IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v154y2017icp63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of process-based models for simulation of grain N in crop rotations across Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Xiaogang
  • Kersebaum, Kurt Christian
  • Kollas, Chris
  • Manevski, Kiril
  • Baby, Sanmohan
  • Beaudoin, Nicolas
  • Öztürk, Isik
  • Gaiser, Thomas
  • Wu, Lianhai
  • Hoffmann, Munir
  • Charfeddine, Monia
  • Conradt, Tobias
  • Constantin, Julie
  • Ewert, Frank
  • de Cortazar-Atauri, Iñaki Garcia
  • Giglio, Luisa
  • Hlavinka, Petr
  • Hoffmann, Holger
  • Launay, Marie
  • Louarn, Gaëtan
  • Manderscheid, Remy
  • Mary, Bruno
  • Mirschel, Wilfried
  • Nendel, Claas
  • Pacholski, Andreas
  • Palosuo, Taru
  • Ripoche-Wachter, Dominique
  • P. Rötter, Reimund
  • Ruget, Françoise
  • Sharif, Behzad
  • Trnka, Mirek
  • Ventrella, Domenico
  • Weigel, Hans-Joachim
  • E. Olesen, Jørgen

Abstract

The accurate estimation of crop grain nitrogen (N; N in grain yield) is crucial for optimizing agricultural N management, especially in crop rotations. In the present study, 12 process-based models were applied to simulate the grain N of i) seven crops in rotations, ii) across various pedo-climatic and agro-management conditions in Europe, iii) under both continuous simulation and single year simulation, and for iv) two calibration levels, namely minimal and detailed calibration. Generally, the results showed that the accuracy of the simulations in predicting grain N increased under detailed calibration. The models performed better in predicting the grain N of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) compared to spring oat (Avena sativa L.), winter rye (Secale cereale L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). These differences are linked to the intensity of parameterization with better parameterized crops showing lower prediction errors. The model performance was influenced by N fertilization and irrigation treatments, and a majority of the predictions were more accurate under low N and rainfed treatments. Moreover, the multi-model mean provided better predictions of grain N compared to any individual model. In regard to the Individual models, DAISY, FASSET, HERMES, MONICA and STICS are suitable for predicting grain N of the main crops in typical European crop rotations, which all performed well in both continuous simulation and single year simulation. Our results show that both the model initialization and the cover crop effects in crop rotations should be considered in order to achieve good performance of continuous simulation. Furthermore, the choice of either continuous simulation or single year simulation should be guided by the simulation objectives (e.g. grain yield, grain N content or N dynamics), the crop sequence (inclusion of legumes) and treatments (rate and type of N fertilizer) included in crop rotations and the model formalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Xiaogang & Kersebaum, Kurt Christian & Kollas, Chris & Manevski, Kiril & Baby, Sanmohan & Beaudoin, Nicolas & Öztürk, Isik & Gaiser, Thomas & Wu, Lianhai & Hoffmann, Munir & Charfeddine, Monia & , 2017. "Performance of process-based models for simulation of grain N in crop rotations across Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 63-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:154:y:2017:i:c:p:63-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16306394
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, L. & McGechan, M.B. & McRoberts, N. & Baddeley, J.A. & Watson, C.A., 2007. "SPACSYS: Integration of a 3D root architecture component to carbon, nitrogen and water cycling—Model description," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 343-359.
    2. Belder, P. & Bouman, B. A.M. & Spiertz, J.H.J., 2007. "Exploring options for water savings in lowland rice using a modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 91-114, January.
    3. Nendel, C. & Berg, M. & Kersebaum, K.C. & Mirschel, W. & Specka, X. & Wegehenkel, M. & Wenkel, K.O. & Wieland, R., 2011. "The MONICA model: Testing predictability for crop growth, soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(9), pages 1614-1625.
    4. Malone, R.W. & Kersebaum, K.C. & Kaspar, T.C. & Ma, L. & Jaynes, D.B. & Gillette, K., 2017. "Winter rye as a cover crop reduces nitrate loss to subsurface drainage as simulated by HERMES," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 156-169.
    5. Heidmann, T. & Tofteng, C. & Abrahamsen, P. & Plauborg, F. & Hansen, S. & Battilani, A. & Coutinho, J. & Doležal, F. & Mazurczyk, W. & Ruiz, J.D.R. & Takáč, J. & Vacek, J., 2008. "Calibration procedure for a potato crop growth model using information from across Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 209-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing, Qi & McConkey, Brian & Qian, Budong & Smith, Ward & Grant, Brian & Shang, Jiali & Liu, Jiangui & Bindraban, Prem & Luce, Mervin St., 2021. "Assessing water management effects on spring wheat yield in the Canadian Prairies using DSSAT wheat models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Baum, Mitchell E. & Sawyer, John E. & Nafziger, Emerson D. & Huber, Isaiah & Thorburn, Peter J. & Castellano, Michael J. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V., 2023. "Evaluating and improving APSIM's capacity in simulating long-term corn yield response to nitrogen in continuous- and rotated-corn systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Ahmed, Moiz Uddin & Hussain, Iqbal, 2022. "Prediction of Wheat Production Using Machine Learning Algorithms in northern areas of Pakistan," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    4. Lu, Junsheng & Xiang, Youzhen & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Hu, Tiantian, 2021. "Sustainable high grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity can be achieved in wheat-maize rotation system by changing irrigation and fertilization strategy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Movedi, Ermes & Valiante, Daniele & Colosio, Alessandro & Corengia, Luca & Cossa, Stefano & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2022. "A new approach for modeling crop-weed interaction targeting management support in operational contexts: A case study on the rice weeds barnyardgrass and red rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    2. Wang, Yuehua & Wang, Zhongwu & Wu, Lianhai & Li, Haigang & Li, Jiangwen & Zhu, Aimin & Jin, Yuxi & Han, Guodong, 2024. "Effects of grazing and climate change on aboveground standing biomass and sheep live weight changes in the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Styczen, M. & Poulsen, R.N. & Falk, A.K. & Jørgensen, G.H., 2010. "Management model for decision support when applying low quality water in irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 472-481, December.
