Author
Listed:
- Cheng, Shannon
- Ng, Linnea
- Trump-Steele, Rachel C. E.
- Corrington, Abby
- Hebl, Mikki
Abstract
As Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) state, their findings on gender representation in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology indicate that “the profession as a whole falls into the category of ‘not walking the talk’” (p. 385). We agree that it is imperative to understand the current state of gender inequity in our field while also actively working toward achieving gender equity. This article attempts to inspire each and every individual in I-O psychology to feel a personal responsibility to engage in behaviors that reduce gender disparities in our field. Although women are normatively the focus in fights for gender equity, men should be equal partners in these efforts. In this commentary, we focus on the contributions that male allies in I-O psychology can make in fostering gender equity. To be clear, we are not claiming that women need to be rescued by men; however, we do believe that I-O psychology can achieve the greatest progress toward gender equity when both women and men engage in supportive efforts. As Emma Watson said in her 2014 United Nations speech, “How can we affect change in the world when only half of it is invited or feel welcome to participate in the conversation?” (UN Women, 2014). In times when political leaders and national laws may fail women, it is crucial that local communities—like the I-O community—adopt a clear stance in promoting gender equity. In this commentary, we define allyship, discuss the importance of male allies, suggest ways in which male allies can help promote gender equity in I-O psychology, and consider potential barriers to male allyship and ways to overcome them. The strategies that we propose are by no means exhaustive; rather, they are suggestions for how to initiate a larger movement.
Suggested Citation
Cheng, Shannon & Ng, Linnea & Trump-Steele, Rachel C. E. & Corrington, Abby & Hebl, Mikki, 2018.
"Calling on Male Allies to Promote Gender Equity in I-O Psychology,"
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 389-398, September.
Handle:
RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:389-398_00
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Birnbaum, Hannah J. & Wilson, Desman & Waytz, Adam, 2024.
"Advantaged groups misperceive how allyship will be received,"
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
- Preston, McKenzie C. & Boyd, Terrance L. & Leigh, Angelica & Burgess, Richard & Marsh, Victor, 2024.
"An ally by any other name: Examining the effects of racial minority leaders as allies for advancing racial justice,"
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:11:y:2018:i:03:p:389-398_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.