IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/journl/y2016i3p68-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Needs for Accountability Reporting: Perspectives of Stakeholders of Malaysian Public Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Norida Basnan

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Mohd Fairuz Md. Salleh

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Azlina Ahmad

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Ismail Upawi

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Azizah Mohd Harun

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

Abstract

The study aims at exploring the needs of a broad group of stakeholders of Malaysian public universities with respect to information items that should be disclosed in the university annual report, and their views on the disclosure importance of the items. This is a preliminary study towards the effort to develop an accountability reporting framework for Malaysian public universities. A questionnaire survey on the universities? stakeholders representing each stakeholder group which include policy makers, students, parents, employers, the public, university management and employees, suppliers and oversight entities was carried out in order to identify and confirm the stakeholders? disclosure needs. It is expected that the needs of the stakeholders in terms of information to be reported are comprehensive which include financial and non-financial information; and there are differences in the views on the disclosure importance of information among the stakeholder groups. The findings of this study provide a clear understanding of the information that should be disclosed in the annual reports of Malaysian public universities for accountability purpose. The findings may potentially assist the public universities to improve the way they discharge their public accountability through annual reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Norida Basnan & Mohd Fairuz Md. Salleh & Azlina Ahmad & Ismail Upawi & Azizah Mohd Harun, 2016. "Information Needs for Accountability Reporting: Perspectives of Stakeholders of Malaysian Public Universities," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 68-82, JUNE.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/3353/3275
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Brooke Dobni & George Luffman, 2003. "Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 577-585, June.
    2. Daniels, Janet D. & Daniels, Craig E., 1991. "Municipal financial reports: What users want," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 15-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norida Basnan & Mohd Fairuz Md. Salleh & Azlina Ahmad & Ismail Upawi & Azizah Mohd Harun, 2016. "Information Needs for Accountability Reporting: Perspectives of Stakeholders of Malaysian Public Universities," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(3), pages 68-82, JUNE.
    2. Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2019. "Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Huguette Blanco & John Lennard & Sylvain Lamontagne, 2011. "Annual Reporting and Accountability by Municipalities in Canada: An Empirical Investigation," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 195-224, September.
    4. Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino & Paolo Esposito & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Measuring quality of popular annual financial reports: Features of the rewarded US reporting municipalities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 17-27, January.
    5. Lukas, Bryan A. & Whitwell, Gregory J. & Hill, Paul, 2007. "Export planning orientation and its antecedents: Evidence from exporting IT products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1282-1289, December.
    6. Dobni, C. Brooke & Sand, Christopher, 2018. "Strategy shift: Integrating strategy and the firm’s capability to innovate," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 797-808.
    7. Hasliza Abdul Halim & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Theresa C. F. Ho & T. Ramayah, 2017. "The Outsourcing Dilemma on Decision to Outsource Among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(2), pages 348-364, April.
    8. Gonzalez-Benito, Oscar & Gonzalez-Benito, Javier, 2008. "Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 752-762, February.
    9. Antonio CORREIA de BARROS & Hortensia BARANDAS & Paulo Alexandre PIRES, 2009. "Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Evaluate Export Performance: A Relational Approach," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 713-734, October.
    10. Lu Lin Zhou & James Onuche Ayegba & Emmanuel Onu Ayegba & Peace Maina Ayegba & Zhang Xin Jie, 2021. "Impact of dynamic capacities on the performance of food and beverage enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Heredia Pérez, Jorge A. & Geldes, Cristian & Kunc, Martin H. & Flores, Alejandro, 2023. "The effect of local institutions on the competitive strategies of exporters. The case of emerging economies in Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Helena Alves & Mario Raposo, 2010. "An Exploratory Research on the Stakeholders of a University," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 76-88, December.
    13. Yinghong Susan Wei & Hugh O’Neill & Nan Zhou, 2020. "How Does Perceived Integrity in Leadership Matter to Firms in a Transitional Economy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 623-641, December.
    14. Sasono Adi & Dwi Martani & Bambang Pamungkas & Robert A. Simanjuntak, 2016. "Analysis of the quality of performance report of the local government on websites: Indonesian case," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1229393-122, December.
    15. Chulmo Koo & Jaeki Song & Yong Jin Kim & Kichan Nam, 2007. "Do e-business strategies matter? The antecedents and relationship with firm performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 283-296, July.
    16. Dobni, C. Brooke, 2006. "The innovation blueprint," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 329-339.
    17. Emerson W. Mainardes & João Ferreira e Gerson Ontini, 2010. "Vantagens Competitivas em Instituições de Ensino Superior: proposta e teste de um modelo," Working Papers de Gestão, Economia e Marketing (Management, Economics and Marketing Working Papers) td06_2010, Universidade da Beira Interior, Departamento de Gestão e Economia (Portugal).
    18. Rahul Kumar Sett, 2018. "Market orientation − firm performance link in a dynamic environment: looking inside the black box," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 163-179, December.
    19. Stavroula Spyropoulou & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Dionysis Skarmeas & Neil A. Morgan, 2018. "Strategic goal accomplishment in export ventures: the role of capabilities, knowledge, and environment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 109-129, January.
    20. Lydia Kilcullen & Phil Hancock & H. Y. Izan, 2007. "User Requirements for Not-For-Profit Entity Financial Reporting: An International Comparison," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 26-37, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:68-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.