IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v8y2020i1p203-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Ability to Achieve Valued Outcomes among Older Long-Term Unemployed People

Author

Listed:
  • Nienke Velterop

    (Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands / Centre of Applied Labour Market Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands)

  • Jac van der Klink

    (Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands / Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands / Optentia, North-West University, South Africa)

  • Sandra Brouwer

    (Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands / Centre of Applied Labour Market Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands)

  • Hilbrand Oldenhuis

    (Centre of Applied Labour Market Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands)

  • Louis Polstra

    (Centre of Applied Labour Market Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to explore the valuable functionings—things that people consider to be important—of the older long-term unemployed and their ability to achieve valued outcomes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 long-term unemployed people aged 45 and over. Participants were included through purposeful sampling. The theoretical frameworks of the latent deprivation theory and the capability approach were used to develop an interpretive analysis. Nine valuable functionings were identified: social contact, feeling appreciated, structure, feeling useful, meaningfulness, autonomy, financial resources, paid work, and being active. These valuable functionings were partly accessible through the activities that people performed, varying from physically active and physically passive activities to informal work. The functionings of meaningfulness, autonomy, financial resources, and paid work seemed to be difficult to achieve. We identified three groups. The first consisted of people whose work status changed when they entered the benefit system; for them paid work was still a valuable functioning, and they experienced the most difficulties in achieving valued outcomes. The second group also experienced a change in work status once they started to receive benefits, but those people adapted to their new situation by attributing greater value to other functionings. The third group had no change in work status, e.g., housewives who had applied for a benefit because they were not able to make ends meet after a divorce. This group did not experience a loss of functionings due to unemployment, nor did they try to achieve other functionings. The results of this study indicate a need for a more personalized, tailor-made approach, with an emphasis on an individual’s valued outcomes instead of on rules and obligations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nienke Velterop & Jac van der Klink & Sandra Brouwer & Hilbrand Oldenhuis & Louis Polstra, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Ability to Achieve Valued Outcomes among Older Long-Term Unemployed People," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 203-213.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:203-213
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i1.2114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v8i1.2114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:203-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.