agricultural irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Qadir, M. & Sposito, G. & Smith, C.J. & Oster, J.D., 2021. "Reassessing irrigation water quality guidelines for sodicity hazard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Echchelh, Alban & Hess, Tim & Sakrabani, Ruben & Prigent, Stephane & Stefanakis, Alexandros I., 2021. "Towards agro-environmentally sustainable irrigation with treated produced water in hyper-arid environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedrero, Francisco & Grattan, S.R. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Vivaldi, Gaetano Alessandro, 2020. "Opportunities for expanding the use of wastewaters for irrigation of olives," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Singh, R.B. & Chauhan, C.P.S. & Minhas, P.S., 2009. "Water production functions of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) irrigated with saline and alkali waters using double-line source sprinkler system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 736-744, May.
    3. Afshin Ghahramani & John McLean Bennett & Aram Ali & Kathryn Reardon-Smith & Glenn Dale & Stirling D. Roberton & Steven Raine, 2021. "A Risk-Based Approach to Mine-Site Rehabilitation: Use of Bayesian Belief Network Modelling to Manage Dispersive Soil and Spoil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Minhas, P.S. & Dubey, S.K. & Sharma, D.R., 2007. "Comparative affects of blending, intera/inter-seasonal cyclic uses of alkali and good quality waters on soil properties and yields of paddy and wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 83-90, January.
    5. Qadir, M. & Boers, Th. M. & Schubert, S. & Ghafoor, A. & Murtaza, G., 2003. "Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: challenges and opportunities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 165-185, October.
    6. Minhas, P.S. & Qadir, Manzoor & Yadav, R.K., 2019. "Groundwater irrigation induced soil sodification and response options," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 74-85.
    7. Sharma, D. R. & Minhas, P. S., 2006. "Management options and policy guidelines for use of poor quality groundwater in agriculture," IWMI Books, Reports H039316, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Seidu, Razak & Drechsel, Pay, 2011. "Analyse cout-efficacite des interventions pour reduire les maladies diarrheiques chez les consommateurs de laitues irriguees avec des eaux usees au Ghana. In French," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    10. Domínguez, A. & Tarjuelo, J.M. & de Juan, J.A. & López-Mata, E. & Breidy, J. & Karam, F., 2011. "Deficit irrigation under water stress and salinity conditions: The MOPECO-Salt Model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(9), pages 1451-1461, July.
    11. Ramos, Tiago B. & Darouich, Hanaa & Šimůnek, Jiří & Gonçalves, Maria C. & Martins, José C., 2019. "Soil salinization in very high-density olive orchards grown in southern Portugal: Current risks and possible trends," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 265-281.
    12. Katerji, N. & Mastrorilli, M. & Lahmar, F., 2011. "FAO-56 methodology for the stress coefficient evaluation under saline environment conditions: Validation on potato and broad bean crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 588-596, February.
    13. Giulia Marino & Daniele Zaccaria & Richard L. Snyder & Octavio Lagos & Bruce D. Lampinen & Louise Ferguson & Stephen R. Grattan & Cayle Little & Kristen Shapiro & Mahesh Lal Maskey & Dennis L. Corwin , 2019. "Actual Evapotranspiration and Tree Performance of Mature Micro-Irrigated Pistachio Orchards Grown on Saline-Sodic Soils in the San Joaquin Valley of California," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Minhas, P.S. & Ramos, Tiago B. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Pereira, Luis S., 2020. "Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. M. L. Dotaniya & V. D. Meena & J. K. Saha & C. K. Dotaniya & Alaa El Din Mahmoud & B. L. Meena & M. D. Meena & R. C. Sanwal & Ram Swaroop Meena & R. K. Doutaniya & Praveen Solanki & Manju Lata & P. K., 2023. "Reuse of poor-quality water for sustainable crop production in the changing scenario of climate," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7345-7376, August.
    16. Echchelh, Alban & Hess, Tim & Sakrabani, Ruben & Prigent, Stephane & Stefanakis, Alexandros I., 2021. "Towards agro-environmentally sustainable irrigation with treated produced water in hyper-arid environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Courage D. Egbi & Geophrey Anornu & Emmanuel K. Appiah-Adjei & Samuel Y. Ganyaglo & Samuel B. Dampare, 2019. "Evaluation of water quality using hydrochemistry, stable isotopes, and water quality indices in the Lower Volta River Basin of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 3033-3063, December.
    18. Ewa Knapik & Grzegorz Rotko & Marta Marszałek, 2023. "Recovery of Lithium from Oilfield Brines—Current Achievements and Future Perspectives: A Mini Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Zhang, Junpeng & Li, Kejiang & Gao, Yang & Feng, Di & Zheng, Chunlian & Cao, Caiyun & Sun, Jingsheng & Dang, Hongkai & Hamani, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila, 2022. "Evaluation of saline water irrigation on cotton growth and yield using the AquaCrop crop simulation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Murad, Khandakar Faisal Ibn & Hossain, Akbar & Fakir, Oli Ahmed & Biswas, Sujit Kumar & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Rannu, Rahena Parvin & Timsina, Jagadish, 2018. "Conjunctive use of saline and fresh water increases the productivity of maize in saline coastal region of Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 262-270.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:205:y:2018:i:c:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.