IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2017-01-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Risk, Investment Performance and Intentions in Emerging Stock Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Phung Thai Minh Trang

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Commerce, Hoa Sen University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,)

  • Nguyen Huu Tho

    (Department of Finance-Project, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.)

Abstract

The study built the new measurement scales of risk perception in investing in stock types trading on the emerging stock market, and then explored the effects of perceived risk on investment performance and intentions of individual investors. The study employed mixed research methods including in-depth interviews, a pilot study involving 50 investors, a survey distributed to 465 retail investors. Results showed that perceived risk had the direct positive impact on both investment performance and intentions. Perceived risk also had the indirect influence on intentions to invest through investment performance. For managerial decisions, investors are recommended to draw attention to the risks of investing in stocks labelled as warned , controlled , and halted trading . The higher investors perceive the risks of these stock types, the greater they are satisfied with their investment decisions, the recent rate of return achieved, and the more they intend to invest in the next time. Securities corporations have regularly organized seminars, workshops or training courses about investing in the kinds of stocks, updated regulations of stock investment in time, and improved the quality of listed companies to attract more investors to the stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Phung Thai Minh Trang & Nguyen Huu Tho, 2017. "Perceived Risk, Investment Performance and Intentions in Emerging Stock Markets," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 269-278.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-01-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/3381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Nicholas Barberis & Ming Huang, 2001. "Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1247-1292, August.
    3. Nicholas Barberis & Ming Huang, 2001. "Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns," NBER Working Papers 8190, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanmugam Annamalah & Murali Raman & Govindan Marthandan & Aravindan Kalisri Logeswaran, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Determinants of an Investor’s Decision in Unit Trust Investment," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Nur Alya Afiqah Binti Mahat & Wei-Theng Lau, 2023. "Financial Literacy, Experience, Risk Tolerance and Investment Behavior: Observations during Pandemic," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 558-573, October.
    3. Loc Dong Truong & H. Swint Friday, 2021. "The January Effect and Lunar New Year Influences in Frontier Markets: Evidence from the Vietnam Stock Market," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 28-34.
    4. Chunling Li & Nosherwan Khaliq & Leslie Chinove & Usama Khaliq & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2023. "Cryptocurrency Acceptance Model to Analyze Consumers’ Usage Intention: Evidence From Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    5. Saleh M. Shehata & Alaa M. Abdeljawad & Loqman A. Mazouz & Lamia Yousif Khalaf Aldossary & Maryam Y. Alsaeed & Mohamed Noureldin Sayed, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Perceived Risks in the Relationship between Financial Knowledge and the Intention to Invest in the Saudi Arabian Stock Market," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Pallavi Dogra & Arun Kaushal & Prateek Kalia, 2024. "What drives the investment intentions of emerging economy millennials? Examining the effect of financial advertisement with the PLS-SEM," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 276-291, June.
    7. Syed Aliya Zahera & Rohit Bansal, 2018. "Do investors exhibit behavioral biases in investment decision making? A systematic review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 210-251, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hirshleifer & Danling Jiang, 2010. "A Financing-Based Misvaluation Factor and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(9), pages 3401-3436.
    2. Johannes Abeler & Felix Marklein, 2017. "Fungibility, Labels, and Consumption," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 99-127.
    3. Kumar, Alok, 2007. "Do the diversification choices of individual investors influence stock returns?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 362-390, November.
    4. Elie Matta & Jean McGuire, 2008. "Too Risky to Hold? The Effect of Downside Risk, Accumulated Equity Wealth, and Firm Performance on CEO Equity Reduction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 567-580, August.
    5. Barberis, Nicholas & Xiong, Wei, 2012. "Realization utility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 251-271.
    6. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    7. Darren Duxbury & Robert Hudson & Kevin Keasey & Zhishu Yang & Songyao Yao, 2013. "How prior realized outcomes affect portfolio decisions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 611-629, November.
    8. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, July.
    9. Yehuda Izhakian, 2012. "Ambiguity Measurement," Working Papers 12-01, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    10. Nabil I. Al-Najjar & Luciano Pomatto, 2016. "Choice under aggregate uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 187-209, February.
    11. Veld, Chris & Veld-Merkoulova, Yulia V., 2008. "The risk perceptions of individual investors," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 226-252, April.
    12. repec:zbw:bofitp:2019_022 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun, 2013. "Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 411-429, March.
    14. Sergio Ortobelli Lozza & Enrico Angelelli & Daniele Toninelli, 2011. "Set-Portfolio Selection with the Use of Market Stochastic Bounds," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(0), pages 5-24, November.
    15. Mohamed S. Ahmed & John A. Doukas, 2021. "Revisiting disposition effect and momentum: a quantile regression perspective," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1087-1128, April.
    16. Jondeau, Eric & Zhang, Qunzi & Zhu, Xiaoneng, 2019. "Average skewness matters," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 29-47.
    17. Zhu, Zhaobo & Ding, Wenjie & Jin, Yi & Shen, Dehua, 2023. "Dissecting the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: A fundamental analysis approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Mingdi Xin & Arun Sundararajan, 2020. "Nonlinear Pricing of Software with Local Demand Inelasticity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1224-1239, December.
    19. Longstaff, Francis A. & Piazzesi, Monika, 2004. "Corporate earnings and the equity premium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 401-421, December.
    20. Andrew Ang & Robert J. Hodrick & Yuhang Xing & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2006. "The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 259-299, February.
    21. Luiz Félix & Roman Kräussl & Philip Stork, 2019. "Single Stock Call Options as Lottery Tickets: Overpricing and Investor Sentiment," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 385-407, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Investment Performance; Intentions; Perceived Risk; Emerging Stock Markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-01-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.