IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v3y2000i4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of divorce in a traditional Muslim community in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Alam

    (International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B))

  • Sajal Saha

    (International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B))

  • Jeroen K Van Ginneken

    (Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI))

Abstract

This study examines the effects of spouses’ prior marital status and socio-demographic characteristics on the risk of divorce of 1762 Muslim marriages recorded in 1982-83 in Teknaf, Bangladesh. Grooms' prior marital status was categorized into never married, divorced, widowed or polygynous (already cohabiting with one or more wives) and brides’ prior marital status was categorized into never married, divorced or widowed. Divorce was recorded by following the marriages prospectively for five years. Due to the fact that a longitudinal study design was used, the quality of the information presented here is considered to be high. A discrete-time hazard logistic model was used to estimate the effects of spouses’ prior marital status and a number of socio-demographic variables on risk of divorce. Polygynous marriage, remarriage and divorce were found to be common in this traditional Muslim community. The odds of divorce were 2.5 times higher for grooms’ polygynous marriages and 1.6 times higher for brides’ remarriages compared to their peers’ first marriages. The odds of divorce decreased with marriage duration. The groom’s and bride’s low socio-economic status, illiteracy, and early age at marriage increased the odds of divorce. The odds of divorce were much higher if there was no birth in the preceding six months.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Alam & Sajal Saha & Jeroen K Van Ginneken, 2000. "Determinants of divorce in a traditional Muslim community in Bangladesh," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 3(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:3:y:2000:i:4
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol3/4/3-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Chamie & Samar Nsuly, 1981. "Sex differences in remarriage and spouse selection," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(3), pages 335-348, August.
    2. Teresa Martin & Larry Bumpass, 1989. "Recent trends in marital disruption," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 26(1), pages 37-51, February.
    3. James McCarthy, 1978. "A comparison of the probability of the dissolution of first and second marriages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(3), pages 345-359, August.
    4. Jane Menken & James Trussell & Debra Stempel & Ozer Babakol, 1981. "Proportional hazards life table models: an illustrative analysis of socio-demographic influences on marriage dissolution in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(2), pages 181-200, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gretchen C. Perry, 2021. "Non-Parental Investment in Children and Child Outcomes after Parental Death or Divorce in a Patrilocal Society," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Jeofrey Abalos, 2017. "Divorce and separation in the Philippines: Trends and correlates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(50), pages 1515-1548.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Chung Allen Li, 2006. "The institutionalization and pace of fertility in American stepfamilies," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 14(12), pages 237-266.
    2. Teresa Martin & Larry Bumpass, 1989. "Recent trends in marital disruption," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 26(1), pages 37-51, February.
    3. R. Kelly Raley & Larry L. Bumpass, 2003. "The topography of the divorce plateau," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 8(8), pages 245-260.
    4. Noreen Goldman, 1981. "Dissolution of first unions in Colombia, Panama, and Peru," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(4), pages 659-679, November.
    5. Deniz Yucel, 2016. "Together, Forever? Correlates of Marital Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 257-269, January.
    6. Sheela Kennedy & Steven Ruggles, 2014. "Breaking Up Is Hard to Count: The Rise of Divorce in the United States, 1980–2010," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(2), pages 587-598, April.
    7. Martin Brockerhoff, 1990. "Rural-to-Urban migration and child survival in Senegal," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 27(4), pages 601-616, November.
    8. Neil Bennett & David Bloom & Cynthia Miller, 1995. "The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 32(1), pages 47-62, February.
    9. repec:pri:crcwel:wp07-07-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Lucia Coppola & Mariachiara Di Cesare, 2008. "How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 18(4), pages 117-144.
    11. Magdalena M. Muszynska, 2006. "Woman’s employment and union disruption in a changing socio-economic context: the case of Russia," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2006-027, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    12. Liliana E. Pezzin & Robert A. Pollak & Barbara Steinberg Schone, 2008. "Parental Marital Disruption, Family Type, and Transfers to Disabled Elderly Parents," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(6), pages 349-358.
    13. repec:ilo:ilowps:292067 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Peter T. Leeson & Joshua Pierson, 2016. "Prenups," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 367-400.
    15. repec:pri:crcwel:wp06-28-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Marco Breschi & Alessio Fornasin & Matteo Manfredini & Marianna Zacchigna, 2009. "Family Composition and Remarriage in Pre-Transitional Italy: A Comparative Study," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 25(3), pages 277-296, August.
    17. Hector Chade & Gustavo Ventura, 2002. "Taxes and Marriage: A Two-Sided Search Analysis," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 43(3), pages 955-986, August.
    18. Andrew Cherlin, 1990. "Recent Changes in American Fertility, Marriage, and Divorce," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 510(1), pages 145-154, July.
    19. Liat Raz-Yurovich, 2010. "Men´s and women´s economic activity and first marriage: Jews in Israel, 1987-1995," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(29), pages 933-964.
    20. Jeffrey Kalian & J. Udry, 1986. "The determinants of effective fecundability based on the first birth interval," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 23(1), pages 53-66, February.
    21. Gillian Hamilton & Aloysius Siow, 2007. "Class, Gender and Marriage," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 10(4), pages 549-575, October.
    22. Lucia Coppola & Mariachiara Di Cesare, 2007. "How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2007-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    23. Nora Cate Schaeffer & Judith A. Seltzer & Marieka Klawitter, 1991. "Estimating Nonresponse and Response Bias," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 30-59, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bangladesh; divorce; marriage; polygyny; remarriage;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:3:y:2000:i:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.