IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v10y2007iq2p37-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validité interne et validité externe de l’étude de cas:principes et mise en oeuvre pour un renforcement mutuel

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Ayerbe

    (Université de Nice)

  • Audrey Missonier

    (Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier)

Abstract

(VF)Les principes de validité externe et de validité interne de l’étude de cas sont souvent présentés comme deux dimensions indépendantes. Cet article ambitionne de dépasser ces approches dichotomiques pour étudier les rapprochements possibles entre validité interne et validité externe. Il s’appuie sur une analyse approfondie de ces concepts et des tactiques visant à les renforcer, au cours des différentes phases qui ponctuent le processus de recherche. Nous émettons l’hypothèse selon laquelle, si les principes de validité interne et externe se différencient aisément, la convergence de leurs tactiques conduit à leur renforcement mutuel.(VA)The principles of external validity and internal validity of case study research are often considered as two independent dimensions. This article aims at overcoming this opposition in order to study the possible links between internal and external validity. The paper is based on the analysis of these concepts and of the specific tactics to enforce them. We study these tactics during the various phases which punctuate the process of research. We make the assumption that the principles of internal and external validity are fundamentally different, but the convergence of their tactics leads to their mutual reinforcement.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Ayerbe & Audrey Missonier, 2007. "Validité interne et validité externe de l’étude de cas:principes et mise en oeuvre pour un renforcement mutuel," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(2), pages 37-62, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:10:y:2007:i:q2:p:37-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/102062.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanen Khanche & Karim Ben Kahla, 2018. "Intercultural Management between Tunisia and Europe," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 40-46, October.
    2. Angèle Renaud, 2013. "L'articulation des usages diagnostique et interactif d'un seul et même système de contrôle de gestion : le cas d'un système d'indicateurs environnementaux dans une entreprise française de vins et spir," Post-Print hal-00879214, HAL.
    3. Caroline Tahar & Laetitia Monnier-Senicourt, 2015. "Self-service accounting: Mass retailing recipes for chartered accountants [Le libre-service de l’expertise comptable : Recettes de la grande distribution pour experts comptables]," Post-Print hal-01188879, HAL.
    4. Caroline Tahar, 2016. "Quel pilotage pour des activités de service plus performantes ? Le cas du contrôle du Revenue Management," Post-Print hal-01900497, HAL.
    5. Hanen Khanche & Karim Ben Kahla, 2018. "Intercultural Management between Tunisia and Europe," Post-Print halshs-03117403, HAL.
    6. Angèle Renaud, 2014. "The controller's role in environmental management control [Le contrôle de gestion environnemental : quels rôles pour le contrôleur de gestion ?]," Post-Print halshs-01178066, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    2. Amin Vahidi & Alireza Aliahmad & Ebrahim Teimouri, 2019. "Evolution of Management Cybernetics and Viable System Model," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 297-314, June.
    3. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    4. Jim Sheffield, 2004. "The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 415-435, September.
    5. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    7. Garcia-Canal, Esteban & Rialp-Criado, Alex & Rialp-Criado, Josep, 2013. "Speed of ICT integration strategies in absorptions: Insights from a qualitative study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 295-307.
    8. Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    9. Sumantra Sarkar & Anthony Vance & Balasubramaniam Ramesh & Menelaos Demestihas & Daniel Thomas Wu, 2020. "The Influence of Professional Subculture on Information Security Policy Violations: A Field Study in a Healthcare Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1240-1259, December.
    10. Jackson Emerson Abraham, 2017. "Theoretical and Methodological Context of (Post)-Modern Econometrics and Competing Philosophical Discourses for Policy Prescription," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 119-129, December.
    11. Erastus Karanja & Aditya Sharma & Ibrahim Salama, 2020. "What does MIS survey research reveal about diversity and representativeness in the MIS field? A content analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1583-1628, March.
    12. Kwabena Asiama & Rohan Bennett & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2019. "Towards Responsible Consolidation of Customary Lands: A Research Synthesis," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Joerg Becker & Bjoern Niehaves & Karsten Klose, 2005. "A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    14. Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    15. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2023. "Case study research on innovation systems: paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Working Papers 65, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 15 May 2023.
    16. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Nathalie Mitev & Matthew Smith & Isabelle Walsh, 2017. "Renewing Literature Reviews in MIS Research? A Critical Realist Approach," Working Papers hal-01648133, HAL.
    17. Ricardi S. Adnan & Sonny Harry B. Harmadi & Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto & Nur Muhammaditya, 2023. "Institutional Reconstruction of Promoting and Maintaining the Level of Compliance with Health Protocols in Indonesia during the Pandemic," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 377-406, June.
    18. Amin Vahidi & Alireza Aliahmadi, 2019. "Describing the Necessity of Multi-Methodological Approach for Viable System Model: Case Study of Viable System Model and System Dynamics Multi-Methodology," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 13-37, February.
    19. Benjamin Barann & Jan H. Betzing & Marco Niemann & Benedikt Hoffmeister & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Exploring customers’ likeliness to use e-service touchpoints in brick and mortar retail," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 523-545, June.
    20. Ugljesa Marjanovic & Milan Delić & Bojan Lalic, 2016. "Developing a model to assess the success of e-learning systems: evidence from a manufacturing company in transitional economy," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 253-272, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    méthodologie; étude de cas; validité externe; validité interne; tactiques; methodology; case study; external validity; internal validity; tactics.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B49 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:10:y:2007:i:q2:p:37-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.