IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2019-02-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turbine Wind Placement with Staggered Layout as a Strategy to Maximize Annual Energy Production in Onshore Wind Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Dwiana Hendrawati

    (Departement of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electro Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia,)

  • Adi Soeprijanto

    (Departement of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electro Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia,)

  • Mochamad Ashari

    (Departement of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electro Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia,)

Abstract

The Wind Energy potential of Indonesia based on the General Plan of National Energy is 60,647.0 MW at wind speeds of 4 meters per second or more. Considerable potential and untapped optimally, is a challenge that gives direction to the development and policy of the wind energy sector in Indonesia. The policy covers a wide range of activities including study technology for utilization of large-scale wind energy source or called Wind Farms. To achieve these targets, the initial policy that can be applied is the utilization of wind energy and technology development of land-based wind farm for onshore wind farm. Land limitations on onshore directs this research in the attempt to increase AEP (Annual Energy Production) with a fixed land area. This is synonymous with minimizing the cost and is a WFO (Wind Farm Optimization) problem. The completion of WFO in this study was carried out by reconstructing the placement of wind turbines into a staggered layout. To test the performance improvement of the proposed design, by comparing the AEP of the proposed (staggered) layout and conventional (aligned) layout. The simulation shows that staggered layouts can reduce costs and increase AEP between 1.2-8.7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwiana Hendrawati & Adi Soeprijanto & Mochamad Ashari, 2019. "Turbine Wind Placement with Staggered Layout as a Strategy to Maximize Annual Energy Production in Onshore Wind Farms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 334-340.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-02-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/7437/4244
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/7437/4244
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    2. Chowdhury, Souma & Zhang, Jie & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2013. "Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 273-282.
    3. González, Javier Serrano & Gonzalez Rodriguez, Angel G. & Mora, José Castro & Santos, Jesús Riquelme & Payan, Manuel Burgos, 2010. "Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1671-1681.
    4. Adaramola, M.S. & Krogstad, P.-Å., 2011. "Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2078-2086.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Dinçer, A.E. & Demir, A. & Yılmaz, K., 2024. "Multi-objective turbine allocation on a wind farm site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    3. Souma Chowdhury & Ali Mehmani & Jie Zhang & Achille Messac, 2016. "Market Suitability and Performance Tradeoffs Offered by Commercial Wind Turbines across Differing Wind Regimes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Park, Jinkyoo & Law, Kincho H., 2015. "Layout optimization for maximizing wind farm power production using sequential convex programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 320-334.
    5. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    6. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Wang, Longyan & Cholette, Michael E. & Zhou, Yunkai & Yuan, Jianping & Tan, Andy C.C. & Gu, Yuantong, 2018. "Effectiveness of optimized control strategy and different hub height turbines on a real wind farm optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 819-829.
    8. Kaldellis, John K. & Triantafyllou, Panagiotis & Stinis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Critical evaluation of Wind Turbines’ analytical wake models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Song, Mengxuan & Chen, Kai & Wang, Jun, 2020. "A two-level approach for three-dimensional micro-siting optimization of large-scale wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. DuPont, Bryony & Cagan, Jonathan & Moriarty, Patrick, 2016. "An advanced modeling system for optimization of wind farm layout and wind turbine sizing using a multi-level extended pattern search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 802-814.
    12. Abdulrahman, Mamdouh & Wood, David, 2017. "Investigating the Power-COE trade-off for wind farm layout optimization considering commercial turbine selection and hub height variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 267-278.
    13. Chen, K. & Song, M.X. & Zhang, X. & Wang, S.F., 2016. "Wind turbine layout optimization with multiple hub height wind turbines using greedy algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 676-686.
    14. Jim Kuo & Kevin Pan & Ni Li & He Shen, 2020. "Wind Farm Yaw Optimization via Random Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Lidar assisted wake redirection in wind farms: A data driven approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 484-493.
    16. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Gualous, Hamid, 2017. "Assessing the effectiveness of a global optimum strategy within a tidal farm for power maximization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 653-666.
    17. Yamani Douzi Sorkhabi, Sami & Romero, David A. & Yan, Gary Kai & Gu, Michelle Dao & Moran, Joaquin & Morgenroth, Michael & Amon, Cristina H., 2016. "The impact of land use constraints in multi-objective energy-noise wind farm layout optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 359-370.
    18. Rodrigues, S. & Bauer, P. & Bosman, Peter A.N., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization of wind farm layouts – Complexity, constraint handling and scalability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 587-609.
    19. Iqbal, M. & Azam, M. & Naeem, M. & Khwaja, A.S. & Anpalagan, A., 2014. "Optimization classification, algorithms and tools for renewable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 640-654.
    20. Yang, Kyoungboo & Kwak, Gyeongil & Cho, Kyungho & Huh, Jongchul, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization for wake effect uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 983-995.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wind Farms; Aligned and staggered layout; Cost; Annual Energy production;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-02-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.