IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v52y2025i2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying individuals in same-sex couples using longitudinal administrative data from Canadian tax records: Opportunities and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-lan Winnie Yang

    (University of Alberta)

  • Nicole Denier

    (University of Alberta)

  • Xavier St-Denis

    (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS))

  • Sean Waite

    (University of Western Ontario)

Abstract

Background: Quantitative research on the social, demographic, and economic outcomes of sexual minorities has long been hampered by data shortfalls, with most surveys and censuses limited by sample sizes and/or a lack of direct questions on sexual identity. The growing availability of administrative data presents an opportunity to fill some of these gaps. Objective: This article highlights the challenges and opportunities involved with using a novel administrative dataset – the Longitudinal Administrative Databank, which includes 20% of Canadian tax filers – to study sexual minority populations in Canada. We identify three sources of bias, propose strategies to adjust for this bias, and introduce a measure of “inferred sexual minority status” to improve the identification of sexual minorities in tax data. Results: Administrative tax data offers significant advantages, including a large sample size, high-quality income data for individuals and linked family members, a longitudinal design, and the ability to trace individuals’ same-/different-sex partnership histories. Our adjustment strategies mitigate some biases in identifying same-sex couples, including underreporting, misclassification, and measurement errors. The estimated proportion of individuals in same-sex marriages closely aligns with Canadian census estimates from 2006–2021, while the proportion in same-sex common-law partnerships is underestimated. Finally, our earnings gaps analyses highlight the utility of the inferred sexual minority status measure. Contribution: This article contributes to research on sexual minority data landscapes, offering new insights into the identification and measures of sexual minority populations using longitudinal administrative tax data. Our approach points to new opportunities for studying the long-term longitudinal income and family dynamics of sexual minority populations on the national level.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-lan Winnie Yang & Nicole Denier & Xavier St-Denis & Sean Waite, 2025. "Studying individuals in same-sex couples using longitudinal administrative data from Canadian tax records: Opportunities and challenges," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 52(2), pages 25-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:2
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/2/52-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative data; tax data; same-sex couples; sexual orientation; sexual orientation earnings gap; Longitudinal Administrative Databank; Canada;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.