IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ilawch/v73y2008i01p45-64_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changes of Chinese Labor Policy and Labor Legislation in the Context of Market Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Ngok, Kinglun

Abstract

This article examines the changes to and relations between labor policy and labor legislation in the context of China's market transition with a focus on the 1994 Labor Law and the 2007 Labor Contract Law. The initial impetus to labor policy change came from the unemployment crisis at the end of the 1970s and the early 1980s. Since then, the state has relaxed its control over labor mobility and job allocation. The last two decades of the last century witnessed the most important changes in China's labor policy, that is, the replacement of lifelong employment with contract-based employment and the replacement of government job assignment with the labor market. Such changes indicate the paradigmatic shifts of China's labor policy in the reform era. Under the new labor policy paradigm, the role of law has been strengthened in governing labor relations and other labor-related affairs. Within the policy context of promoting economic growth while maintaining social stability, both policy and law are coordinated and complementary in stabilizing labor relations and protecting labor rights. Given the socioeconomic circumstances and the underdevelopment of the rule of law in China, policy is still important during the period of market transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngok, Kinglun, 2008. "The Changes of Chinese Labor Policy and Labor Legislation in the Context of Market Transition," International Labor and Working-Class History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 45-64, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ilawch:v:73:y:2008:i:01:p:45-64_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0147547908000045/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pravakar Sahoo & Abhirup Bhunia, 2014. "China's Manufacturing Success Lessons for India," IEG Working Papers 344, Institute of Economic Growth.
    2. Wenjia ZHUANG & Kinglun NGOK, 2014. "Labour inspection in contemporary China: Like the Anglo-Saxon model, but different," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(4), pages 561-585, December.
    3. Fang, Tony & Lin, Carl & Tang, Xueli, 2018. "How Has the Two-Day Weekend Policy Affected Labour Supply and Household Work in China?," IZA Discussion Papers 11698, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Bayari, Celal, 2014. "Labour Management in China: Legislation, Stratification, and Wages," MPRA Paper 103454, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Nov 2014.
    5. Jiang, Xuan & Kennedy, Kendall & Zhong, Jiatong, 2023. "When Opportunity Knocks: China's Open Door Policy and Declining Educational Attainment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Ling, Wanying & Wang, Senhu & Li, Shuanglong, 2024. "Diversity patterns in non-standard employment and their relationship with self-rated health in urban China from 2010 to 2021," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    7. Eli Friedman & Ching Kwan Lee, 2010. "Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30‐Year Retrospective," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 507-533, September.
    8. Fang, Tony & Lin, Carl & Tang, Xueli, 2024. "Where did the time go? The effects of China's two-day weekend policy on labor supply, household work, and wages," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Bayari, Celal, 2018. "Economy and Market in China: The State, Wage Labour and the Construction of the ‘China Price’," MPRA Paper 100900, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Mar 2018.
    10. Zhu, Chen & Zhang, Xiaohui & Zhao, Qiran & Chen, Qihui, 2018. "Hybrid marriages and phenotypic heterosis in offspring: Evidence from China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 102-114.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ilawch:v:73:y:2008:i:01:p:45-64_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ilw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.