    4. Amarasingha, R.P.R.K. & Suriyagoda, L.D.B. & Marambe, B. & Gaydon, D.S. & Galagedara, L.W. & Punyawardena, R. & Silva, G.L.L.P. & Nidumolu, U. & Howden, M., 2015. "Simulation of crop and water productivity for rice (Oryza sativa L.) using APSIM under diverse agro-climatic conditions and water management techniques in Sri Lanka," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-143.
    5. Yan Shan & Mingbin Huang & Paul Harris & Lianhai Wu, 2021. "A Sensitivity Analysis of the SPACSYS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    6. Hampf, Anna C. & Carauta, Marcelo & Latynskiy, Evgeny & Libera, Affonso A.D. & Monteiro, Leonardo & Sentelhas, Paulo & Troost, Christian & Berger, Thomas & Nendel, Claas, 2018. "The biophysical and socio-economic dimension of yield gaps in the southern Amazon – A bio-economic modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Patel, D.P. & Das, Anup & Munda, G.C. & Ghosh, P.K. & Bordoloi, Juri Sandhya & Kumar, Manoj, 2010. "Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1269-1276, September.
    8. Zhou, Zhenjiang & Plauborg, Finn & Parsons, David & Andersen, Mathias Neumann, 2018. "Potato canopy growth, yield and soil water dynamics under different irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 9-18.
    9. Michael Kuhwald & Katja Dörnhöfer & Natascha Oppelt & Rainer Duttmann, 2018. "Spatially Explicit Soil Compaction Risk Assessment of Arable Soils at Regional Scale: The SaSCiA-Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Carauta, Marcelo & Troost, Christian & Guzman-Bustamante, Ivan & Hampf, Anna & Libera, Affonso & Meurer, Katharina & Bönecke, Eric & Franko, Uwe & Ribeiro Rodrigues, Renato de Aragão & Berger, Thomas, 2021. "Climate-related land use policies in Brazil: How much has been achieved with economic incentives in agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Grotelüschen, Kristina & Gaydon, Donald S. & Langensiepen, Matthias & Ziegler, Susanne & Kwesiga, Julius & Senthilkumar, Kalimuthu & Whitbread, Anthony M. & Becker, Mathias, 2021. "Assessing the effects of management and hydro-edaphic conditions on rice in contrasting East African wetlands using experimental and modelling approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Boling, A.A. & Tuong, T.P. & van Keulen, H. & Bouman, B.A.M. & Suganda, H. & Spiertz, J.H.J., 2010. "Yield gap of rainfed rice in farmers' fields in Central Java, Indonesia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 307-315, June.
    13. Shokrana, Md Sami Bin & Ghane, Ehsan & Abdalaal, Yousef & Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan, 2023. "Predicting the effect of weir management on the discharge of a controlled drainage system in a changing climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    14. Wu, L. & Harris, P. & Misselbrook, T.H. & Lee, M.R.F., 2022. "Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Yu, Qianan & Cui, Yuanlai, 2022. "Improvement and testing of ORYZA model water balance modules for alternate wetting and drying irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    16. Bown, James L. & Pachepsky, Elizaveta & Eberst, Alistair & Bausenwein, Ursula & Millard, Peter & Squire, Geoff R. & Crawford, John W., 2007. "Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 264-276.
    17. Xu, Baoli & Shao, Dongguo & Tan, Xuezhi & Yang, Xia & Gu, Wenquan & Li, Haoxin, 2017. "Evaluation of soil water percolation under different irrigation practices, antecedent moisture and groundwater depths in paddy fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 149-158.
    18. Höglind, Mats & Cameron, David & Persson, Tomas & Huang, Xiao & van Oijen, Marcel, 2020. "BASGRA_N: A model for grassland productivity, quality and greenhouse gas balance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    19. Wu, Lianhai & Curceac, Stelian & Atkinson, Peter M. & Milne, Alice & Harris, Paul, 2021. "A case study on the effects of data temporal resolution on the simulation of water flux extremes using a process-based model at the grassland field scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Carauta, Marcelo & Parussis, Julia & Hampf, Anna & Libera, Affonso & Berger, Thomas, 2021. "No more double cropping in Mato Grosso, Brazil? Evaluating the potential impact of climate change on the profitability of farm systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:154:y:2017:i:c:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.