IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v3y2010i04p386-405_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously?

Author

Listed:
  • Dalal, Reeshad S.
  • Bonaccio, Silvia
  • Highhouse, Scott
  • Ilgen, Daniel R.
  • Mohammed, Susan
  • Slaughter, Jerel E.

Abstract

The major premise of this article is that increased exposure to—and increased application of—theories, methods, and findings from the judgment and decision-making (JDM) field will aid industrial–organizational psychology and organizational behavior (IOOB) researchers and practitioners in studying workplace decisions. To this end, we first provide evidence of the lack of cross-fertilization between JDM and IOOB and then provide an overview of the JDM research literature. Next, with the aid of a panel of prominent IOOB scholars who share JDM interests, we discuss the philosophical and methodological traditions in IOOB and JDM, the areas in which IOOB has already been enriched by JDM as well as the areas in which it might be further enriched in the future, ways of increasing cross-fertilization from JDM to IOOB, and ways in which IOOB can in turn contribute to JDM. Through this focal article, we hope to spark conversation and ultimately engender more cross-fertilization between JDM and IOOB.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalal, Reeshad S. & Bonaccio, Silvia & Highhouse, Scott & Ilgen, Daniel R. & Mohammed, Susan & Slaughter, Jerel E., 2010. "What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 386-405, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:3:y:2010:i:04:p:386-405_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600003552/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Meng & Xu Wang & Juan Du & Xinyue Lin & Xiaoshuang Zhang & Xiang Lu, 2023. "Antecedents and Occupational Attitudinal Consequences of Meaningful Work During the COVID-19: An Investigation of Chinese Nurses," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Alaybek, Balca & Dalal, Reeshad S. & Fyffe, Shea & Aitken, John A. & Zhou, You & Qu, Xiao & Roman, Alexis & Baines, Julia I., 2022. "All’s well that ends (and peaks) well? A meta-analysis of the peak-end rule and duration neglect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Feng, Zhiyu & Liu, Yukun & Wang, Zhen & Savani, Krishna, 2020. "Let’s choose one of each: Using the partition dependence effect to increase diversity in organizations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-26.
    4. Ganegoda, Deshani B. & Folger, Robert, 2015. "Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 27-36.
    5. Nicole M. Giacopelli & Kaila M. Simpson & Reeshad S. Dalal & Kristen L. Randolph & Samantha J. Holland, 2013. "Maximizing as a predictor of job satisfaction and performance: A tale of three scales," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(4), pages 448-469, July.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:448-469 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:3:y:2010:i:04:p:386-405_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.