IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-21-00116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How effective is the 2020 stimulus check in Minnesota and Wisconsin counties?

Author

Listed:
  • Rubana Mahjabeen

    (University of Wisconsin-Superior)

  • Praopan Pratoomchat

    (University of Wisconsin-Superior)

Abstract

This study estimates the multiplier impact of the first round of stimulus checks provided under the CARES Act 2020. Data was collected through a phone and online survey of individuals in 25 counties of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Survey data is utilized to compute the average marginal propensity to save and the multiplier. The results demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the location-specific multipliers and income-specific multipliers of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Counties with smaller towns have a higher multiplier impact (2.98) compared to counties with larger cities (2.24), and lower-income individuals create a larger multiplier impact (3.17) as opposed to higher-income individuals (2.00). The study finds that the gender-specific multipliers are not statistically different.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubana Mahjabeen & Praopan Pratoomchat, 2021. "How effective is the 2020 stimulus check in Minnesota and Wisconsin counties?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 1655-1665.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-00116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2021/Volume41/EB-21-V41-I3-P141.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan J. Auerbach & Yuriy Gorodnichenko, 2012. "Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-27, May.
    2. L'industria, 2020. "Call for Papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 787-801.
    3. Sumit Agarwal & Chunlin Liu & Nicholas S. Souleles, 2007. "The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates-Evidence from Consumer Credit Data," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(6), pages 986-1019, December.
    4. Sokbae Lee & Yuan Liao & Myung Hwan Seo & Youngki Shin, 2020. "Desperate Times Call For Desperate Measures: Government Spending Multipliers In Hard Times," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(4), pages 1949-1957, October.
    5. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 173-187.
    6. L'industria, 2020. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 367-370.
    7. Valerie A. Ramey & Sarah Zubairy, 2018. "Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from US Historical Data," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 850-901.
    8. Jianjun Zhang & Shu Lin, 2014. "Business and Government," Springer Books, in: Zhi-Xue Zhang & Jianjun Zhang (ed.), Understanding Chinese Firms from Multiple Perspectives, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 51-79, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pattaphol Yuktadatta & Shunsuke Ono & Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan & Yoshihiko Kadoya, 2022. "Satisfaction with the COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Policy: A Study of the Special Cash Payment Policy for Residents of Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    2. Basso, Gaetano & Boeri, Tito & Caiumi, Alessandro & Paccagnella, Marco, 2020. "The New Hazardous Jobs and Worker Reallocation," IZA Discussion Papers 13532, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Jauernig, Johanna & Uhl, Matthias & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2021. "The ethics of corporate hypocrisy: An experimental approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 131.
    4. Reijo Savolainen & Leslie Thomson, 2022. "Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 511-527, April.
    5. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Scheaf, David J. & Carr, Jon C. & Pollack, Jeffrey M., 2022. "An agentic perspective of resourcefulness: Self-reliant and joint resourcefulness behaviors within the entrepreneurship process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    6. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Bylicki, Michał & Budziński, Wiktor & Buczyński, Mateusz, 2022. "Valuing externalities of outdoor advertising in an urban setting – the case of Warsaw," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Lee Yong-Shik, 2020. "Law and Development: Three Irreconcilable Interests – Call for a New Beginning," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 321-333, January.
    8. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    9. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & María-del-Carmen Granada-Abarzuza, 2021. "The Influence of Female Directors and Institutional Pressures on Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms in Latin America," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Choi, Sangyup & Shin, Junhyeok, 2023. "Household indebtedness and the macroeconomic effects of tax changes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 22-52.
    11. Aram TERZYAN, 2020. "Change or continuity? Exploring post-revolution state - building in Ukraine and Armenia," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(1), pages 20-41, May.
    12. Michael McAleer, 2021. "A Critique of Recent Medical Research in JAMA on COVID-19," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(1), pages 40-142, March.
    13. Cristiano, S. & Ulgiati, S. & Gonella, F., 2021. "Systemic sustainability and resilience assessment of health systems, addressing global societal priorities: Learnings from a top nonprofit hospital in a bioclimatic building in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Benedikt Fecher & Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, June.
    15. Charpin, Remi & Lee, Min Kyung & Wu, Ting, 2021. "Mobile procurement platforms: Bridging the online and offline worlds in China's restaurant industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Sims, Eric & Wolff, Jonathan, 2018. "The state-dependent effects of tax shocks," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 57-85.
    17. Heckelei, Thomas & Huettel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Rommel, Jens, 2021. "The replicability crisis and the p-value debate – what are the consequences for the agricultural and food economics community?," Discussion Papers 316369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    18. Graeme Auld & Steven Bernstein & Benjamin Cashore & Kelly Levin, 2021. "Managing pandemics as super wicked problems: lessons from, and for, COVID-19 and the climate crisis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 707-728, December.
    19. Vasja Vehovar & Zdenek Smutny & Alice R. Robbin, 2021. "What is Social Informatics from an International Perspective?," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 207-210.
    20. Christensen, Peter & Osman, Adam, 2021. "The Demand for Mobility: Evidence from an Experiment with Uber Riders," IZA Discussion Papers 14179, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Saving; Consumption; Multiplier; Household Economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-00116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.