IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v6y2024i1p258-288id251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence through Explainable AI: A Case Study in Financial Products

Author

Listed:
  • Sreenivasarao Amirineni

Abstract

Today, when the importance of data-based decision-making is impossible to question, the use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in business intelligence (BI) has inestimable benefits for the financial industry. This paper discusses how XAI influences predictive analytics in BI systems and how it may improve interpretability, and useful suggestions for financial product companies. Thus, within the context of this study, an XAI framework helps the financial institutions to employ higher-performing and more accurate models, like gradient boosting and neural networks, while sustaining interpretability required in tendentious planning and satisfying governance and supervision necessities. These studies reveal that, as applied to the credit scoring dilemma, XAI techniques such as SHAP and LIME do not only enhance prediction consistency and performance, but also offer a detailed understanding of customer behaviours, risk profiles and product performance. They help in interacting and acting within fields that involve decision making on aspects like customer loyalty, probable risks and audit. Furthermore, the study establishes that by incorporating XAI into BI improves model interpretability, which helps financial experts provide tangible rationale for analytical results and conform to regulatory directives. This framework and findings also support the importance of introducing XAI for financial BI applications to improve analytics practice within the sector. , enabling the generation of higher confidence, reliable decisions, which place the subject of XAI as a profound evolution of business intelligence in finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sreenivasarao Amirineni, 2024. "Enhancing Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence through Explainable AI: A Case Study in Financial Products," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 6(1), pages 258-288.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:258-288:id:251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/251
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Wu, 2024. "Bitcoin ETF: Opportunities and risk," Papers 2409.00270, arXiv.org.
    2. Vermeulen, Patrick, 2004. "Managing Product Innovation in Financial Services Firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 43-50, February.
    3. Henderson, Brian J. & Pearson, Neil D., 2011. "The dark side of financial innovation: A case study of the pricing of a retail financial product," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 227-247, May.
    4. Storey, Chris & Easingwood, Christopher J., 1999. "Types of New Product Performance: Evidence from the Consumer Financial Services Sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-203, October.
    5. Di Wu, 2024. "The effects of data preprocessing on probability of default model fairness," Papers 2408.15452, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamer Khraisha & Keren Arthur, 2018. "Can we have a general theory of financial innovation processes? A conceptual review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Nima Heirati & Aron O’Cass, 2016. "Supporting new product commercialization through managerial social ties and market knowledge development in an emerging economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 411-433, June.
    3. Entrop, Oliver & Fischer, Georg & McKenzie, Michael & Wilkens, Marco & Winkler, Christoph, 2016. "How does pricing affect investors’ product choice? Evidence from the market for discount certificates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 195-215.
    4. Rubtsov, Alexey, 2016. "Model misspecification and pricing of illiquid claims," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 242-249.
    5. Hamid Mohtadi & Stefan Ruediger, 2014. "Volatility and Transparency of Financial Markets in the MENA Region," BIFEC Book of Abstracts & Proceedings, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 1(2), pages 173-195, March.
    6. Mehmet Balcilar & Riza Demirer, 2014. "The Effect of Global Shocks and Volatility on Herd Behavior in Borsa Istanbul," BIFEC Book of Abstracts & Proceedings, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 1(2), pages 142-172, March.
    7. Schertler, Andrea, 2016. "Pricing effects when competitors arrive: The case of discount certificates in Germany," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 84-99.
    8. Thorp, S. & Bateman, H. & Dobrescu, L.I. & Newell, B.R. & Ortmann, A., 2020. "Flicking the switch: Simplifying disclosure to improve retirement plan choices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    9. Baule, Rainer & Münchhalfen, Patrick & Shkel, David & Tallau, Christian, 2023. "Fair-washing in the market for structured retail products? Voluntary self-regulation versus government regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Mark Egan & Gregor Matvos & Amit Seru, 2019. "The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(1), pages 233-295.
    11. Junyong He & Helen Hui Huang & Shunming Zhang, 2020. "Ambiguity Aversion, Information Acquisition, and Market Opacity," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 21(2), pages 263-329, November.
    12. Stephen G Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Olivia S Mitchell & Kim Peijnenburg, 2021. "Household Portfolio Underdiversification and Probability Weighting: Evidence from the Field," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(9), pages 4524-4563.
    13. Franklin Allen, 2012. "Trends in Financial Innovation and their Welfare Impact: an Overview," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 493-514, September.
    14. Allen, Franklin, 2011. "Trends in Financial Innovation and Their Welfare Impact an Overview," Working Papers 11-66, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    15. Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Antonio Duréndez & José António C. Santos, 2019. "Family Management and Firm Performance in Family SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Management Control Systems and Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Wesley Mendes-Da-Silva, 2015. "Financial Innovation: An Expanding Research Field," Journal of Financial Innovation, IBRIF - Instituto Brasileiro de Inovação Financeira, vol. 1(1), pages 1-1.
    17. Franklin Allen, 2012. "Trends in Financial Innovation and Their Welfare Impact: An Overview," DNB Working Papers 355, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    18. Baller, Stefanie & Entrop, Oliver & Schober, Alexander & Wilkens, Marco, 2017. "What drives performance in the speculative market of short-term exchange-traded retail products?," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-26-17, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    19. Milo Bianchi & Philippe Jehiel, 2019. "Bundling, Belief Dispersion, and Mispricing in Financial Markets," Working Papers halshs-02183306, HAL.
    20. Kunz, Alexis H. & Messner, Claude & Wallmeier, Martin, 2017. "Investors’ risk perceptions of structured financial products with worst-of payout characteristics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 66-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:258-288:id:251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.