IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ4/2014-01-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demografik Deðiþkenler ve Dizi Türünün Dizi Tanýtým Mecralarýna Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma

Author

Listed:
  • Dilek PENPECE

    (Adana Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Adana Author-Name: Elife YILMAZ
    Adana Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Adana)

Abstract

Türkiye'de son dönemde ciddi seviyede ivme kazanan dizi sektörü, 50’den fazla ülkeye dizi ihracatý gerçekleþtirerek sektörünün ve dolayýsýyla iliþkili diðer sektörlerin de geliþimine katký saðlamaktadýr. Ancak senaryolar, oyuncularýn yeteneði ve ünü, sahne, dekor, kostüm, tasarým ve yayýn saati gibi birçok deðiþkeni göz önünde bulundurduðu gözlenen dizi ekibi dizilerin yayýndan kaldýrýlmasý durumu ile karþýlaþmaktadýrlar. Bu açýdan uzun süre yayýnda kalan ve ciddi oranda izleyici reytingi alan dizilerin oluþmasý ile ihracat potansiyelinin de geliþeceði düþünüldüðünde, dizi pazarlanmasý açýsýndan tanýtýmýn gerekliliði ortadadýr. Bu araþtýrmanýn amacý; izleyicilerin karþýlaþtýklarý dizi tanýtým mecralarýnýn neler olduðunu ortaya koyarak, onlarýn sosyo-demografik özellikleri, izledikleri dizi türleri ve karþýlaþtýklarý dizi tanýtým mecralarý arasýnda ne gibi farklýlýklar olduðunu belirlemektir. Bu amaca ulaþmak için gerçekleþtirilen saha araþtýrmasýnda, izleyicilerin karþýlaþtýklarý dizi tanýtým mecralarý ortaya koyularak; cinsiyet, yaþ ve eðitim durumu ile izlenen dizi türleri arasýnda anlamlý farklýlýk olduðu sonucuna ulaþýlmýþtýr. Benzer þekilde izleyicilerin cinsiyet, yaþ, eðitim durumu ile karþýlaþtýklarý dizi tanýtým mecralarýnýn bazýlarý arasýnda anlamlý farklýlýk vardýr.

Suggested Citation

  • Dilek PENPECE, 2014. "Demografik Deðiþkenler ve Dizi Türünün Dizi Tanýtým Mecralarýna Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araþtýrma," Isletme ve Iktisat Calismalari Dergisi, Econjournals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ4:2014-01-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.isletmeiktisat.com/index.php/iicd/article/download/12/pdf_6
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.isletmeiktisat.com/index.php/iicd/article/view/12/pdf_6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovannucci, Daniele & Koekoek, Freek Jan, 2003. "The State of Sustainable Coffee: A Study of Twelve Major Markets," MPRA Paper 17172, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Caroline Doran, 2009. "The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 549-563, February.
    3. Tierney Bondy & Vishal Talwar, 2011. "Through Thick and Thin: How Fair Trade Consumers Have Reacted to the Global Economic Recession," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 365-383, July.
    4. Michal Carrington & Benjamin Neville & Gregory Whitwell, 2010. "Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 139-158, November.
    5. Andreas Chatzidakis & Sally Hibbert & Andrew Smith, 2007. "Why People Don’t Take their Concerns about Fair Trade to the Supermarket: The Role of Neutralisation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 89-100, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fred A. Yamoah, 2014. "An Exploratory Study of Marketing Factors Influencing Fairtrade Food Buying Behaviour in the UK," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 4(1), pages 13-23.
    2. Fred Amofa Yamoah & Rachel Duffy & Dan Petrovici & Andrew Fearne, 2016. "Towards a Framework for Understanding Fairtrade Purchase Intention in the Mainstream Environment of Supermarkets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 181-197, June.
    3. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    4. Kutaula, Smirti & Gillani, Alvina & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Christodoulides, Paul, 2022. "Integrating fair trade with circular economy: Personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1087-1102.
    5. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    6. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    7. Michal Carrington & Andreas Chatzidakis & Helen Goworek & Deirdre Shaw, 2021. "Consumption Ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 215-238, January.
    8. Eleni Papaoikonomou & Mireia Valverde & Gerard Ryan, 2012. "Articulating the Meanings of Collective Experiences of Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 15-32, September.
    9. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    10. Natalia Stanulewicz & Emily Knox & Melanie Narayanasamy & Noureen Shivji & Kamlesh Khunti & Holly Blake, 2019. "Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-36, December.
    11. Etilé, Fabrice & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and the economics of consumer social responsibility," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 94(2).
    12. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    13. Smirti Kutaula & Alvina Gillani & Diana Gregory-Smith & Boris Bartikowski, 2024. "Ethical Consumerism in Emerging Markets: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 651-673, May.
    14. McCarthy, Breda, 2024. "Moral licensing and habits: Do solar households make negligent choices?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Ken Peattie & Anthony Samuel, 2018. "Fairtrade Towns as Unconventional Networks of Ethical Activism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 265-282, November.
    16. Brunen, Ann-Christine & Laubach, Oliver, 2022. "Do sustainable consumers prefer socially responsible investments? A study among the users of robo advisors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Evon Scott & Giorgos Kallis & Christos Zografos, 2019. "Why environmentalists eat meat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-9, July.
    18. Anne Wiedemann & Josephine Lauterbach & Anna Maria Häring, 2023. "In Search of the Niche—Targeting Lamb Meat Consumers in North-East Germany to Communicate the Ecosystem Services of Extensive Sheep Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Pamela Yeow & Alison Dean & Danielle Tucker, 2014. "Bags for Life: The Embedding of Ethical Consumerism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 87-99, November.
    20. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2019. "Relationships and nature of contracts in the distribution structure for responsible trade," Working papers of CATT hal-02937865, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dizi Tanýtým Mecralarý; Dizi Pazarlama; Ki-kare ve Uyum Analizi;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ4:2014-01-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.isletmeiktisat.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.