IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v7y2019i1p136-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Borch

    (Consumption Research Norway—SIFO, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway)

  • Pål Strandbakken

    (Consumption Research Norway—SIFO, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway)

Abstract

In this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Borch & Pål Strandbakken, 2019. "User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 136-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:136-151
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i1.1597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:136-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.