Author
Listed:
- Bruno Masquelier
(Université catholique de Louvain)
- Ashira Menashe-Oren
(Université catholique de Louvain)
- Benjamin-Samuel Schlüter
(University of Toronto)
- Atoumane Fall
(Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie)
- Stephane Helleringer
(New York University, Abu Dhabi)
Abstract
Background: In many low- and middle-income countries, the mortality of adults over 50 years of age is poorly monitored because death registration systems are deficient. Nationally representative surveys currently focus on the survival of children or adults aged 15 to 49 years. Objective: We propose to measure adult survival beyond age 50 via parental survival histories, in which survey respondents provide data on their parents’ ages at the time of the survey, and if deceased, their age at death and date of death. We evaluate the magnitude of possible selection bias in parental survival histories and quantify the sample sizes needed to estimate mortality at ages 50 to 79 with varying levels of precision. Methods: We created a population with known parental survival histories using the 2013 national census of Senegal augmented with microsimulations. Using a stratified two-stage sampling procedure, we then conducted household surveys of this artificial population. We compared reference mortality levels in the artificial population of adults aged 50 to 79 years with those inferred from parental survival histories. We also analyzed selection biases in simulated populations where mortality above age 50 is correlated with the number of adult children. Results: The inclusion of modules on parental survival in large-scale surveys, such as the Demographic and Health Surveys, could provide accurate and precise estimates of old-age mortality and capture time trends and age patterns. Estimates derived from parental survival histories are affected by an upward bias when mortality is positively correlated with fertility, and vice versa, but the bias is modest and can be partially corrected. Contribution: Parental survival histories are a promising method to fill important data gaps around mortality at older ages, although more research is needed on possible reporting errors.
Suggested Citation
Bruno Masquelier & Ashira Menashe-Oren & Benjamin-Samuel Schlüter & Atoumane Fall & Stephane Helleringer, 2024.
"Improving old-age mortality estimation with parental survival histories in surveys,"
Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(45), pages 1429-1470.
Handle:
RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:45
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.45
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.