IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i2p208-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redistributing More Than the LGBTQ2S Acronym? Planning Beyond Recognition and Rainbows on Vancouver’s Periphery

Author

Listed:
  • Julie A. Podmore

    (Department of Geosciences, John Abbott College, Canada / Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, Concordia University, Canada)

  • Alison L. Bain

    (Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Just urban planning recognizes sociocultural differences and addresses inequality by implementing redistributive mechanisms that move beyond urban neoliberal practices of aestheticization and festivalization. Such planning practices are only beginning to address sexual and gender minority recognition in central urban areas while metronormative assumptions about their geographies absolve suburban municipalities of accountability for LGBTQ+ inclusions. In suburban municipalities, therefore, an LGBTQ+ politics of recognition rarely synchronizes with a politics of redistribution to foster sustained and transformative responses across the professional and managerial boundaries between planning and other local government functions. Consequently, a reparative civic “rainbowization” stands in for transformative urban planning, producing only partial and commodifiable inclusions in the landscape that become absolution for inaction on more evidence-based goals and measurable targets. Drawing on a database of public-facing communication records referencing LGBTQ2S themes for three adjacent peripheral municipalities in the Vancouver city-region (Burnaby, New Westminster, and Surrey), this article analyses the tension between contemporary planning’s civic actions of LGBTQ+ recognition and outcomes of redistribution. In suburban municipalities, a rainbow-washing politics of recognition sidelines transformative planning and policy resulting in little more than the distribution of the LGBTQ2S acronym across municipal documents.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie A. Podmore & Alison L. Bain, 2023. "Redistributing More Than the LGBTQ2S Acronym? Planning Beyond Recognition and Rainbows on Vancouver’s Periphery," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 208-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:2:p:208-222
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v8i2.6294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v8i2.6294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Cohendet & David Grandadam & Laurent Simon, 2010. "The Anatomy of the Creative City," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 91-111.
    2. Kian Goh, 2018. "Safe Cities and Queer Spaces: The Urban Politics of Radical LGBT Activism," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(2), pages 463-477, March.
    3. John T. Jackson, 2014. "Planning for Social Inclusion? What Planners from Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto Say," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 45-76, February.
    4. Martin Zebracki, 2018. "Urban preservation and the queerying spaces of (un)remembering: Memorial landscapes of the Miami Beach art deco historic district," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2261-2285, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petra L. Doan, 2023. "Re-Orienting Planning Practice," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 277-280.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie A. Podmore & Alison L. Bain, 2023. "Redistributing More Than the LGBTQ2S Acronym? Planning Beyond Recognition and Rainbows on Vancouver’s Periphery," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 208-222.
    2. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Basile Michel, 2021. "Creative spaces through the lens of scene. Analysis of the spatial embedding of an artistic community in the M50 district in Shanghai [Les territoires créatifs au prisme de la scène. Analyse de l’e," Post-Print halshs-03365206, HAL.
    4. Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay & Angélo Battaglia, 2013. "A comparative approach to doing research on cities: comparing North American cities to others," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Jaime Sobrino (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Urban Economies, chapter 5, pages 97-126, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Aurélie LALANNE & Guillaume POUYANNE, 2012. "Ten years of metropolization in economics: a bibliometric approach (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-11, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    6. Raphaël Suire, 2016. "Place, platform, and knowledge co-production dynamics: Evidence from makers and FabLab," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1623, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2016.
    7. Rammer, Christian & Kinne, Jan & Blind, Knut, 2016. "Microgeography of innovation in the city: Location patterns of innovative firms in Berlin," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-080, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Jane Zheng, 2021. "STRUCTURING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A ‘CREATIVE CITY’: Urban Sculpture Planning in Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 795-813, September.
    9. Mickael Benaim & Jean-Alain Héraud & Valérie Mérindol, 2016. "Scientific connectivity of European regions: towards a typology of cooperative schemes," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 155-176.
    10. Albert David & Céline Mounier, 2021. "Working in middleground mode: creative communities and intermediary institutions [Trabajar en modo middleground: colectivos creativos e instituciones intermediarias]," Post-Print halshs-03241596, HAL.
    11. Kinne, Jan & Resch, Bernd, 2017. "Analysing and predicting micro-location patterns of software firms," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Patrick Cohendet & David Grandadam & Raphaël Suire, 2021. "Reconsidering the dynamics of local knowledge creation: Middlegrounds and local innovation commons in the case of FabLabs," Post-Print hal-03622101, HAL.
    13. Roberto Antonietti, 2011. "From creativity to innovativeness: micro evidence from Italy," Openloc Working Papers 1117, Public policies and local development.
    14. Muilu Toivo & Kotavaara Niina, 2011. "Diffusion, social structure and functioning of scientific rural networks: comparison of European and Finish examples," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 66-82, January.
    15. Claussen, Jörg & Falck, Oliver & Grohsjean, Thorsten, 2012. "The strength of direct ties: Evidence from the electronic game industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 223-230.
    16. James Boyer, 2020. "Toward an Evolutionary and Sustainability Perspective of the Innovation Ecosystem: Revisiting the Panarchy Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Sebastien Chantelot & Peres Stephanie & Virol Stephane, 2011. "From Talent to Creative City: Towards a conceptual framework," ERSA conference papers ersa11p373, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Basile Michel & Charles Ambrosino, 2019. "Territorialised or without commitment: An in-depth analysis of ‘‘cultural and creative’’ activities in a post-industrial neighbourhood in Grenoble [Territorialisées ou sans attaches : les activités," Post-Print hal-02139388, HAL.
    19. Sabine Cullmann & Inès Guguen-Gicquel, 2024. "De l'idée innovante à la co-créativité sous contrainte : constitution, dynamique et coordination d'équipes de projets Hackathon," Post-Print hal-04631665, HAL.
    20. Karine Duplan, 2023. "What Would an Inclusive City for Gender and Sexual Minorities Be Like? You Need to Ask Queer Folx!," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 138-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:2:p:208-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.