IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-06-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Structural Model of Whistle Blowing System on Government Procurement Fraud: Examining Mediating Effect of Investigative Audit

Author

Listed:
  • Femilia Zahra

    (Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Ikbal Abdullah

    (Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Din

    (Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia)

  • Mohammad Fadli

    (Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia)

  • Hairul Azrin Haji Besar

    (University of Brunnei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam)

  • Jati Kasuma Ali

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study aims to develop a fraud disclosure model in government procurement in Indonesia through a whistle blowing system with an investigative audit as a mediator. Disclosure of fraud is the result of an investigative audit. The effectiveness of the implementation of investigative audit procedures will be achieved if the auditor has the ability to carry out each stage in the audit standard. To maximize the performance of investigative audits, a system is needed to uncover fraud. The whistleblowing system is expected to be an effective tool to reveal fraud in government procurement. The research was conducted by distributing questionnaires to respondents electronically by sending a google form link containing a list of questions to auditors at the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) and internal auditors at the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) throughout Indonesia. The results of the study found that the use of a whistle blowing system could increase the effectiveness of investigative audits on government procurement. Another finding is that investigative audits can reduce the disclosure of government procurement fraud. The effectiveness of the whistle blowing system in reducing the level of disclosure of government procurement fraud does not occur directly, but must be mediated by a good investigative audit. The results of this study indicate that the reporting of government procurement fraud cases on the whistle blowing system must be followed up with a thorough investigative audit so that disclosures of government procurement fraud cases can be traced better. Additional analysis in this study shows that although the functions of external auditors and internal auditors are different, the level and type of disclosure of government procurement fraud do not differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Femilia Zahra & Muhammad Ikbal Abdullah & Muhammad Din & Mohammad Fadli & Hairul Azrin Haji Besar & Jati Kasuma Ali, 2024. "Investigating the Structural Model of Whistle Blowing System on Government Procurement Fraud: Examining Mediating Effect of Investigative Audit," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 302-309, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/16150/8362
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/16150
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kishor Vaidya & A. S. M. Sajeev & Guy Callender, 2006. "Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1/2), pages 70-99, March.
    2. Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp, 2009. "Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 545-556, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Smaili & Paulina Arroyo, 2019. "Categorization of Whistleblowers Using the Whistleblowing Triangle," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 95-117, June.
    2. Sabrina Oktaria Sihombing,, 2017. "Predicting intention to share news through social media: An empirical analysis in Indonesian youth context," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(4), pages 468-477, October.
    3. Sheng-min Liu & Jian-qiao Liao & Hongguo Wei, 2015. "Authentic Leadership and Whistleblowing: Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Personal Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 107-119, September.
    4. Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp & Myeongsil Park, 2014. "The Influence of an Observer’s Value Orientation and Personality Type on Attitudes Toward Whistleblowing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 121-129, March.
    5. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    6. Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad Author_Email: syahrul.ahmar@johor.uitm.edu.my & Malcolm Smith & Zubaidah Ismail & Rahimah Mohamed Yunos, 2011. "Internal Whistleblowing Intentions: Influence Of Internal Auditors’ Demographic And Individual Factors," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-051-155, Conference Master Resources.
    7. Raja Adri Satriawan Surya, 2017. "Whistle Blowing in The Police Sector: The Importance of Control Behaviour Factor and Professional Commitment," GATR Journals afr128, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Ni Made Mega Abdi Utami & Gugus Irianto & Yeney Widya Prihatiningtias, 2020. "Analyzing the effect of financial reward, personal cost and reporting channel on whistleblowing intentions utilizing an experimental study," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 125-132, March.
    9. Sebastian Oelrich & Anne Chwolka, 2024. "When deviants talk: the role of Dark Triad traits and moral reasoning in whistleblowing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 333-369, September.
    10. Verschuuren, Pim, 2020. "Whistleblowing determinants and the effectiveness of reporting channels in the international sports sector," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 142-154.
    11. Hengky Latan & Christian M. Ringle & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, 2018. "Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 573-588, October.
    12. Horiguchi, Shinji & Haniffa, Roszaini & Hudaib, Mohammad, 2024. "Whistleblowing intentions by public accountants in a non-Western society: The case of Japanese accountants," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Susana Gago-Rodríguez & Gilberto Márquez-Illescas & Manuel Núñez-Nickel, 2020. "Denial of Corruption: Voluntary Disclosure of Bribery Information," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 609-626, March.
    14. Sebastian Oelrich, 2019. "Making regulation fit by taking irrationality into account: the case of the whistleblower," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 175-207, April.
    15. Lalarukh Shabbir & Muhammad Hassan, 2022. "Impact of Transformational Leadership on Constructive Deviant Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Felt Obligation," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 243-262, june.
    16. Anantawikrama Tungga Atmadja & Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra & Daniel T.H. Manurung, 2019. "Proactive Fraud Audit, Whistleblowing and Cultural Implementation of Tri Hita Karana for Fraud Prevention," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 201-214.
    17. Jin Cheng & Haiqing Bai & Xijuan Yang, 2019. "Ethical Leadership and Internal Whistleblowing: A Mediated Moderation Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 115-130, March.
    18. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2021. "Social Media as a Form of Virtual Whistleblowing: Empirical Evidence for Elements of the Diamond Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 529-548, December.
    19. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2019. "‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 189-204, November.
    20. Waseem Yousaf & Raheel Jamil, 2020. "Does Moral Intensity Affect the Whistleblowing Intentions?," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(2), pages 84-99, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fraud; Government Procurement; Whistle Blowing System; Audit Investigation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.