IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v12y2016i02p333-356_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environment, Resource Integration, and New Ventures’ Competitive Advantage in China

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Li
  • Anokhin, Sergey
  • Yin, Miaomiao
  • Hatfield, Donald E.

Abstract

Chinese new ventures have two principal approaches to resource integration: the stabilizing approach, which makes minor changes to a firm's current resource bundles, or the pioneering approach, which creates new capabilities. Two characteristics of Chinese entrepreneurial environment are distinct: environmental dynamism (uncertain markets, unstable institutions and the rapid technology upgrading) and munificence (the degree of competitive intensity and resource abundance). This study suggests that environmental dynamism and environmental munificence moderate the relationships between resource integration approaches and competitive advantage. Results based on a study of 410 Chinese new ventures show that both stabilizing and pioneering approaches to resource integration positively influence new ventures’ competitive advantage under the condition of low environmental dynamism and either high or low environmental munificence. However, neither stabilizing nor pioneering approaches have a significant effect on new ventures’ competitive advantage under the condition of low environmental munificence and high environmental dynamism. Only the pioneering approach has a positive effect on new ventures’ competitive advantage under the condition of high environmental munificence and high environmental dynamism.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Li & Anokhin, Sergey & Yin, Miaomiao & Hatfield, Donald E., 2016. "Environment, Resource Integration, and New Ventures’ Competitive Advantage in China," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 333-356, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:12:y:2016:i:02:p:333-356_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877615000480/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miaomiao Yin & Mathew Hughes & Qilin Hu, 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture resource acquisition: why context matters," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1369-1398, December.
    2. Guoyou Qi & Hailiang Zou & Xuemei Xie, 2020. "Governmental inspection and green innovation: Examining the role of environmental capability and institutional development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1774-1785, July.
    3. Martin Hemmert & Adam R. Cross & Ying Cheng & Jae-Jin Kim & Masahiro Kotosaka & Franz Waldenberger & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Environmental uncertainty and the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship among East Asian new technology-based firms: an institutional perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1683-1711, September.
    4. Lulu Zhou & Haiyan Huang & Xiaolin Chen & Feng Tian, 2023. "Functional diversity of top management teams and firm performance in SMEs: a social network perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 259-286, January.
    5. Ding, Weirong & Ding, Jieyu, 2022. "New venture's product innovativeness strategy, institutional environment and new product performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Fangqing Wei & Yi Yang & Yao Chen & Feng Yang, 2022. "The effects of venture capital investments on industrial innovative opportunities and technological arbitrage opportunities," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2261-2280, April.
    7. Pereira, Vijay & Temouri, Yama & Shen, Kathy Ning & Xie, Xuanli & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring multilevel innovative ecosystems and the strategies of EMNEs through disruptive global expansions – The case of a Chinese MNE," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 92-107.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:12:y:2016:i:02:p:333-356_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.