IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v41y2019i24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The formal demography of kinship: A matrix formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Hal Caswell

    (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Abstract

Background: Any individual is surrounded by a network of kin that develops over her lifetime. In a justly famous paper, Goodman, Keyfitz, and Pullum (1974) presented formal calculations of the mean numbers of (female, matrilineal) kin implied by a mortality and fertility schedule. Objective: The aim of this paper is a new theory of kinship demography that provides age distributions as well as expected numbers, permits calculation of properties (e.g., dependency) of kin, is easily computable, and does not require simulation. Methods: The analysis relies on a novel application of the matrix formulation of cohort component population projection to describe the dynamics of a kinship network. The approach arises from the observation that the kin of a focal individual form a population, and can be modelled as one. Results: Kinship dynamics are described by a coupled system of non-autonomous matrix equations. I show how to calculate age distributions, total numbers, prevalence, dependency, and the experience of the death of relatives. As an example, I compare the kinship networks implied by the period vital rates of Japanese women in 1947 and 2014. Over this interval, fertility declined by 70% while life expectancy increased by 60%. The implications of these changes for kinship structure are profound; a lifetime dominated, under 1947 rates, by the experience of the death of kin has changed to one in which the death of kin is a rare event. On the other hand, the burden of dependent aged kin, including those suffering from dementia, is many-fold larger under 2014 rates. Contribution: This new theory opens to investigation hitherto inaccessible aspects of kinship, with potential applications to many problems in family demography.

Suggested Citation

  • Hal Caswell, 2019. "The formal demography of kinship: A matrix formulation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(24), pages 679-712.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:41:y:2019:i:24
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol41/24/41-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aramide Kazeem & Leif Jensen, 2017. "Orphan status, school attendance, and relationship to household head in Nigeria," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(22), pages 659-690.
    2. Thomas Pullum, 1982. "The Eventual Frequencies of Kin in a Stable Population," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(4), pages 549-565, November.
    3. Hal Caswell, 2008. "Perturbation analysis of nonlinear matrix population models," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 18(3), pages 59-116.
    4. Thomas Pullum & Douglas Wolf, 1991. "Correlations between frequencies of kin," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(3), pages 391-409, August.
    5. Xi Song & Robert D. Mare, 2017. "Short-Term and Long-Term Educational Mobility of Families: A Two-Sex Approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(1), pages 145-173, February.
    6. Noreen Goldman, 1978. "Estimating the intrinsic rate of increase of population from the average numbers of younger and older sisters," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(4), pages 499-507, November.
    7. Emilio Zagheni & Brittney Wagner, 2015. "The impact of demographic change on intergenerational transfers via bequests," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(18), pages 525-534.
    8. Xi Song, 2016. "Diverging Mobility Trajectories: Grandparent Effects on Educational Attainment in One- and Two-Parent Families in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 1905-1932, December.
    9. C. McDaniel & E. Hammel, 1984. "A Kin-Based measure of r and an evaluation of its effectiveness," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 21(1), pages 41-51, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Alburez-Gutierrez & Ugofilippo Basellini & Emilio Zagheni, 2022. "When do parents bury a child? Quantifying uncertainty in the parental age at offspring loss," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-016, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    2. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    3. Hal Caswell & Xi Song, 2021. "The formal demography of kinship III: Kinship dynamics with time-varying demographic rates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(16), pages 517-546.
    4. Diego Alburez-Gutierrez, 2021. "The demographic drivers of grief and memory after genocide in Guatemala," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2021-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    5. Sha Jiang & Wenyun Zuo & Zhen Guo & Hal Caswell & Shripad Tuljapurkar, 2023. "How does the demographic transition affect kinship networks?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(32), pages 899-930.
    6. Hal Caswell, 2022. "The formal demography of kinship IV: Two-sex models and their approximations," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(13), pages 359-396.
    7. Mallika Snyder & Diego Alburez-Gutierrez & Iván Williams & Emilio Zagheni, 2022. "Estimates from 11 countries show the significant impact of COVID-19 excess mortality on the incidence of family bereavement," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-010, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    8. Marta Pittavino & Bruno Arpino & Elena Pirani, 2024. "Kinlessness at older ages: Prevalence and heterogeneity in 27 countries," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2024_02, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    9. Hal Caswell, 2020. "The formal demography of kinship II: Multistate models, parity, and sibship," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(38), pages 1097-1146.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judith A. Seltzer, 2019. "Family Change and Changing Family Demography," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(2), pages 405-426, April.
    2. Sha Jiang & Wenyun Zuo & Zhen Guo & Hal Caswell & Shripad Tuljapurkar, 2023. "How does the demographic transition affect kinship networks?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(32), pages 899-930.
    3. Bhashkar Mazumder, 2018. "Intergenerational Mobility in the United States: What We Have Learned from the PSID," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 680(1), pages 213-234, November.
    4. Timothy M. Smeeding, 2018. "The PSID in Research and Policy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 680(1), pages 29-47, November.
    5. Hal Caswell & Xi Song, 2021. "The formal demography of kinship III: Kinship dynamics with time-varying demographic rates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(16), pages 517-546.
    6. Tomasz Wrycza & Annette Baudisch, 2012. "How life expectancy varies with perturbations in age-specific mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(13), pages 365-376.
    7. Jane Menken, 1985. "Age and fertility: How late can you wait?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(4), pages 469-483, November.
    8. Eva Beaujouan & Anne Solaz, 2016. "Are family sizes of parents and children still related? Revisiting the cross-generationalrelationship over the last century," Working Papers 223, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED).
    9. Ole Hexel & Diego Alburez-Gutierrez & Emilio Zagheni, 2024. "Family structure and bequest inequalities between black and white households in the United States, 1989-2022," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2024-008, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    10. Jan Skopek & Thomas Leopold, 2020. "Educational Reproduction in Germany: A Prospective Study Based on Retrospective Data," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1241-1270, August.
    11. Bozhechkova Alexandra & Trunin Pavel & Sinelnikova-Muryleva Elena & Petrova Diana & Chentsov Alexander, 2018. "Building of monetary and currency markets models," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 175P, pages 1-96.
    12. Markus Kotte & Volker Ludwig, 2011. "Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 207-226.
    13. Jo Blanden & Matthias Doepke & Jan Stuhler, 2022. "Education inequality," CEP Discussion Papers dp1849, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Martin Beznoska & Tobias Hentze & Maximilian Stockhausen, 2020. "The inheritance and gift tax in Germany: Reform potentials for tax revenue, efficiency and distribution," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 44(3), pages 385-417.
    15. Boyce, Mark S. & Baxter, Peter W.J. & Possingham, Hugh P., 2012. "Managing moose harvests by the seat of your pants," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 340-347.
    16. Michael Murphy & Duolao Wang, 2001. "Family-Level Continuities in Childbearing in Low-Fertility Societies," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 75-96, March.
    17. Alyson Raalte & Hal Caswell, 2013. "Perturbation Analysis of Indices of Lifespan Variability," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(5), pages 1615-1640, October.
    18. Michael Grätz, 2022. "When less conditioning provides better estimates: overcontrol and endogenous selection biases in research on intergenerational mobility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3769-3793, October.
    19. Coste, Christophe F.D. & Austerlitz, Frédéric & Pavard, Samuel, 2017. "Trait level analysis of multitrait population projection matrices," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 47-58.
    20. Hal Caswell, 2020. "The formal demography of kinship II: Multistate models, parity, and sibship," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(38), pages 1097-1146.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    kinship; family; generations; Goodman-Keyfitz-Pullum;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:41:y:2019:i:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.