IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v4y2015i4p67-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice Of Industrial Relocation With Aspects Of The Stakeholder: The Case Of Fethýye Industrial Area

Author

Listed:
  • Erdoðan GAVCAR
  • Ayþe ÇELÝK YETÝM

    (Muðla Sýtký Koçman Üniversitesi)

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to reveal the aspects of the stakeholder on relocation of Fethiye industrial site. Question form has been used to collect data. In total, question form was applied to 338 stakeholders. This study has been carried out in October 2015. As a result of the study, most of the stakeholders agree to relocate the industrial area.The majority of the survey participants indicated "The Motocross Event Venue Area" as the relocation area. There is no significant statistical difference between the aspects of relocation area with gender, ownership status, education status and age range.According to result of the study, the suggestion presented for relocation area with the aspects of the stakeholder will contribute to choice of industrial relocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdoðan GAVCAR & Ayþe ÇELÝK YETÝM, 2015. "Choice Of Industrial Relocation With Aspects Of The Stakeholder: The Case Of Fethýye Industrial Area," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 67-81, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:67-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://socialsciences.eurasianacademy.org/dergi/../dergi//paydas-bakis-acisi-ile-yeni-kurulus-yeri-secimi-fethiye-sanayi-sitesi-ornegi201507.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2021. "Sustainable development and financial institutions: Do banks' environmental policies influence customer deposits?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 643-656, January.
    2. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.
    3. Sajad Fayezi, 2022. "Student-Centered Curriculum Design and Evaluation in Logistics Management," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2013. "Accounting for Stakeholders or Shareholders? The Case of R&D Reporting," Post-Print hal-01002936, HAL.
    5. Godart, Frédéric & Pistilli, Luca, 2024. "The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Vikraman R & Shulagna Sarkar & Vishnukumar K & Selvarasu A, 2021. "Leading Sustainable CSR Efforts: A Case of Sneha Opportunity School by NLCIL," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 14(1), pages 110-125, June.
    7. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    8. Hiney, Noel & Efthymiou, Marina & Morgenroth, Edgar, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on Irish airport stakeholder relationships," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & José M. Merigó, 2018. "Subjective stakeholder dynamics relationships treatment: a methodological approach using fuzzy decision-making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 441-472, December.
    10. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    11. Natalia Vasilenko & Marck Khaykin & Natalia Kirsanova & Arunas Lapinskas & Larisa Makhova, 2020. "Issues for Development of Economic System for Subsurface Resource Management in Russia through Lens of Economic Process Servitization," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 44-48.
    12. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    13. Liu, Xianda & Hou, Wenxuan & Main, Brian G.M., 2022. "Anti-market sentiment and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from anti-Jewish pogroms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Hong Wang, 2010. "Factor analysis of corporate environmental responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 481-490, August.
    15. Gulsevim Yumuk Gunay, 2016. "The Test of Corporate Governance System in the Electric Utilities Industry," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 132-140, March.
    16. Marcello Mariani, 2020. "Web 2.0 and Destination Marketing: Current Trends and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    18. ChungMing Lau & Yuan Lu & Qiang Liang, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 73-87, June.
    19. Nicole Darnall & Irene Henriques & Perry Sadorsky, 2010. "Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1072-1094, September.
    20. Del Bosco, Barbara & Misani, Nicola, 2011. "Keeping the enemies close: The contribution of corporate social responsibility to reducing crime against the firm," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 87-98, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:67-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socialsciences.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.